Construction of innovation literacy indicator system for medical college students and analysis of current situation based on a cross-sectional observation in China

Innovation literacy is a critical competency for medical students, yet existing research lacks precise measurement tools. This study aimed to develop a scientific, practical indicator system for evaluating Chinese medical students’ innovation literacy and assess their current level. Using the Delphi expert consultation method, we established an indicator system comprising 3 primary indicators, 6 secondary indicators, and 19 specific items, with weights calculated via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A stratified sampling on-site survey was conducted among 584 medical students in Yantai, with data analyzed through descriptive analysis, t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. The overall innovation literacy score was 3.16±0.79, significantly influenced by age, grade, and professional category (P < 0.05): older and higher-grade students performed better, while those majoring in medicine and medical engineering outperformed peers in medical management. The indicator system demonstrates scientific weighting and credible results, providing a solid basis for evaluating medical students’ innovation literacy. It highlights the role of innovative thinking andoffers practical guidance for curriculum reform, resource allocation, and faculty development, with policy relevance and replicability across higher education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06352-z
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction of innovation literacy indicator system for medical college students and analysis of current situation based on a cross-sectional observation in China

Yong Jiang, Xiu‐Qing Li, Chuyun Liu, Meijing Yang et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Construction of innovation literacy indicator system for medical college students and analysis of current situation based on a cross-sectional observation in China

Yong Jiang, Xiu‐Qing Li, Chuyun Liu, Meijing Yang, Zhang Cao, Haozheng Wang, Wanru Zhao, Guangcheng Wang, Ronghang Liu, Xiaotong Shao, Chunlei Han, Surong Zhao
article en

Abstract

Innovation literacy is a critical competency for medical students, yet existing research lacks precise measurement tools. This study aimed to develop a scientific, practical indicator system for evaluating Chinese medical students’ innovation literacy and assess their current level. Using the Delphi expert consultation method, we established an indicator system comprising 3 primary indicators, 6 secondary indicators, and 19 specific items, with weights calculated via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A stratified sampling on-site survey was conducted among 584 medical students in Yantai, with data analyzed through descriptive analysis, t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. The overall innovation literacy score was 3.16±0.79, significantly influenced by age, grade, and professional category (P < 0.05): older and higher-grade students performed better, while those majoring in medicine and medical engineering outperformed peers in medical management. The indicator system demonstrates scientific weighting and credible results, providing a solid basis for evaluating medical students’ innovation literacy. It highlights the role of innovative thinking andoffers practical guidance for curriculum reform, resource allocation, and faculty development, with policy relevance and replicability across higher education contexts.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Binzhou Medical University (CN), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.