Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304‐40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA‐GMO‐ES‐2017‐147)

Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: GHB614, T304-40, GHB119 and COT102. The four-event-stack cotton expresses 2mEPSPS, Cry1Ab, Cry2Ae, Vip3Aa19 and PAT/bar to confer herbicide tolerance and insect resistance. Furthermore, event COT102 expresses the antimicrobial APH4 protein used during its molecular development. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single cotton events and did not identify safety concerns. Since then, no new data on the single cotton events were identified that would require modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment does not indicate interactions which would give rise to new food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack cotton, as described in this application, is as safe as its non-GM comparator and non-GM cotton varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of processed cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 or accidental spillage of viable GM cotton seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that four-event stack cotton is as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9752
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304‐40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA‐GMO‐ES‐2017‐147)

Giacomo De Sanctis, Paolo Lenzi, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Jean‐Luc Gallois et al.
EFSA Journal
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304‐40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA‐GMO‐ES‐2017‐147)

Giacomo De Sanctis, Paolo Lenzi, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Jean‐Luc Gallois, Ruud A. de Maagd, Francisco Barro, Alan H. Schulman, Antoine Messéan, Fabien Nogué, Tilemachos Goumperis, Frits Koning, Josep Casacuberta, Dafni Maria Kagkli, Pietro Piffanelli, Eve Veromann, Christoph C. Tebbe, Ana M. Camargo, Albert Braeuning, F. Javier Moreno, M. Epstein, Giovanni Savoini, Franco Maria Neri, Thomas Frenzel, Antonio Fernández Dumont, Michele Ardizzone, Andrea Gennaro, Tommaso Raffaello
article en

Abstract

Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: GHB614, T304-40, GHB119 and COT102. The four-event-stack cotton expresses 2mEPSPS, Cry1Ab, Cry2Ae, Vip3Aa19 and PAT/bar to confer herbicide tolerance and insect resistance. Furthermore, event COT102 expresses the antimicrobial APH4 protein used during its molecular development. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single cotton events and did not identify safety concerns. Since then, no new data on the single cotton events were identified that would require modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment does not indicate interactions which would give rise to new food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack cotton, as described in this application, is as safe as its non-GM comparator and non-GM cotton varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of processed cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 or accidental spillage of viable GM cotton seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that four-event stack cotton is as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(12)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.