Impact of graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis strategies on <scp>GvHD</scp> ‐free/relapse‐free survival in young adults undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Young adults (YAs) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represent a unique population with distinct medical and psychosocial needs. Optimizing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in this population remains critical to improving outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of YAs undergoing unrelated donor HSCT using a contemporary Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) dataset. GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 24 months was evaluated across three GvHD prophylaxis strategies: Group A (post-transplant cyclophosphamide [PTCy] + calcineurin inhibitor [CNI] + mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]), Group B (CNI + methotrexate [MTX]/MMF), and Group C (CNI + MTX/MMF + anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted to adjust for baseline differences. A total of 1387 YA patients were included. In the total cohort, 24-month GRFS was 58.9% (confidence intervals [95% CI], 53-64) in Group A, 32.2% (95% CI, 29-36) in Group B and 44.2% (95% CI, 39-49) in Group C (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis (MVA), both Group A (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.54) and Group C (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90) showed improved GRFS compared to Group B. In the propensity score-matched cohort, GRFS at 24 months remained higher in the PTCy group (58.2%, 95% CI, 52-64) versus the CNI-MTX/MMF ± ATG group (32.9%, 95% CI, 27-39; p < 0.001), with PTCy independently associated with improved GRFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.60; p < 0.001). PTCy-based prophylaxis also reduced non-relapse mortality (NRM), with no significant differences in relapse or overall survival (OS) between groups. In this large, retrospective analysis, PTCy was associated with significantly improved GRFS and reduced NRM in YAs undergoing unrelated donor HSCT. These findings support the use of PTCy-based regimens in this population and warrant prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70269
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis strategies on GvHD ‐free/relapse‐free survival in young adults undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Nihar Desai, Igor Novitzky‐Basso, Eshrak Al‐Shaibani, Arjun Law et al.
British Journal of Haematology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Impact of graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis strategies on GvHD ‐free/relapse‐free survival in young adults undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Nihar Desai, Igor Novitzky‐Basso, Eshrak Al‐Shaibani, Arjun Law, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Sergio Rodríguez‐Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Young adults (YAs) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represent a unique population with distinct medical and psychosocial needs. Optimizing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in this population remains critical to improving outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of YAs undergoing unrelated donor HSCT using a contemporary Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) dataset. GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 24 months was evaluated across three GvHD prophylaxis strategies: Group A (post-transplant cyclophosphamide [PTCy] + calcineurin inhibitor [CNI] + mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]), Group B (CNI + methotrexate [MTX]/MMF), and Group C (CNI + MTX/MMF + anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted to adjust for baseline differences. A total of 1387 YA patients were included. In the total cohort, 24-month GRFS was 58.9% (confidence intervals [95% CI], 53-64) in Group A, 32.2% (95% CI, 29-36) in Group B and 44.2% (95% CI, 39-49) in Group C (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis (MVA), both Group A (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.54) and Group C (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90) showed improved GRFS compared to Group B. In the propensity score-matched cohort, GRFS at 24 months remained higher in the PTCy group (58.2%, 95% CI, 52-64) versus the CNI-MTX/MMF ± ATG group (32.9%, 95% CI, 27-39; p < 0.001), with PTCy independently associated with improved GRFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.60; p < 0.001). PTCy-based prophylaxis also reduced non-relapse mortality (NRM), with no significant differences in relapse or overall survival (OS) between groups. In this large, retrospective analysis, PTCy was associated with significantly improved GRFS and reduced NRM in YAs undergoing unrelated donor HSCT. These findings support the use of PTCy-based regimens in this population and warrant prospective evaluation.

British Journal of HaematologyVol. 208(2)
University of Toronto (CA), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
Health Resources and Services Administration, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Office of Naval Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.