Emerging Hemp-Derived Semi-Synthetic Cannabinoids, Absent Regulations: Patterns of Use and Adverse Effects Among a Sample of U.S. Cannabis Consumers

<b>Introduction:</b> Hemp-derived semi-synthetic cannabinoids are marketed as legal alternatives to cannabis containing ≥0.3% Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but remain unregulated at the federal and state levels. Their growing availability underscores the urgent need to investigate patterns of use and associated health risks. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected <i>via</i> an online survey on self-reported patterns and associations of semi-synthetic cannabinoid use, as well as related factors and effects, from a sample of U.S. adults (≥18 years old) who reported past-year cannabis use. <b>Results:</b> In the sample (<i>N</i> = 229; 55.5% male, 63.8% White, 80.3% not Hispanic/Latino), nearly half (44.5%) reported using at least one semi-synthetic cannabinoid in the past year. Patterns of use varied by cannabinoid: Δ<sup>7</sup>-THC (10.0%), Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC (21.8%), Δ<sup>10</sup>-THC (14.0%), THC-O-acetate (5.2%), THC homologue tetrahydrocannabiphorol (24.4%), and hydrogenated derivative hexahydrocannabinol (3.5%). Older individuals had lower odds of reporting past-year semi-synthetic cannabinoid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.004); factors associated with higher odds of reporting semi-synthetic cannabinoid use included reporting 101-1,000 lifetime cannabis uses (vs. <100 times; aOR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.02, 6.38, <i>p</i> = 0.046), reporting 1,001-10,000 lifetime cannabis uses (vs. <100 times; aOR = 4.40, 95% CI = 1.57, 12.33, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and reporting non-inhaled forms of cannabis as the most frequent route of administration in the past year (vs. smoking; aOR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.18, 7.53, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Adverse effects were reported across all semi-synthetic cannabinoids. <b>Discussion:</b> Semi-synthetic cannabinoid use was prevalent among this sample, especially among younger individuals. Despite their popularity, adverse effects underscore the need for regulation and research to address these products' safety and public health implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251391987
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging Hemp-Derived Semi-Synthetic Cannabinoids, Absent Regulations: Patterns of Use and Adverse Effects Among a Sample of U.S. Cannabis Consumers

Ziva D. Cooper, Stephanie Lake, Conor H. Murray, Elisa Pabon
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Emerging Hemp-Derived Semi-Synthetic Cannabinoids, Absent Regulations: Patterns of Use and Adverse Effects Among a Sample of U.S. Cannabis Consumers

Ziva D. Cooper, Stephanie Lake, Conor H. Murray, Elisa Pabon
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Hemp-derived semi-synthetic cannabinoids are marketed as legal alternatives to cannabis containing ≥0.3% Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but remain unregulated at the federal and state levels. Their growing availability underscores the urgent need to investigate patterns of use and associated health risks. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected <i>via</i> an online survey on self-reported patterns and associations of semi-synthetic cannabinoid use, as well as related factors and effects, from a sample of U.S. adults (≥18 years old) who reported past-year cannabis use. <b>Results:</b> In the sample (<i>N</i> = 229; 55.5% male, 63.8% White, 80.3% not Hispanic/Latino), nearly half (44.5%) reported using at least one semi-synthetic cannabinoid in the past year. Patterns of use varied by cannabinoid: Δ<sup>7</sup>-THC (10.0%), Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC (21.8%), Δ<sup>10</sup>-THC (14.0%), THC-O-acetate (5.2%), THC homologue tetrahydrocannabiphorol (24.4%), and hydrogenated derivative hexahydrocannabinol (3.5%). Older individuals had lower odds of reporting past-year semi-synthetic cannabinoid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.004); factors associated with higher odds of reporting semi-synthetic cannabinoid use included reporting 101-1,000 lifetime cannabis uses (vs. <100 times; aOR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.02, 6.38, <i>p</i> = 0.046), reporting 1,001-10,000 lifetime cannabis uses (vs. <100 times; aOR = 4.40, 95% CI = 1.57, 12.33, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and reporting non-inhaled forms of cannabis as the most frequent route of administration in the past year (vs. smoking; aOR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.18, 7.53, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Adverse effects were reported across all semi-synthetic cannabinoids. <b>Discussion:</b> Semi-synthetic cannabinoid use was prevalent among this sample, especially among younger individuals. Despite their popularity, adverse effects underscore the need for regulation and research to address these products' safety and public health implications.

Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California System (US), Neurobehavioral Systems (US), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.