Glide WS: Methodology and Initial Assessment of Performance for Docking Accuracy and Virtual Screening

Powered by dramatic advances in computer hardware, the advent of ultralarge make-on-demand virtual libraries, and a shift in small-molecule discovery toward more challenging targets with limited known actives, there has been a growing interest in the development of performant virtual screening methods that can reliably deliver novel hits. We report on a new method called Glide WS, that builds on our earlier efforts (WScore) to introduce an explicit representation of water structure and dynamics to an empirical scoring function suitable for high-throughput docking. This scoring function has been carefully tuned using absolute binding free energy perturbation calculations (ABFEP). Compared with Glide SP, Glide WS offers significant gains in the two primary tasks for molecular docking in drug discovery, pose prediction and virtual screening enrichment. For docking accuracy, Glide WS achieves a self-docking accuracy of 92% on a diverse set of 1477 protein ligand complexes as compared to 85% for Glide SP, using a criterion of 2.5 Å. We also demonstrate significantly improved virtual screening enrichment using a diverse data set covering of 38 targets together with three different computationally generated libraries of decoys, combined with standard known ChEMBL actives. We focus on ligands ranked in the top few percent of the database (the subset that is relevant to practical virtual screening efforts) and demonstrate that, along with improved enrichment of ChEMBL actives, Glide WS achieves a remarkable reduction in the number of poorly scoring decoys (as calibrated by ABFEP calculations), across a high percentage of targets, as compared to Glide SP. These results suggest that considerably higher hit rates will be observed, as compared to conventional rigid receptor docking, in practical virtual screening applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01316
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glide WS: Methodology and Initial Assessment of Performance for Docking Accuracy and Virtual Screening

Richard A. Friesner, Yeyue Xiong, Ivan Tubert‐Brohman, Pierre A. Devlaminck et al.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Glide WS: Methodology and Initial Assessment of Performance for Docking Accuracy and Virtual Screening

Richard A. Friesner, Yeyue Xiong, Ivan Tubert‐Brohman, Pierre A. Devlaminck, Steven V. Jerome, Yuqi Zhang, Robert B. Murphy
article en

Abstract

Powered by dramatic advances in computer hardware, the advent of ultralarge make-on-demand virtual libraries, and a shift in small-molecule discovery toward more challenging targets with limited known actives, there has been a growing interest in the development of performant virtual screening methods that can reliably deliver novel hits. We report on a new method called Glide WS, that builds on our earlier efforts (WScore) to introduce an explicit representation of water structure and dynamics to an empirical scoring function suitable for high-throughput docking. This scoring function has been carefully tuned using absolute binding free energy perturbation calculations (ABFEP). Compared with Glide SP, Glide WS offers significant gains in the two primary tasks for molecular docking in drug discovery, pose prediction and virtual screening enrichment. For docking accuracy, Glide WS achieves a self-docking accuracy of 92% on a diverse set of 1477 protein ligand complexes as compared to 85% for Glide SP, using a criterion of 2.5 Å. We also demonstrate significantly improved virtual screening enrichment using a diverse data set covering of 38 targets together with three different computationally generated libraries of decoys, combined with standard known ChEMBL actives. We focus on ligands ranked in the top few percent of the database (the subset that is relevant to practical virtual screening efforts) and demonstrate that, along with improved enrichment of ChEMBL actives, Glide WS achieves a remarkable reduction in the number of poorly scoring decoys (as calibrated by ABFEP calculations), across a high percentage of targets, as compared to Glide SP. These results suggest that considerably higher hit rates will be observed, as compared to conventional rigid receptor docking, in practical virtual screening applications.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 21(24)
Schrodinger (United States) (US), Schrodinger (United States) (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.