The Role of Double J Stenting in Nonobstructive Acute Pyelonephritis With Acute Kidney Injury

Background and objective There has been a paradigm shift in the clinical manifestations and renal outcomes of patients with nonobstructive acute pyelonephritis (NO-APN), with acute kidney injury (AKI) being a common complication. While the standard of care remains parenteral antibiotics, minimally invasive urologic procedures is still uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of double J (DJ) stenting in patients with NO-APN with AKI in promoting renal recovery, assessed by improvements in creatinine and inflammatory markers. Methods This retrospective study examined the renal outcomes of patients with NO-APN and AKI admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the treatment received: conservative management (Group A) and DJ stenting (Group B). Treatment outcomes were assessed in terms of renal recovery, sepsis resolution, and length of hospital stay. Additionally, a pre-specified subgroup analysis was conducted comparing Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Stage III AKI patients between Group A and Group B. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the conservative (Group A) and intervention (Group B) patients in terms of overall renal outcomes. However, in the subgroup analysis of Stage III AKI patients, those who underwent DJ stenting (Group B) demonstrated better treatment outcomes than the conservative group. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean total leukocyte count (TLC) (from 14,937.9 ± 5,275.5 cells/mm³ at admission to 11,656.3 ± 4,936.1 cells/mm³ at discharge, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and serum creatinine (from 3.46 ± 2.50 mg/dL at admission to 2.19 ± 1.93 mg/dL at discharge, <i>p</i> = 0.05) in Group B, while the duration of hospitalization was similar between groups. Conclusions DJ stenting can be considered a minimally invasive adjunct to intravenous antibiotics in cases of NO-APN with Stage III AKI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98501
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Double J Stenting in Nonobstructive Acute Pyelonephritis With Acute Kidney Injury

S. N. Sivanandam, Ram Prabahar M, Raniya Palliyedath, Veeramani Muthu et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Acute Kidney Injury Research
1.43
article

The Role of Double J Stenting in Nonobstructive Acute Pyelonephritis With Acute Kidney Injury

S. N. Sivanandam, Ram Prabahar M, Raniya Palliyedath, Veeramani Muthu, Jayanivash Jayam, C Nivedita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and objective There has been a paradigm shift in the clinical manifestations and renal outcomes of patients with nonobstructive acute pyelonephritis (NO-APN), with acute kidney injury (AKI) being a common complication. While the standard of care remains parenteral antibiotics, minimally invasive urologic procedures is still uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of double J (DJ) stenting in patients with NO-APN with AKI in promoting renal recovery, assessed by improvements in creatinine and inflammatory markers. Methods This retrospective study examined the renal outcomes of patients with NO-APN and AKI admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the treatment received: conservative management (Group A) and DJ stenting (Group B). Treatment outcomes were assessed in terms of renal recovery, sepsis resolution, and length of hospital stay. Additionally, a pre-specified subgroup analysis was conducted comparing Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Stage III AKI patients between Group A and Group B. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the conservative (Group A) and intervention (Group B) patients in terms of overall renal outcomes. However, in the subgroup analysis of Stage III AKI patients, those who underwent DJ stenting (Group B) demonstrated better treatment outcomes than the conservative group. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean total leukocyte count (TLC) (from 14,937.9 ± 5,275.5 cells/mm³ at admission to 11,656.3 ± 4,936.1 cells/mm³ at discharge, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and serum creatinine (from 3.46 ± 2.50 mg/dL at admission to 2.19 ± 1.93 mg/dL at discharge, <i>p</i> = 0.05) in Group B, while the duration of hospitalization was similar between groups. Conclusions DJ stenting can be considered a minimally invasive adjunct to intravenous antibiotics in cases of NO-APN with Stage III AKI.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Apollo Hospitals (IN), Apollo Hospitals (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.