The Citation of the Laozi 老子 in Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要: Daoism and Political Legitimacy in Early Tang China

Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要, a crucial Tang compilation, played a central role in shaping state ideology and articulating shared beliefs. This article explores the inclusion of the Laozi and Heshang Gong’s commentary, highlighting how these texts were deliberately edited to meet the early Tang regime’s political and ideological needs. Through strategic commentary selection, omission and retention of passages, the compilers reshaped these texts into a narrative that reinforced state ideology and affirmed Tang political legitimacy. This process could be described as a “fusion of horizons”, where the original Laozi tradition merges with the compilers’ contemporary political concerns. By instrumentalizing the metaphysical Dao, reinterpreting self-governance, and reconciling Daoism with Confucianism, this narrative transformation reflects a significant political hermeneutic shift. The study demonstrates how early Tang intellectuals adapted classical texts to serve political agendas, offering insights into the interaction between cultural tradition and political legitimacy in early Tang China.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy East and West
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2025.a977851
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Citation of the Laozi 老子 in Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要: Daoism and Political Legitimacy in Early Tang China

Jiarui Guo
Philosophy East and West
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Citation of the Laozi 老子 in Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要: Daoism and Political Legitimacy in Early Tang China

Jiarui Guo
article en

Abstract

Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要, a crucial Tang compilation, played a central role in shaping state ideology and articulating shared beliefs. This article explores the inclusion of the Laozi and Heshang Gong’s commentary, highlighting how these texts were deliberately edited to meet the early Tang regime’s political and ideological needs. Through strategic commentary selection, omission and retention of passages, the compilers reshaped these texts into a narrative that reinforced state ideology and affirmed Tang political legitimacy. This process could be described as a “fusion of horizons”, where the original Laozi tradition merges with the compilers’ contemporary political concerns. By instrumentalizing the metaphysical Dao, reinterpreting self-governance, and reconciling Daoism with Confucianism, this narrative transformation reflects a significant political hermeneutic shift. The study demonstrates how early Tang intellectuals adapted classical texts to serve political agendas, offering insights into the interaction between cultural tradition and political legitimacy in early Tang China.

Philosophy East and West
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Citation of the Laozi 老子 in Qunshu zhiyao 群書治要: Daoism and Political Legitimacy in Early Tang China — Jiarui Guo · Philosophy East and West (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS