Neotectonic Framework of Eastern Taiwan: Insights from Coseismic Rupture Patterns of the 2022 Chihshang Earthquake and Paleoseismic Investigations

ABSTRACT The Mw 6.9 Chihshang earthquake on 18 September 2022 produced ∼65 km of surface ruptures in eastern Taiwan, marking the most extensive surface faulting since the 1999 Mw 7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake. Field and geophysical data reveal that the event ruptured the west-dipping Central Range fault system (CeRFS), rather than the traditionally dominant Longitudinal Valley fault system (LVFS). The rupture exhibited thrust motion with a significant left-lateral component, showing maximum vertical and horizontal offsets of ∼1.2 and 2.0 m, respectively. In the Changliang area, the 2022 Chihshang earthquake rupture reactivated a pre-existing scarp (∼1.7 m high), indicating cumulative displacements from past earthquakes. Paleoseismic trenching at Songpu identified five surface-rupturing events since ∼A.D. 1525, including the 1951 Longitudinal Valley earthquake sequence and 2022 Chihshang earthquake. Radiocarbon dating constrains three earlier events at A.D. 1658–1796, A.D. 1591–1689, and A.D. 1525–1611, yielding long-term vertical slip rates of 6.7–7.3 mm/yr and up to ∼11.5 mm/yr from stratigraphic reconstruction. The contrasting rupture geometries of the 1951 Longitudinal Valley earthquake sequence and 2022 Chihshang earthquake suggest mechanical interaction and stress transfer between the west-dipping CeRFS and the east-dipping LVFS. These findings redefine the fault architecture of the Longitudinal Valley and highlight the CeRFS as a critical but previously underappreciated source of seismic hazard in eastern Taiwan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250062
Citations
2
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neotectonic Framework of Eastern Taiwan: Insights from Coseismic Rupture Patterns of the 2022 Chihshang Earthquake and Paleoseismic Investigations

Shao‐Yi Huang, Jiun‐Yee Yen, Nai-Wun Shih, Fajar Rizki Widiatmoko et al.
2 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
article

Neotectonic Framework of Eastern Taiwan: Insights from Coseismic Rupture Patterns of the 2022 Chihshang Earthquake and Paleoseismic Investigations

Shao‐Yi Huang, Jiun‐Yee Yen, Nai-Wun Shih, Fajar Rizki Widiatmoko, W.J. Huang, Yi-Chun Hsu, C. P. Chang, I-Chin Yen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Mw 6.9 Chihshang earthquake on 18 September 2022 produced ∼65 km of surface ruptures in eastern Taiwan, marking the most extensive surface faulting since the 1999 Mw 7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake. Field and geophysical data reveal that the event ruptured the west-dipping Central Range fault system (CeRFS), rather than the traditionally dominant Longitudinal Valley fault system (LVFS). The rupture exhibited thrust motion with a significant left-lateral component, showing maximum vertical and horizontal offsets of ∼1.2 and 2.0 m, respectively. In the Changliang area, the 2022 Chihshang earthquake rupture reactivated a pre-existing scarp (∼1.7 m high), indicating cumulative displacements from past earthquakes. Paleoseismic trenching at Songpu identified five surface-rupturing events since ∼A.D. 1525, including the 1951 Longitudinal Valley earthquake sequence and 2022 Chihshang earthquake. Radiocarbon dating constrains three earlier events at A.D. 1658–1796, A.D. 1591–1689, and A.D. 1525–1611, yielding long-term vertical slip rates of 6.7–7.3 mm/yr and up to ∼11.5 mm/yr from stratigraphic reconstruction. The contrasting rupture geometries of the 1951 Longitudinal Valley earthquake sequence and 2022 Chihshang earthquake suggest mechanical interaction and stress transfer between the west-dipping CeRFS and the east-dipping LVFS. These findings redefine the fault architecture of the Longitudinal Valley and highlight the CeRFS as a critical but previously underappreciated source of seismic hazard in eastern Taiwan.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 116(1)
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW), National Central University (TW), National Penghu University of Science and Technology (TW), National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.