China Shock Versus <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses?

ABSTRACT Studies have found that Chinese import competition (known as “China Shock”) and the COVID‐19 pandemic have caused a loss of jobs. Using state‐level panel data from 2017 to 2021, this paper finds that both Chinese import competition and COVID‐19 confirmed cases have had negative impacts on US manufacturing employment, but the impact of Chinese import competition has been larger. The findings are robust to additional controls and various specifications. The effects are heterogeneous by industry. Employment in the service sector has been significantly damaged by increasingly severe COVID‐19 but not directly affected by imports from China. By contrast, employment in labour‐intensive manufacturing industries has been more vulnerable to both Chinese import penetration and COVID‐19. The analysis finds heterogeneous impacts of the two factors in states with different economic conditions and reactions to the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70029
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China Shock Versus COVID ‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses?

Tian Wei, Yu Ji, Miaojie Yu
World Economy
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

China Shock Versus COVID ‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses?

Tian Wei, Yu Ji, Miaojie Yu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies have found that Chinese import competition (known as “China Shock”) and the COVID‐19 pandemic have caused a loss of jobs. Using state‐level panel data from 2017 to 2021, this paper finds that both Chinese import competition and COVID‐19 confirmed cases have had negative impacts on US manufacturing employment, but the impact of Chinese import competition has been larger. The findings are robust to additional controls and various specifications. The effects are heterogeneous by industry. Employment in the service sector has been significantly damaged by increasingly severe COVID‐19 but not directly affected by imports from China. By contrast, employment in labour‐intensive manufacturing industries has been more vulnerable to both Chinese import penetration and COVID‐19. The analysis finds heterogeneous impacts of the two factors in states with different economic conditions and reactions to the pandemic.

World EconomyVol. 49(1)
Peking University (CN), Economic Research Institute (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China Shock Versus <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses? — Tian Wei, Yu Ji, et al. · World Economy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS