When and how does educational specialization diversity influence team innovation: Paradoxical leadership as a moderator and team reflexivity as a mediator

Abstract Given the paradoxical nature of educational specialization diversity, we suggest that paradoxical leadership effectively manages this diversity and enhances its positive impact on team innovation. Building on the group as information processor framework, we propose that team reflexivity, a critical information‐processing activity within teams, mediates the interaction between educational specialization diversity and paradoxical leadership in influencing team innovation. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a multi‐wave, multi‐source field study with data from 126 teams. Our findings demonstrate that paradoxical leadership positively moderates the relationship between educational specialization diversity and team innovation, as well as the relationship between educational specialization diversity and team reflexivity. Our results also reveal that team reflexivity mediates the moderated relationship between educational specialization diversity, paradoxical leadership, and team innovation. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70048
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When and how does educational specialization diversity influence team innovation: Paradoxical leadership as a moderator and team reflexivity as a mediator

Ying Zhang, Yan Zhang
Applied Psychology
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

When and how does educational specialization diversity influence team innovation: Paradoxical leadership as a moderator and team reflexivity as a mediator

Ying Zhang, Yan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given the paradoxical nature of educational specialization diversity, we suggest that paradoxical leadership effectively manages this diversity and enhances its positive impact on team innovation. Building on the group as information processor framework, we propose that team reflexivity, a critical information‐processing activity within teams, mediates the interaction between educational specialization diversity and paradoxical leadership in influencing team innovation. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a multi‐wave, multi‐source field study with data from 126 teams. Our findings demonstrate that paradoxical leadership positively moderates the relationship between educational specialization diversity and team innovation, as well as the relationship between educational specialization diversity and team reflexivity. Our results also reveal that team reflexivity mediates the moderated relationship between educational specialization diversity, paradoxical leadership, and team innovation. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Applied PsychologyVol. 74(6)
Peking University (CN), Peking University Sixth Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.