Communication skills in pediatrics: validation of a training course for students

In pediatrics, effective communication requires empathy, active engagement with the child and their family, and a mutual sense of trust. Difficulties in communication and low confidence among medical students when interviewing pediatric patients may be associated with the lack of formal training in communication skills during undergraduate education and the limited integration of this content into medical curricula. To develop, validate, and implement a pediatric communication skills course for medical students, evaluating its effectiveness, acceptance, and impact on students’ self-perception and performance. This is a methodological study developed in five stages: (1) Course design, based on leading protocols and literature on pediatric communication, and guided by gaps identified in a prior study on students’ perceptions of communication skills in pediatrics; (2) Content validation using the Delphi technique, with 11 experts evaluating the adequacy of course elements; (3) Pilot testing to adjust the course structure and teaching strategies; (4) Course implementation with 27 eighth-semester medical students, delivered as a voluntary extension activity; and (5) Evaluation using quantitative tools, and statistical analysis. All participants signed informed consent and assent forms. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The course was developed based on established protocols and validated by 11 experts through the Delphi technique, achieving high content validity (CVI > 0.8). In the pilot phase, the course was well accepted, deemed relevant to its purpose (I-CVI = 1.0), and was recommended by the participants. In the subsequent administration with 27 students, all scored above 80% on the post-test. There was a significant improvement in students’ self-perceived communication skills, particularly in opening the discussion, gathering information, and understanding the patient’s and family’s perspective. Statistical analysis showed a significant association between increased confidence and the ability to interview children (p < 0.0001), caregivers (p = 0.0052) and adolescents (p = 0.0032), and communicate effectively (p = 0.0005). The pediatric communication skills course developed and validated in this study proved to be an effective and well-accepted intervention to enhance medical students’ communication competencies. Expert validation ensured content quality, while implementation with students demonstrated significant gains in performance and confidence for clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08407-w
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication skills in pediatrics: validation of a training course for students

Glenia Junqueira Machado Medeiros, Simone Appenzeller
BMC Medical Education
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Communication skills in pediatrics: validation of a training course for students

Glenia Junqueira Machado Medeiros, Simone Appenzeller
article en

Abstract

In pediatrics, effective communication requires empathy, active engagement with the child and their family, and a mutual sense of trust. Difficulties in communication and low confidence among medical students when interviewing pediatric patients may be associated with the lack of formal training in communication skills during undergraduate education and the limited integration of this content into medical curricula. To develop, validate, and implement a pediatric communication skills course for medical students, evaluating its effectiveness, acceptance, and impact on students’ self-perception and performance. This is a methodological study developed in five stages: (1) Course design, based on leading protocols and literature on pediatric communication, and guided by gaps identified in a prior study on students’ perceptions of communication skills in pediatrics; (2) Content validation using the Delphi technique, with 11 experts evaluating the adequacy of course elements; (3) Pilot testing to adjust the course structure and teaching strategies; (4) Course implementation with 27 eighth-semester medical students, delivered as a voluntary extension activity; and (5) Evaluation using quantitative tools, and statistical analysis. All participants signed informed consent and assent forms. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The course was developed based on established protocols and validated by 11 experts through the Delphi technique, achieving high content validity (CVI > 0.8). In the pilot phase, the course was well accepted, deemed relevant to its purpose (I-CVI = 1.0), and was recommended by the participants. In the subsequent administration with 27 students, all scored above 80% on the post-test. There was a significant improvement in students’ self-perceived communication skills, particularly in opening the discussion, gathering information, and understanding the patient’s and family’s perspective. Statistical analysis showed a significant association between increased confidence and the ability to interview children (p < 0.0001), caregivers (p = 0.0052) and adolescents (p = 0.0032), and communicate effectively (p = 0.0005). The pediatric communication skills course developed and validated in this study proved to be an effective and well-accepted intervention to enhance medical students’ communication competencies. Expert validation ensured content quality, while implementation with students demonstrated significant gains in performance and confidence for clinical practice.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.