Perspectives on lean implementation challenges and potentials in higher education institutions: insights from South-East Europe (SEE)

Purpose Implementation of Lean in higher education institutions (HEIs) is relatively unexploited space. Although barriers are identified in general, they have never been quantified and prioritised to the best knowledge of the authors. In addition, combined quantified evaluation of the ease and the benefits of the Lean implementation in the HEIs functional areas, as a potential guide to sequence of Lean implementation, is also missing. Last but not least, research on this issue in less developed countries is almost absent. The purpose of this study is to address these gaps. Design/methodology/approach A Delphi study was conducted, in three cycles, with 20 university professors, all of whom have knowledge in Lean and experience in managing higher education institutions at middle to top management levels. Findings The study proved that, as expected, lack of top management support was perceived as the most influential barrier to Lean implementation, followed by the lack of Lean knowledge and several other barriers like complex and diverse customer structure. Administrative and operational processes were considered the easiest for implementation, with operational processes also seen as offering the highest benefits; in contrast, academic processes were viewed as the least favourable on both dimensions. However, all functional areas were rated above 3 on a five-point scale in both ease and benefit. Originality/value This study’s uniqueness lies in the facts that (i) it contributes original findings on Lean application within the South-Eastern Europe context, a region underrepresented in scholarly literature, (ii) draws conclusions on the specialised expertise of academics familiar with both Lean methodologies and HEIs management in the region, (iii) quantifies the barriers for Lean implementation and last, but not least (iv) identifies functional areas that could serve as effective starting points for Lean adoption in HEIs (based on combined evaluation of the ease of implementation and benefits from implementation among the functional areas).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-12-2024-0254
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on lean implementation challenges and potentials in higher education institutions: insights from South-East Europe (SEE)

Bojan Jovanoski, Rozita Petrinska Labudovikj, Atanas Kochov, Robert Minovski
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Quality and Supply Management
article

Perspectives on lean implementation challenges and potentials in higher education institutions: insights from South-East Europe (SEE)

Bojan Jovanoski, Rozita Petrinska Labudovikj, Atanas Kochov, Robert Minovski
article en

Abstract

Purpose Implementation of Lean in higher education institutions (HEIs) is relatively unexploited space. Although barriers are identified in general, they have never been quantified and prioritised to the best knowledge of the authors. In addition, combined quantified evaluation of the ease and the benefits of the Lean implementation in the HEIs functional areas, as a potential guide to sequence of Lean implementation, is also missing. Last but not least, research on this issue in less developed countries is almost absent. The purpose of this study is to address these gaps. Design/methodology/approach A Delphi study was conducted, in three cycles, with 20 university professors, all of whom have knowledge in Lean and experience in managing higher education institutions at middle to top management levels. Findings The study proved that, as expected, lack of top management support was perceived as the most influential barrier to Lean implementation, followed by the lack of Lean knowledge and several other barriers like complex and diverse customer structure. Administrative and operational processes were considered the easiest for implementation, with operational processes also seen as offering the highest benefits; in contrast, academic processes were viewed as the least favourable on both dimensions. However, all functional areas were rated above 3 on a five-point scale in both ease and benefit. Originality/value This study’s uniqueness lies in the facts that (i) it contributes original findings on Lean application within the South-Eastern Europe context, a region underrepresented in scholarly literature, (ii) draws conclusions on the specialised expertise of academics familiar with both Lean methodologies and HEIs management in the region, (iii) quantifies the barriers for Lean implementation and last, but not least (iv) identifies functional areas that could serve as effective starting points for Lean adoption in HEIs (based on combined evaluation of the ease of implementation and benefits from implementation among the functional areas).

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.