Towards Smart Aviation: Evaluating Smart Airport Development Plans Using an Integrated Spherical Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach

Rapid progress in sustainable and intelligent transportation has intensified interest in smart airport initiatives, driven by the need to support environmentally responsible and technology-enabled aviation development. As complex sociotechnical subsystems of smart aviation, smart airports integrate advanced digital, operational, and organizational technologies to enhance efficiency, resilience, and passenger experience. With increasing emphasis on such transformations, multiple strategic development plans have emerged, each with distinct priorities and implementation pathways, which necessitates a rigorous and transparent evaluation mechanism to support informed decision-making under uncertainty. This study proposes an integrated spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for assessing and ranking smart airport development plans. Subjective expert judgments are modeled using spherical fuzzy sets, allowing for the simultaneous consideration of positive, neutral, and negative membership degrees to better capture linguistic and ambiguous information. Expert importance is determined through a hybrid weighting scheme that combines a social trust network model with an entropy-based objective measure, thereby reflecting both relational credibility and informational contribution. Criterion weights are computed through an integrated approach that merges criteria importance through the inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) method with the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method, balancing data-driven structure and expert strategic preferences. The weighted evaluations are aggregated using a spherical fuzzy extension of the combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method to obtain the final rankings. A case study involving smart airport development planning in China is conducted to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Sensitivity, ablation, and comparative analyses demonstrate that the framework yields stable, discriminative, and interpretable rankings. The results confirm that the proposed method provides a reliable and practical decision support tool for smart airport development and can be adapted to other smart transportation planning contexts.