Evaluation of a Gene Expression-Based Machine Learning Classifier to Discriminate Normal from Cancer Gastric Organoids

Three-dimensional cell model systems such as tumour organoids allow for in vitro modelling of self-organized tissue with functional and histologic similarity to in vivo tissue. However, there is a need for standard protocols and techniques to confirm the presence of cancer within organoids derived from tumour tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of a Nanostring gene expression-based machine learning classifier to determine the presence of cancer or normal organoids in cultures developed from both benign and cancerous stomach biopsies. A prospective cohort of normal and cancer stomach biopsies were collected from 2019 to 2022. Tissue specimens were processed for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedding (FFPE) and a subset of specimens were established in organoid cultures. Specimens were labelled as normal or cancer according to analysis of the FFPE tissue by two pathologists. The gene expression in FFPE and organoid tissue was measured using a 107 gene Nanostring codeset and normalized using the Removal of Unwanted Variation III algorithm. Our machine learning model was developed using five-fold nested cross-validation to classify normal or cancer gastric tissue from publicly available Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) gene expression data. The models were externally validated using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), as well as our own FFPE and organoid gene expression data. A total of 60 samples were collected, including 38 cancer FFPE specimens, 5 normal FFPE specimens, 12 cancer organoids, and 5 normal organoids. The optimal model design used a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model for feature selection and an ElasticNet model for classification, yielding area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99–1], 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87–0.93], and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74–0.84] for ACRG (internal test), FFPE, and organoid (external test) data, respectively. The performance of our final model on external data achieved AUC values of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98–1], 0.94 [95% CI: 0.86–1], and 0.85 [95% CI: 0.63–1] for TCGA, FFPE, and organoid specimens, respectively. Using a public database to create a machine learning model in combination with a Nanostring gene expression assay allows us to allocate organoids and their paired whole tissue samples. This platform yielded reasonable accuracy for FFPE and organoid specimens, with the former being more accurate. This study re-affirms that although organoids are a high-fidelity model, there are still limitations in validating the recapitulation of cancer in vitro.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organoids
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/organoids4040032
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Gene Expression-Based Machine Learning Classifier to Discriminate Normal from Cancer Gastric Organoids

Daniel Skubleny, Gina R. Rayat, Dan Schiller, Sebastião N. Martins-Filho et al.
Organoids
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

Evaluation of a Gene Expression-Based Machine Learning Classifier to Discriminate Normal from Cancer Gastric Organoids

Daniel Skubleny, Gina R. Rayat, Dan Schiller, Sebastião N. Martins-Filho, H. Ahmed Hussein Ahmed, David McLean
article en

Abstract

Three-dimensional cell model systems such as tumour organoids allow for in vitro modelling of self-organized tissue with functional and histologic similarity to in vivo tissue. However, there is a need for standard protocols and techniques to confirm the presence of cancer within organoids derived from tumour tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of a Nanostring gene expression-based machine learning classifier to determine the presence of cancer or normal organoids in cultures developed from both benign and cancerous stomach biopsies. A prospective cohort of normal and cancer stomach biopsies were collected from 2019 to 2022. Tissue specimens were processed for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedding (FFPE) and a subset of specimens were established in organoid cultures. Specimens were labelled as normal or cancer according to analysis of the FFPE tissue by two pathologists. The gene expression in FFPE and organoid tissue was measured using a 107 gene Nanostring codeset and normalized using the Removal of Unwanted Variation III algorithm. Our machine learning model was developed using five-fold nested cross-validation to classify normal or cancer gastric tissue from publicly available Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) gene expression data. The models were externally validated using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), as well as our own FFPE and organoid gene expression data. A total of 60 samples were collected, including 38 cancer FFPE specimens, 5 normal FFPE specimens, 12 cancer organoids, and 5 normal organoids. The optimal model design used a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model for feature selection and an ElasticNet model for classification, yielding area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99–1], 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87–0.93], and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74–0.84] for ACRG (internal test), FFPE, and organoid (external test) data, respectively. The performance of our final model on external data achieved AUC values of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98–1], 0.94 [95% CI: 0.86–1], and 0.85 [95% CI: 0.63–1] for TCGA, FFPE, and organoid specimens, respectively. Using a public database to create a machine learning model in combination with a Nanostring gene expression assay allows us to allocate organoids and their paired whole tissue samples. This platform yielded reasonable accuracy for FFPE and organoid specimens, with the former being more accurate. This study re-affirms that although organoids are a high-fidelity model, there are still limitations in validating the recapitulation of cancer in vitro.

OrganoidsVol. 4(4)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.