Client preferences in noncommunicable diseases management in Australia: A scoping review

Noncommunicable diseases (NCD) are the leading causes of mortality in Australia. Understanding clients' preferences is essential to implement effective care models that revitalize utilization of services. This study aims to review existing evidence on client preferences of service delivery among people with NCD in Australia. We followed PRISMA extension for scoping review. Articles conducted with discrete choice experiment were included. Clients with NCD in general or one of the five major diseases: cardiac diseases, diabetes, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and mental health disorders. We used the Differentiated Service Delivery Framework to synthesize the findings. Clients expressed a preference for better-trained health workers to handle sample collection and referrals rather than doing it themselves. For polygenic cancer testing, clients preferred primary care physicians over genetic specialists. There was a preference for a model of care that engaged clients in the decision-making process, safe, comprehensive, effective, and affordable services delivered closer to the community, and exhibited shorter waiting times to receive care. Clients preferred face-to-face presence for anxiety and depression screening, polygenic testing for cancer, and follow-up care for breast cancer survivor. Clients preferred less frequent follow-up appointments except those with NCD that needs close follow-up. Clients need a health system that prioritizes patient-centered and community-based models that enhance accessibility, affordability, and safety. Reducing wait times, offering flexible follow-ups and face-to-face services may improve patient satisfaction, trust, and treatment adherence. Failing to align services with patient preferences may lead to lower engagement and reduce healthcare effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005568
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Client preferences in noncommunicable diseases management in Australia: A scoping review

Aklilu Endalamaw, Resham Bahadur Khatri, Darsy Darssan, Yibeltal Assefa
PLOS Global Public Health
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Client preferences in noncommunicable diseases management in Australia: A scoping review

Aklilu Endalamaw, Resham Bahadur Khatri, Darsy Darssan, Yibeltal Assefa
article en

Abstract

Noncommunicable diseases (NCD) are the leading causes of mortality in Australia. Understanding clients' preferences is essential to implement effective care models that revitalize utilization of services. This study aims to review existing evidence on client preferences of service delivery among people with NCD in Australia. We followed PRISMA extension for scoping review. Articles conducted with discrete choice experiment were included. Clients with NCD in general or one of the five major diseases: cardiac diseases, diabetes, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and mental health disorders. We used the Differentiated Service Delivery Framework to synthesize the findings. Clients expressed a preference for better-trained health workers to handle sample collection and referrals rather than doing it themselves. For polygenic cancer testing, clients preferred primary care physicians over genetic specialists. There was a preference for a model of care that engaged clients in the decision-making process, safe, comprehensive, effective, and affordable services delivered closer to the community, and exhibited shorter waiting times to receive care. Clients preferred face-to-face presence for anxiety and depression screening, polygenic testing for cancer, and follow-up care for breast cancer survivor. Clients preferred less frequent follow-up appointments except those with NCD that needs close follow-up. Clients need a health system that prioritizes patient-centered and community-based models that enhance accessibility, affordability, and safety. Reducing wait times, offering flexible follow-ups and face-to-face services may improve patient satisfaction, trust, and treatment adherence. Failing to align services with patient preferences may lead to lower engagement and reduce healthcare effectiveness.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(12)
The University of Queensland (AU), Bahir Dar University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.