Gender Differences in Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide. Although TB incidence is consistently higher among men, it remains unclear whether gender disparities extend to TB treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of biological sex on TB treatment outcomes, including cure, treatment completion, default, relapse, treatment failure, lost to follow-up, transferred, and death. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 2004, and March 26, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies assessing gender differences in TB treatment outcomes. Results Eleven cohort studies involving 16,455 participants from Africa, Asia, and South America met the inclusion criteria. No significant gender differences were found for cure, treatment completion, default, relapse, or treatment failure. However, women were significantly less likely than men to be lost to follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.7), to be transferred during treatment (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48–0.92), or to die (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.97). All outcomes were rated as very low in certainty due to methodological limitations and uncontrolled confounding. Conclusions Although most TB treatment outcomes did not differ by gender, women had lower risks of treatment interruption and mortality. These findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive TB programs, particularly to improve treatment engagement and survival among men.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001532
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

Tae Eun Park, Haneul Seong
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Gender Differences in Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

Tae Eun Park, Haneul Seong
article en

Abstract

Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide. Although TB incidence is consistently higher among men, it remains unclear whether gender disparities extend to TB treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of biological sex on TB treatment outcomes, including cure, treatment completion, default, relapse, treatment failure, lost to follow-up, transferred, and death. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 2004, and March 26, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies assessing gender differences in TB treatment outcomes. Results Eleven cohort studies involving 16,455 participants from Africa, Asia, and South America met the inclusion criteria. No significant gender differences were found for cure, treatment completion, default, relapse, or treatment failure. However, women were significantly less likely than men to be lost to follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.7), to be transferred during treatment (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48–0.92), or to die (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.97). All outcomes were rated as very low in certainty due to methodological limitations and uncontrolled confounding. Conclusions Although most TB treatment outcomes did not differ by gender, women had lower risks of treatment interruption and mortality. These findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive TB programs, particularly to improve treatment engagement and survival among men.

Infectious Diseases in Clinical PracticeVol. 34(1)
Apple (Israel) (IL), Woosuk University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.