Investigation into the lunar regolith layer using Apollo mission active seismic data

Abstract Over the past 50 years, advances in lunar research have been made from telescopic, orbital, and surface observations. However, some fundamental scientific issues remain unclear, such as the properties of the regolith layer. There has been a debate about the thickness of the regolith since the Apollo mission seismic experiments. Studies since the 1970s Apollo missions have shown varying regolith layer depths. We use seismic profiles to study selenomorphology at Apollo ASE sites. Our tomographic models revealed an average regolith layer depth of 14.8 m at the Apollo 14 site and 22.5 m at the Apollo 16 site. At the Apollo 14 site, the regolith layer was subdivided into three segments with average velocities of up to 110 m/s (up to 5.2 m depth), up to 150 m/s (up to 8.7 m depth), and up to 200 m/s (up to 14.8 m depth). The subsequent layer, at the base, reached an average velocity of 328 m/s (up to 22.5 m depth). Similar patterns were observed for Apollo 16, with velocity divisions at depths of 12.3 m, 16.4 m, 22.5 m, and 25.8 m. Apollo 14's profiles suggested a gentle sloped interface between regolith and rocky basement. For Apollo 16, the layer's seismic wave velocity gradient is stronger, and the interface suggests higher variation in slopes. The abrupt gradual variation in these velocity values and the larger slope are possibly related to a high rate of local meteoritic impacts, suffered by the Apollo 16 site, in comparison to Apollo 14. The morphological model for the lunar surface and shallow structure explains the thicker regolith at the Apollo 16 site from eroded craters. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02244-3
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation into the lunar regolith layer using Apollo mission active seismic data

Lyara Villanova Silverio, Elder Yokoyama, Susanne Taina Ramalho Maciel
Earth Planets and Space
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Investigation into the lunar regolith layer using Apollo mission active seismic data

Lyara Villanova Silverio, Elder Yokoyama, Susanne Taina Ramalho Maciel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Over the past 50 years, advances in lunar research have been made from telescopic, orbital, and surface observations. However, some fundamental scientific issues remain unclear, such as the properties of the regolith layer. There has been a debate about the thickness of the regolith since the Apollo mission seismic experiments. Studies since the 1970s Apollo missions have shown varying regolith layer depths. We use seismic profiles to study selenomorphology at Apollo ASE sites. Our tomographic models revealed an average regolith layer depth of 14.8 m at the Apollo 14 site and 22.5 m at the Apollo 16 site. At the Apollo 14 site, the regolith layer was subdivided into three segments with average velocities of up to 110 m/s (up to 5.2 m depth), up to 150 m/s (up to 8.7 m depth), and up to 200 m/s (up to 14.8 m depth). The subsequent layer, at the base, reached an average velocity of 328 m/s (up to 22.5 m depth). Similar patterns were observed for Apollo 16, with velocity divisions at depths of 12.3 m, 16.4 m, 22.5 m, and 25.8 m. Apollo 14's profiles suggested a gentle sloped interface between regolith and rocky basement. For Apollo 16, the layer's seismic wave velocity gradient is stronger, and the interface suggests higher variation in slopes. The abrupt gradual variation in these velocity values and the larger slope are possibly related to a high rate of local meteoritic impacts, suffered by the Apollo 16 site, in comparison to Apollo 14. The morphological model for the lunar surface and shallow structure explains the thicker regolith at the Apollo 16 site from eroded craters. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 77(1)
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Life Science Institute (JP)
Universidade de Brasília, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.