Turbulent Hydrofoil Cavitation Simulations: Applications of RANS with Eddy Viscosity and Interfacial Turbulence Damping and LES
The performance of various turbulence modelling methods for simulating cavitating flow over a hydrofoil was investigated. VOF mixture modelling was applied for the multiphase flow, along with a standard two-equation turbulence model, a hybrid RANS-LES method, and a wall-modeled LES approach. The simulations were conducted in a numerical cavitation tank with experimental data available for a range of Reynolds numbers and cavitation conditions. A Reboud damping for eddy viscosity was applied (hereafter referred to as SST-R). A less common approach, incorporating interfacial turbulence damping based on physical arguments regarding the wall-like behavior of phase interfaces, was also applied (referred to here as SST-D). Our results indicate that the standard RANS method fails to predict the breakdown of lift with decreasing cavitation numbers, a phenomenon observed in the experiments and in earlier studies. Incorporating turbulence damping at the cavity interface or directly on the eddy viscosity improves predictions for both URANS and hybrid RANS-LES methods. Both the SST-D and SST-R agreed well with available experimental data, and the LES method consistently provided accurate results across all numerical grids.
Authors
- Petteri Peltonen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-5426)
- Jan Hallander
- Timo Siikonen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3759-9291)
- Mika Nuutinen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-8321)
- Ville Viitanen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-3706)
Institutions
- RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE)
- ABB (Finland) (FI)
- Oldham Council (GB)
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Aalto University (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2025-12-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13122311
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.86