Compliance by code: The need for automated protocols in breath alcohol testing – case reports

The accuracy and reliability of forensic breath alcohol testing depends on adherence to established protocols for observation periods and operator responses to instrument status messages. This paper presents two case reports illustrating procedural errors following status messages produced by the DataMaster DMT breath alcohol analyzer. In both cases, operators failed to follow the required procedures after receiving messages indicating the presence of mouth alcohol or interfering substances. These cases demonstrate how operator discretion and failure to follow established protocols can result in unreliable or inadmissible results. The findings reinforce the need for automated software controls that eliminate operator discretion in breath alcohol testing procedures. Implementing automated protocols would enhance quality assurance, reduce legal challenges, and improve the scientific validity of breath alcohol testing in forensic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Synergy
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100648
Primary Topic
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compliance by code: The need for automated protocols in breath alcohol testing – case reports

Aaron Olson
Forensic Science International Synergy
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
article

Compliance by code: The need for automated protocols in breath alcohol testing – case reports

Aaron Olson
article en

Abstract

The accuracy and reliability of forensic breath alcohol testing depends on adherence to established protocols for observation periods and operator responses to instrument status messages. This paper presents two case reports illustrating procedural errors following status messages produced by the DataMaster DMT breath alcohol analyzer. In both cases, operators failed to follow the required procedures after receiving messages indicating the presence of mouth alcohol or interfering substances. These cases demonstrate how operator discretion and failure to follow established protocols can result in unreliable or inadmissible results. The findings reinforce the need for automated software controls that eliminate operator discretion in breath alcohol testing procedures. Implementing automated protocols would enhance quality assurance, reduce legal challenges, and improve the scientific validity of breath alcohol testing in forensic contexts.

Forensic Science International SynergyVol. 11
Scientific Consulting Group (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.