Building community: a sustainable framework for diversity, equity and inclusion working groups in geoscience departments

The attraction and retention of systemically marginalized students continues to be a major challenge in the geosciences. Despite a plethora of recruitment strategies by organizations including the National Science Foundation and systemically marginalized scientists themselves, there has not been significant progress in this arena. Furthermore, slow changes in the racial and ethnic diversity of the geoscience population have been accompanied by the less well-documented hostile experiences of systemically marginalized geoscientists. We argue that geoscience departments at academic institutions should ground their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programming in a sustainable framework to build a community that is accountable for DEI. We showcase the effectiveness of this framework through a student-led group called GeoPath at a predominantly white, research-intensive institution in the USA. GeoPath is structured around (1) non-hierarchal leadership, (2) affirmation of individuals’ multiple identities, (3) recognition of and accounting for in-group v. out-group dynamics and (4) supporting a community mindset that was grounded in DEI education (scholarly literature, published statistics, evidence-based practices and lived experience of systemically marginalized people). Through the GeoPath approach, we have identified barriers that the geoscience community faces and which can be grouped into four themes. Additionally, we present a set of tailored DEI initiatives to educate the community on how to address these barriers. We assessed the effectiveness of these initiatives through a survey of the geosciences department community and found that over 85% of survey respondents felt a greater sense of community within the department and 95% agreed that they were better informed in the various challenges and barriers community members faced. With this newfound knowledge, the departmental community began creating and implementing their own DEI initiatives, which we define as ‘community buy-in'. This contribution seeks to illustrate the efficacy of our GeoPath framework, with the hope that DEI working groups in geoscience departments will implement the GeoPath approach to build sustainable cultural changes that hold the community accountable for DEI, and ultimately result in the increased attraction and retention of valuable talent and perspectives from systemically marginalized students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Science Systems and Society
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/esss2024-011
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building community: a sustainable framework for diversity, equity and inclusion working groups in geoscience departments

Brittany N. Hupp, Nicolas Roberts, Errett Callahan, Sheryl L. Honig et al.
Earth Science Systems and Society
Career Development and Diversity
article

Building community: a sustainable framework for diversity, equity and inclusion working groups in geoscience departments

Brittany N. Hupp, Nicolas Roberts, Errett Callahan, Sheryl L. Honig, Alexandra Villa, Aditya Krishnan, Ethan Parrish
article en

Abstract

The attraction and retention of systemically marginalized students continues to be a major challenge in the geosciences. Despite a plethora of recruitment strategies by organizations including the National Science Foundation and systemically marginalized scientists themselves, there has not been significant progress in this arena. Furthermore, slow changes in the racial and ethnic diversity of the geoscience population have been accompanied by the less well-documented hostile experiences of systemically marginalized geoscientists. We argue that geoscience departments at academic institutions should ground their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programming in a sustainable framework to build a community that is accountable for DEI. We showcase the effectiveness of this framework through a student-led group called GeoPath at a predominantly white, research-intensive institution in the USA. GeoPath is structured around (1) non-hierarchal leadership, (2) affirmation of individuals’ multiple identities, (3) recognition of and accounting for in-group v. out-group dynamics and (4) supporting a community mindset that was grounded in DEI education (scholarly literature, published statistics, evidence-based practices and lived experience of systemically marginalized people). Through the GeoPath approach, we have identified barriers that the geoscience community faces and which can be grouped into four themes. Additionally, we present a set of tailored DEI initiatives to educate the community on how to address these barriers. We assessed the effectiveness of these initiatives through a survey of the geosciences department community and found that over 85% of survey respondents felt a greater sense of community within the department and 95% agreed that they were better informed in the various challenges and barriers community members faced. With this newfound knowledge, the departmental community began creating and implementing their own DEI initiatives, which we define as ‘community buy-in'. This contribution seeks to illustrate the efficacy of our GeoPath framework, with the hope that DEI working groups in geoscience departments will implement the GeoPath approach to build sustainable cultural changes that hold the community accountable for DEI, and ultimately result in the increased attraction and retention of valuable talent and perspectives from systemically marginalized students.

Earth Science Systems and SocietyVol. 6(1)
United States Geological Survey (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), George Mason University (US), Hamilton College (US), Society of Economic Geologists (US), Dermatology Consulting Services (US), Illinois Archaeological Survey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.