Experiences of technology for increasing physical activity of older adults: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

Technologies used to increase older adults’ physical activity encourage more daily movement. Innovative tools such as wearable devices, mobile apps, and virtual reality enhance exercise and motivation, enabling more targeted, personalized programs through health monitoring. While previous reviews explored the impact of technology on older adults’ physical activity, this study provides a synthesis of primary qualitative research focusing on older adults’ experiences with these technologies, offering an in-depth understanding of barriers, facilitators, perceptions of usability, motivations, and subjective effects. This meta-synthesis aimed to analyze, synthesize, and interpret the qualitative literature on older adults’ experiences with technology to increase physical activity. This meta-synthesis conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases from inception to January 28, 2025. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research (JBI-QARI). Data synthesis was carried out using the thematic synthesis process developed by Thomas and Harden (2008). The reliability and credibility of the findings were assessed using the ConQual approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD420251035985]. A total of 371 findings obtained from the 16 included studies were grouped into seven categories, resulting in two synthesized findings: (1) older adults’ pathways to meaningful technology use for physical activity and (2) structural and personal limitations in digital health engagement. The participants in all included studies were aged 60 years and older, and 61.4% were female. The technologies used to enhance physical activity included various approaches such as mHealth, telehealth, exergames, virtual reality (e.g., VR, VIMINT), wearable devices (e.g., FitBit, WAM), and digital exercise platforms (e.g., Connect 60+, Kikoeru, Alexa, ProAct65+). This study highlighted that older adults’ engagement with technology-based physical activity programs is supported by social support, accessibility, user-friendly designs, and personalized features, while it is hindered by low motivation, health or mobility issues, social isolation, environmental barriers, and technical difficulties. Tailoring interventions to individual needs, providing technical support, ensuring privacy, promoting social interaction, and developing safe, accessible, and culturally sensitive activities are essential. Future research should focus on creating inclusive technologies that enhance older adults’ physical activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00394-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of technology for increasing physical activity of older adults: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

Ayşegül Ilgaz, Irem Huri Karabiyik
1 citations
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
article

Experiences of technology for increasing physical activity of older adults: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

Ayşegül Ilgaz, Irem Huri Karabiyik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Technologies used to increase older adults’ physical activity encourage more daily movement. Innovative tools such as wearable devices, mobile apps, and virtual reality enhance exercise and motivation, enabling more targeted, personalized programs through health monitoring. While previous reviews explored the impact of technology on older adults’ physical activity, this study provides a synthesis of primary qualitative research focusing on older adults’ experiences with these technologies, offering an in-depth understanding of barriers, facilitators, perceptions of usability, motivations, and subjective effects. This meta-synthesis aimed to analyze, synthesize, and interpret the qualitative literature on older adults’ experiences with technology to increase physical activity. This meta-synthesis conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases from inception to January 28, 2025. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research (JBI-QARI). Data synthesis was carried out using the thematic synthesis process developed by Thomas and Harden (2008). The reliability and credibility of the findings were assessed using the ConQual approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD420251035985]. A total of 371 findings obtained from the 16 included studies were grouped into seven categories, resulting in two synthesized findings: (1) older adults’ pathways to meaningful technology use for physical activity and (2) structural and personal limitations in digital health engagement. The participants in all included studies were aged 60 years and older, and 61.4% were female. The technologies used to enhance physical activity included various approaches such as mHealth, telehealth, exergames, virtual reality (e.g., VR, VIMINT), wearable devices (e.g., FitBit, WAM), and digital exercise platforms (e.g., Connect 60+, Kikoeru, Alexa, ProAct65+). This study highlighted that older adults’ engagement with technology-based physical activity programs is supported by social support, accessibility, user-friendly designs, and personalized features, while it is hindered by low motivation, health or mobility issues, social isolation, environmental barriers, and technical difficulties. Tailoring interventions to individual needs, providing technical support, ensuring privacy, promoting social interaction, and developing safe, accessible, and culturally sensitive activities are essential. Future research should focus on creating inclusive technologies that enhance older adults’ physical activity.

European Review of Aging and Physical ActivityVol. 23(1)
Akdeniz University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.