Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 6)

ABSTRACT This 6th annual Emerging PV Report surveys peer‐reviewed advances since August 2024 across perovskite, organic, kesterite, matildite, antimony seleno‐sulfide, selenium, and tandem solar cell architectures. Updated graphs, tables, and analyses compile the best‐performing devices from the emerging‐pv.org database, benchmarking power conversion efficiency ( PCE ), flexible photovoltaic fatigue factor ( F ), light‐utilization efficiency ( LUE ), and stability‐test energy yield (STEY) against detailed‐balance efficiency limits as functions of photovoltaic bandgap, and average visible transmittance ( AVT ) for (semi‐)transparent devices. Beyond efficiency, operational stability is assessed via degradation rates ( DR ) and t 95 lifetimes. Highlights include single‐junction perovskite cells with efficiencies above 27%, organics surpassing 20%, and new Si/perovskite tandems exceeding 34%. Although multiple record efficiencies have been achieved this year, advances in mechanical robustness and operational stability remain inconsistent, especially in complex tandem stacks, emphasizing the urgent need for standardized protocols, improved large‐area homogeneity, and database‐driven benchmarks to accelerate the transition from laboratory demonstrations to scalable, real‐world deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202505525
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Perovskite Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 6)

Christoph Josef Brabec, Christian Sprau, Luigi Angelo Castriotta, Takao Someya et al.
1 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Perovskite Materials and Applications
0.73
article

Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 6)

Christoph Josef Brabec, Christian Sprau, Luigi Angelo Castriotta, Takao Someya, Nam‐Gyu Park, Carlos I. Cabrera, David B. Mitzi, Derya Baran, Maria Antonietta Loi, Thomas Kirchartz, Xavier Mathew, Fei Guo, René A. J. Janssen, Jie Min, T. Jesper Jacobsson, Bruno Ehrler, Richard R. Lunt, Anita W. Y. Ho-Baillie, Sule Erten‐Ela, Barry P. Rand, Kenjiro Fukuda, Osbel Almora, Jens Hauch, Ana F. Nogueira, Henry James Snaith, Ulrich W. Paetzold, Agustín O. Alvarez, Lulu Sun, Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin, Karen Forberich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This 6th annual Emerging PV Report surveys peer‐reviewed advances since August 2024 across perovskite, organic, kesterite, matildite, antimony seleno‐sulfide, selenium, and tandem solar cell architectures. Updated graphs, tables, and analyses compile the best‐performing devices from the emerging‐pv.org database, benchmarking power conversion efficiency ( PCE ), flexible photovoltaic fatigue factor ( F ), light‐utilization efficiency ( LUE ), and stability‐test energy yield (STEY) against detailed‐balance efficiency limits as functions of photovoltaic bandgap, and average visible transmittance ( AVT ) for (semi‐)transparent devices. Beyond efficiency, operational stability is assessed via degradation rates ( DR ) and t 95 lifetimes. Highlights include single‐junction perovskite cells with efficiencies above 27%, organics surpassing 20%, and new Si/perovskite tandems exceeding 34%. Although multiple record efficiencies have been achieved this year, advances in mechanical robustness and operational stability remain inconsistent, especially in complex tandem stacks, emphasizing the urgent need for standardized protocols, improved large‐area homogeneity, and database‐driven benchmarks to accelerate the transition from laboratory demonstrations to scalable, real‐world deployment.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 16(7)
Linköping University (SE), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), The University of Sydney (AU), Tokyo University of Information Sciences (JP), Jinan University (CN), University of Groningen (NL), Duke University (US), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Princeton University (US), Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (NL), Wuhan University (CN), University of Oxford (GB), Ege University (TR), Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), RIKEN Advanced Science Institute (JP), RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (JP), Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research (NL), Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" (MX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Michigan State University (US), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), The University of Osaka (JP)
National Science Foundation, Solar Technologies go Hybrid, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Vector Stiftung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Perovskite Materials and Applications
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.