Sub‐Watershed Prioritization Using Advanced Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Approaches for Proactive Flood Risk Management

ABSTRACT The study prioritizes sub‐watersheds (SWs) from the Taleqan Watershed in Iran based on Flood Generation Potential (FGP) using Multi‐Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches, including Condorcet, Borda scoring, Fallback bargaining algorithms (Game Theory [GT]), and Best‐Worst Method (BWM), and compares the results with observed discharge data. Based on a review of reliable resources, 30 geo‐environmental criteria were identified to prioritize FGP. Quantitative values for each criterion were then calculated for all SWs. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to reduce the FGP conditioning criteria. Next, using the decision matrix based on the selected criteria, three GT algorithms and BWM were applied, and the SWs were prioritized accordingly. FGP maps were then created using all four approaches, with results categorized into five classes, namely, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Finally, the prioritization patterns from the MCDM approaches were compared against observed discharge data from all 18 SWs to select the optimal method. The results from all four MCDM approaches indicated that SW5 had the highest potential for flood generation. The BWM approach classified about 56% of the study watershed as having low or very low FGP. In contrast, GT identified only 45% of the area in this category, with approximately 39% of SWs classified with high or very high FGP. The comparison of means using the One‐Way ANOVA test revealed insignificant differences between the MCDM approaches and the observed discharge data. However, the similarities between the results of the Condorcet, Borda scoring, Fallback bargaining, and BWM approaches, compared with the observed discharge data, were 27.78%, 27.78%, 33.33%, and 44.44%, respectively. Accordingly, the BWM approach with the highest similarity was chosen as the optimal model. The summary indicated that the BWM approach outperformed the GT algorithms in mapping flood generation compared to the observed flood discharge data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70163
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sub‐Watershed Prioritization Using Advanced Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Approaches for Proactive Flood Risk Management

Ali Nasiri Khiavi, Padideh Sadat Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, Michael Maerker et al.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Sub‐Watershed Prioritization Using Advanced Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Approaches for Proactive Flood Risk Management

Ali Nasiri Khiavi, Padideh Sadat Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, Michael Maerker, Mehdi Vafakhah, Azadeh Katebikord, Seyed Saeid Ghiasi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study prioritizes sub‐watersheds (SWs) from the Taleqan Watershed in Iran based on Flood Generation Potential (FGP) using Multi‐Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches, including Condorcet, Borda scoring, Fallback bargaining algorithms (Game Theory [GT]), and Best‐Worst Method (BWM), and compares the results with observed discharge data. Based on a review of reliable resources, 30 geo‐environmental criteria were identified to prioritize FGP. Quantitative values for each criterion were then calculated for all SWs. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to reduce the FGP conditioning criteria. Next, using the decision matrix based on the selected criteria, three GT algorithms and BWM were applied, and the SWs were prioritized accordingly. FGP maps were then created using all four approaches, with results categorized into five classes, namely, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Finally, the prioritization patterns from the MCDM approaches were compared against observed discharge data from all 18 SWs to select the optimal method. The results from all four MCDM approaches indicated that SW5 had the highest potential for flood generation. The BWM approach classified about 56% of the study watershed as having low or very low FGP. In contrast, GT identified only 45% of the area in this category, with approximately 39% of SWs classified with high or very high FGP. The comparison of means using the One‐Way ANOVA test revealed insignificant differences between the MCDM approaches and the observed discharge data. However, the similarities between the results of the Condorcet, Borda scoring, Fallback bargaining, and BWM approaches, compared with the observed discharge data, were 27.78%, 27.78%, 33.33%, and 44.44%, respectively. Accordingly, the BWM approach with the highest similarity was chosen as the optimal model. The summary indicated that the BWM approach outperformed the GT algorithms in mapping flood generation compared to the observed flood discharge data.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(4)
Tarbiat Modares University (IR), University of Pavia (IT), Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research (IR), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR)
National Science Foundation, Iran National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.