Pedagogical construction grammar — the fashion of the day?

Abstract This paper provides a short introduction to Construction Grammar (CxG). It first very briefly outlines how linguistic theory has developed over time. Then it describes similarities and differences between the usage-based approach of CxG and Chomsky’s generative approach to the study of language. After that different types of constructions are described in order to explain the concept of constructions as ‘conventionalized form-meaning pairings’. Next, eight different reasons are discussed for why CxG may last and not share the fate of other linguistic models that only ‘survived’ for a more or less short period of time. In this context, important characteristics of different approaches to the description and analysis of language are described that can all be subsumed under the umbrella term ‘Construction Grammar’. Finally. this paper explains why CxG provides an ideal framework for foreign language teaching and learning and it provides a few concrete examples showing how a constructionist approach to language pedagogy could be used in the classroom to deal with different lexicogrammatical phenomena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogical Linguistics
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.25020.her
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical construction grammar — the fashion of the day?

Thorsten Piske, Thomas Herbst
Pedagogical Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Pedagogical construction grammar — the fashion of the day?

Thorsten Piske, Thomas Herbst
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a short introduction to Construction Grammar (CxG). It first very briefly outlines how linguistic theory has developed over time. Then it describes similarities and differences between the usage-based approach of CxG and Chomsky’s generative approach to the study of language. After that different types of constructions are described in order to explain the concept of constructions as ‘conventionalized form-meaning pairings’. Next, eight different reasons are discussed for why CxG may last and not share the fate of other linguistic models that only ‘survived’ for a more or less short period of time. In this context, important characteristics of different approaches to the description and analysis of language are described that can all be subsumed under the umbrella term ‘Construction Grammar’. Finally. this paper explains why CxG provides an ideal framework for foreign language teaching and learning and it provides a few concrete examples showing how a constructionist approach to language pedagogy could be used in the classroom to deal with different lexicogrammatical phenomena.

Pedagogical LinguisticsVol. 7(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.