Public spending on immunisation in Poland

With 1.7% of its healthcare budget allocated to prevention and 0.5% to vaccinations, Poland remains a country that invests relatively little in preventive measures. Given the high return on investment in immunisation-through reductions in both direct and indirect costs and in severe outcomes-increased and sustainable public funding for vaccination should be prioritised by healthcare policymakers. Sustainable public investment is crucial to addressing key immunisation challenges: low coverage, delayed introduction of cost-effective vaccines and service quality gaps. Rather than being driven by international expenditure comparisons, this investment should be justified by the evidence-based potential of immunisation to reduce the health and economic burden of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1682169
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public spending on immunisation in Poland

Joanna Augustyńska, Michał Seweryn, Justyna Kopel, Iwona Paradowska‐Stankiewicz et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Public spending on immunisation in Poland

Joanna Augustyńska, Michał Seweryn, Justyna Kopel, Iwona Paradowska‐Stankiewicz, Rafał Jaworski, Marcin Czech, Alicja Wójcik
article en

Abstract

With 1.7% of its healthcare budget allocated to prevention and 0.5% to vaccinations, Poland remains a country that invests relatively little in preventive measures. Given the high return on investment in immunisation-through reductions in both direct and indirect costs and in severe outcomes-increased and sustainable public funding for vaccination should be prioritised by healthcare policymakers. Sustainable public investment is crucial to addressing key immunisation challenges: low coverage, delayed introduction of cost-effective vaccines and service quality gaps. Rather than being driven by international expenditure comparisons, this investment should be justified by the evidence-based potential of immunisation to reduce the health and economic burden of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL), EC Systems (Poland) (PL), Mother and Child Foundation (GB), MSP (Poland) (PL), Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.