A structural framework for fire and explosion risk in EFRTs: empirical validation using EFA, CFA, and path analysis

External Floating Roof Tanks (EFRTs) are prone to fire and explosion due to the convergence of human error, technical failure, and weak emergency response. Existing models often use ranking-based methods that fail to reflect systemic interdependencies. This study aimed to develop and validate a structural model that explains the latent constructs underlying EFRT hazards using a theory-informed, data-driven approach. A structured checklist with 71 indicators across 11 domains was developed through expert input and literature review. Data from 285 professionals were analysed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to identify key dimensions, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and path analysis for model validation. EFA extracted 11 factors explaining 72% of the total variance. CFA showed strong fit indices (CFI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.048). Path analysis confirmed significant causal relationships, including those from operational error to technical failure and fire suppression breakdown. A real-world case study involving 11 EFRTs demonstrated that model-predicted high-risk tanks aligned closely with expert evaluations. The final model provides a multidimensional and statistically validated framework for understanding EFRT risks, integrating human, technical, and organizational domains. This model offers practical guidance for safety engineers to identify high-leverage intervention points. It supports the development of predictive safety tools and can be adapted for integration into intelligent fire prevention systems across storage infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30839-z
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A structural framework for fire and explosion risk in EFRTs: empirical validation using EFA, CFA, and path analysis

Leila Khazini, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh, Parisa Moshashaei, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi et al.
Scientific Reports
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

A structural framework for fire and explosion risk in EFRTs: empirical validation using EFA, CFA, and path analysis

Leila Khazini, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh, Parisa Moshashaei, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Omid Akbarzadeh
article en

Abstract

External Floating Roof Tanks (EFRTs) are prone to fire and explosion due to the convergence of human error, technical failure, and weak emergency response. Existing models often use ranking-based methods that fail to reflect systemic interdependencies. This study aimed to develop and validate a structural model that explains the latent constructs underlying EFRT hazards using a theory-informed, data-driven approach. A structured checklist with 71 indicators across 11 domains was developed through expert input and literature review. Data from 285 professionals were analysed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to identify key dimensions, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and path analysis for model validation. EFA extracted 11 factors explaining 72% of the total variance. CFA showed strong fit indices (CFI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.048). Path analysis confirmed significant causal relationships, including those from operational error to technical failure and fire suppression breakdown. A real-world case study involving 11 EFRTs demonstrated that model-predicted high-risk tanks aligned closely with expert evaluations. The final model provides a multidimensional and statistically validated framework for understanding EFRT risks, integrating human, technical, and organizational domains. This model offers practical guidance for safety engineers to identify high-leverage intervention points. It supports the development of predictive safety tools and can be adapted for integration into intelligent fire prevention systems across storage infrastructures.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Canberra (AU), University of Tabriz (IR), Monash University (AU)
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University of Tabriz
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.