An overview of textural, compositional and genetic relationships between magmatic enclaves and their host granitic rocks

Magmatic enclaves (MEs) mainly represent small, variably shaped bodies of different, commonly more mafic, magmas that coexisted with their host granitic magmas. There are least eight different types of relationship that could potentially exist or develop between them and their hosts. Examples of most of these possible types exist. However, from a global perspective, enclave–host relationships that betray true magma mixing are uncommon. Most MEs represent forms of magma mingling but, whatever their parental origin, are commonly internally hybridized to varying extents with their host magmas, through chemical and/or mechanical processes. However, because the host magma volumes are usually many orders of magnitude greater than those of the ME magmas, the host magma compositions remain little affected. Many granitic rocks contain MEs that correspond to numerous different magma injections and can also contain MEs that exhibit combinations of the simple types identified here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2025-057
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An overview of textural, compositional and genetic relationships between magmatic enclaves and their host granitic rocks

J. D. Clemens
Journal of the Geological Society
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

An overview of textural, compositional and genetic relationships between magmatic enclaves and their host granitic rocks

J. D. Clemens
article en

Abstract

Magmatic enclaves (MEs) mainly represent small, variably shaped bodies of different, commonly more mafic, magmas that coexisted with their host granitic magmas. There are least eight different types of relationship that could potentially exist or develop between them and their hosts. Examples of most of these possible types exist. However, from a global perspective, enclave–host relationships that betray true magma mixing are uncommon. Most MEs represent forms of magma mingling but, whatever their parental origin, are commonly internally hybridized to varying extents with their host magmas, through chemical and/or mechanical processes. However, because the host magma volumes are usually many orders of magnitude greater than those of the ME magmas, the host magma compositions remain little affected. Many granitic rocks contain MEs that correspond to numerous different magma injections and can also contain MEs that exhibit combinations of the simple types identified here.

Journal of the Geological SocietyVol. 183(3)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An overview of textural, compositional and genetic relationships between magmatic enclaves and their host granitic rocks — J. D. Clemens · Journal of the Geological Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS