HIV Testing and Prevention Services in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Multi-method Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Despite the well-established need to increase access to HIV testing and prevention services among people with serious mental illness, little is known about the determinants of implementation of these services in behavioral health organizations. This multi-method study was conducted in King County, Washington, an EHE priority jurisdiction. A quantitative survey of 16 county behavioral health organizations explored the HIV testing and prevention services currently offered. Three organizations that viewed HIV testing and prevention services as very important or essential for their clients participated in in-depth qualitative interviews; 21 staff, providers, and leaders were interviewed about barriers and facilitators to on-site HIV testing and prescription or referral for Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We used a rapid deductive qualitative analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0. Commonly identified facilitators were organizational culture and a non-judgmental approach to care, frequent contact and long-standing relationships with clients, and a mission to provide holistic care. Commonly identified barriers were lack of resources and trained staff, infrastructure challenges (inability to bill services, weak referral pathways), higher priorities for services (including testing for Hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections), and lack of knowledge and information. Lack of trained staff and the complexity of the service were more often perceived as barriers to providing PrEP on-site than HIV testing. Opportunities to build capacity were also identified, and included training, implementing universal testing, and expanding partnerships with other organizations to provide HIV testing and prevention services on-site at the behavioral health organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04966-7
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HIV Testing and Prevention Services in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Multi-method Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Lydia Chwastiak, C.R.I. Clayton, Rebecca Hutcheson, Julia C. Dombrowski et al.
AIDS and Behavior
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

HIV Testing and Prevention Services in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Multi-method Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Lydia Chwastiak, C.R.I. Clayton, Rebecca Hutcheson, Julia C. Dombrowski, David A. Katz, Mira Reichman, Laurie Sylla
article en

Abstract

Despite the well-established need to increase access to HIV testing and prevention services among people with serious mental illness, little is known about the determinants of implementation of these services in behavioral health organizations. This multi-method study was conducted in King County, Washington, an EHE priority jurisdiction. A quantitative survey of 16 county behavioral health organizations explored the HIV testing and prevention services currently offered. Three organizations that viewed HIV testing and prevention services as very important or essential for their clients participated in in-depth qualitative interviews; 21 staff, providers, and leaders were interviewed about barriers and facilitators to on-site HIV testing and prescription or referral for Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We used a rapid deductive qualitative analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0. Commonly identified facilitators were organizational culture and a non-judgmental approach to care, frequent contact and long-standing relationships with clients, and a mission to provide holistic care. Commonly identified barriers were lack of resources and trained staff, infrastructure challenges (inability to bill services, weak referral pathways), higher priorities for services (including testing for Hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections), and lack of knowledge and information. Lack of trained staff and the complexity of the service were more often perceived as barriers to providing PrEP on-site than HIV testing. Opportunities to build capacity were also identified, and included training, implementing universal testing, and expanding partnerships with other organizations to provide HIV testing and prevention services on-site at the behavioral health organization.

AIDS and Behavior
Public Health – Seattle & King County (US), University of Washington (US), Behavioral Tech Research, Inc. (US)
University of Washington, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.