Antebellum School Funds: How Elites Encouraged Non-slaveholding Whites’ Cooperation in Repressing Enslaved Americans

Abstract Elites in the antebellum U.S. South faced persistent protest by enslaved Americans. Elites sought to quell that threat through policing, but success relied on the participation of non-slaveholding Whites. I hypothesize that elites encouraged non-slaveholders’ compliance by offering policy concessions, specifically, school funding. Novel data from North Carolina show that the state distributed more school funds to counties where more enslaved people lived, and that elites in those counties raised more school taxes. I then proxy for slave escape with the location of escape routes and find that elites also raised more taxes in densely enslaved counties containing escape routes. Alternative explanations rooted in electoral incentives or education preferences cannot account for the funding patterns, and data from the 1850 U.S. census suggest that the theory may extend to the rest of the South. The paper illustrates how elites can leverage public funds to preserve power in ethnically diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in American Political Development
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x25100254
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antebellum School Funds: How Elites Encouraged Non-slaveholding Whites’ Cooperation in Repressing Enslaved Americans

Trellace Marie Lawrimore
Studies in American Political Development
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
article

Antebellum School Funds: How Elites Encouraged Non-slaveholding Whites’ Cooperation in Repressing Enslaved Americans

Trellace Marie Lawrimore
article en

Abstract

Abstract Elites in the antebellum U.S. South faced persistent protest by enslaved Americans. Elites sought to quell that threat through policing, but success relied on the participation of non-slaveholding Whites. I hypothesize that elites encouraged non-slaveholders’ compliance by offering policy concessions, specifically, school funding. Novel data from North Carolina show that the state distributed more school funds to counties where more enslaved people lived, and that elites in those counties raised more school taxes. I then proxy for slave escape with the location of escape routes and find that elites also raised more taxes in densely enslaved counties containing escape routes. Alternative explanations rooted in electoral incentives or education preferences cannot account for the funding patterns, and data from the 1850 U.S. census suggest that the theory may extend to the rest of the South. The paper illustrates how elites can leverage public funds to preserve power in ethnically diverse settings.

Studies in American Political Development
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Antebellum School Funds: How Elites Encouraged Non-slaveholding Whites’ Cooperation in Repressing Enslaved Americans — Trellace Marie Lawrimore · Studies in American Political Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS