Celfib-AI: A machine learning model to predict bone marrow fibrosis and cellularity from complete blood count – a multicenter model development and validation study in France

Abstract Introduction Bone marrow biopsy is an essential component of the WHO diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, it remains an invasive procedure that can be difficult to perform in elderly or anticoagulated patients. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict two key and reproducible histopathological findings from bone marrow biopsy—grade 2–3 fibrosis and overall cellularity—using complete blood count (CBC) data in patients with suspected or confirmed MPNs. Methods Histopathological and CBC data from 1,691 bone marrow biopsies performed at diagnosis or during follow-up were retrospectively collected across 10 French university hospitals (Lyon n=761; Brest n=214; Grenoble n=154; Clermont-Ferrand n=127; Nancy n=127; Paris–Mondor n=102; Saint-Étienne n=71; Bordeaux n=61; Paris–Kremlin-Bicêtre (Paris-KB) n=48; Nantes n=26). Thirty-three CBC variables and patient age at biopsy were used as predictors. For each case, histological findings were controlled by a referent pathologist. Equivocal cases underwent central consensus review by an expert panel (GEBOM group). Data from six centers (Lyon, Grenoble, Paris–KB, Clermont-Ferrand, Nantes, Bordeaux) were used for model development and split into training (75%) and internal test (25%) cohorts, stratified by center and fibrosis grade. The remaining four centers were used for external validation. After model selection, an additional prospective “real-life” series of 144 consecutive biopsies performed for any indication in Lyon was evaluated. Linear (GLM, Lasso, Elastic-Net), support-vector machine (SVM), tree-based (XGboost, Random Forest), Bayesian (Naïve Bayes), neural network (neural net) and tabular foundation (tabFPN) models were evaluated to predict bone marrow fibrosis (binary model: no significant fibrosis vs. grade 2–3 fibrosis) and cellularity (multiclass model: decreased, normal, increased), using 10-fold cross-validation on the training set. The best model was selected based on its performance on the internal test set and further evaluated on the external validation sets and the prospective cohort. Results Among the 1,691 evaluated bone marrow biopsies, histopathological diagnosis was essential thrombocythemia (n=625, 37.0%), not MPN (n=380, 22.5%), primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n=220, 13.0%), polycythemia vera (n=186, 11.0%), secondary myelofibrosis (n=126, 7.5%), pre-PMF (n=81, 4.8%), and unclassifiable MPN or MDS/MPN overlap (n=72, 4.3%). Among MPN patients, the main driver mutations were JAK2V617F (n=886, 67.6%), CALR (n=205, 15.6%), MPL (n=51, 3.9%) and triple negative status (n=129, 9.8%). The XGBoost binary model achieved the best performance for fibrosis prediction, with an AUROC [95% CI] of 0.96 [0.95–0.97] in the training set and 0.91 [0.86–0.95] in the internal test set. Performance was confirmed in validation cohorts with complete CBC data (Paris–Mondor (AUROC 0.94 [0.89-1.00]) and Nancy (0.98 [0.96–1.00])), and remained robust even with partially missing data (Brest, lacking erythroblast count, circulating myeloid precursors, IDR, and MPV (AUROC 0.84 [0.76–0.92]), and Saint-Étienne, missing MPV and IDR (AUROC 0.83 [0.74–0.93])). Prospective evaluation in real-life setting revealed an AUROC of 0.96 [0.92-0.99] and an accuracy of 88% [81.9-92.4] in the Lyon-prospective cohort. Sensitivity analyses showed stable model performance with as few as 10 variables, including (in order of importance): circulating myeloid precursors percentage and count, erythroblast percentage, hemoglobin level, IDR, MPV, white blood cells count, monocyte percentage, age and MCH. For cellularity prediction, the multiclass XGboost model demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance, with AUROC [95%CI] for decreased / normal / increased cellularity of 0.90 [0.89-0.92] / 0.86 [0.84-0.89] / 0.89 [0.87-0.91] in the training set and 0.72 [0.63-0.8] / 0.76 [0.7-0.80] / 0.81 [0.76-0.86] in testing set, respectively. Conclusion These findings indicate that grade 2–3 bone marrow fibrosis can be accurately predicted using routine CBC parameters and an XGBoost model in patients with suspected or confirmed MPNs. Predictive modeling of bone marrow cellularity yielded lower yet interesting accuracy. A web-based tool designed for routine clinical use is currently under development under evaluation in a prospective setting across 4 independent centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3801
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Celfib-AI: A machine learning model to predict bone marrow fibrosis and cellularity from complete blood count – a multicenter model development and validation study in France

Lydia Roy, Lila Gilis, Jean‐Christophe Ianotto, Vincent Alcazer et al.
Blood
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Celfib-AI: A machine learning model to predict bone marrow fibrosis and cellularity from complete blood count – a multicenter model development and validation study in France

Lydia Roy, Lila Gilis, Jean‐Christophe Ianotto, Vincent Alcazer, Simon Chevalier, Marion Eveillard, Silvia Maria Bezsera, C. Aubert, Laurent Jallades, Sabrina Barrière, Marie Donzel, Olivier Mansier, Pierre Sujobert, N Yilmaz, Fiorenza Barraco, Elsa Poullot, Simona Pagliuca, Laurence Legros, Mathias Brehon, Éric Lippert, Dana Ranta, Nicolas Freynet, Pascale Flandrin‐Gresta, Hélène Labussière-Wallet, Xavier Hittinger, Alexandra Traverse Glehen, Sarah Zouaghi, Seddig MOMENKHAN, Syrine KHEDIMALLAH
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Bone marrow biopsy is an essential component of the WHO diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, it remains an invasive procedure that can be difficult to perform in elderly or anticoagulated patients. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict two key and reproducible histopathological findings from bone marrow biopsy—grade 2–3 fibrosis and overall cellularity—using complete blood count (CBC) data in patients with suspected or confirmed MPNs. Methods Histopathological and CBC data from 1,691 bone marrow biopsies performed at diagnosis or during follow-up were retrospectively collected across 10 French university hospitals (Lyon n=761; Brest n=214; Grenoble n=154; Clermont-Ferrand n=127; Nancy n=127; Paris–Mondor n=102; Saint-Étienne n=71; Bordeaux n=61; Paris–Kremlin-Bicêtre (Paris-KB) n=48; Nantes n=26). Thirty-three CBC variables and patient age at biopsy were used as predictors. For each case, histological findings were controlled by a referent pathologist. Equivocal cases underwent central consensus review by an expert panel (GEBOM group). Data from six centers (Lyon, Grenoble, Paris–KB, Clermont-Ferrand, Nantes, Bordeaux) were used for model development and split into training (75%) and internal test (25%) cohorts, stratified by center and fibrosis grade. The remaining four centers were used for external validation. After model selection, an additional prospective “real-life” series of 144 consecutive biopsies performed for any indication in Lyon was evaluated. Linear (GLM, Lasso, Elastic-Net), support-vector machine (SVM), tree-based (XGboost, Random Forest), Bayesian (Naïve Bayes), neural network (neural net) and tabular foundation (tabFPN) models were evaluated to predict bone marrow fibrosis (binary model: no significant fibrosis vs. grade 2–3 fibrosis) and cellularity (multiclass model: decreased, normal, increased), using 10-fold cross-validation on the training set. The best model was selected based on its performance on the internal test set and further evaluated on the external validation sets and the prospective cohort. Results Among the 1,691 evaluated bone marrow biopsies, histopathological diagnosis was essential thrombocythemia (n=625, 37.0%), not MPN (n=380, 22.5%), primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n=220, 13.0%), polycythemia vera (n=186, 11.0%), secondary myelofibrosis (n=126, 7.5%), pre-PMF (n=81, 4.8%), and unclassifiable MPN or MDS/MPN overlap (n=72, 4.3%). Among MPN patients, the main driver mutations were JAK2V617F (n=886, 67.6%), CALR (n=205, 15.6%), MPL (n=51, 3.9%) and triple negative status (n=129, 9.8%). The XGBoost binary model achieved the best performance for fibrosis prediction, with an AUROC [95% CI] of 0.96 [0.95–0.97] in the training set and 0.91 [0.86–0.95] in the internal test set. Performance was confirmed in validation cohorts with complete CBC data (Paris–Mondor (AUROC 0.94 [0.89-1.00]) and Nancy (0.98 [0.96–1.00])), and remained robust even with partially missing data (Brest, lacking erythroblast count, circulating myeloid precursors, IDR, and MPV (AUROC 0.84 [0.76–0.92]), and Saint-Étienne, missing MPV and IDR (AUROC 0.83 [0.74–0.93])). Prospective evaluation in real-life setting revealed an AUROC of 0.96 [0.92-0.99] and an accuracy of 88% [81.9-92.4] in the Lyon-prospective cohort. Sensitivity analyses showed stable model performance with as few as 10 variables, including (in order of importance): circulating myeloid precursors percentage and count, erythroblast percentage, hemoglobin level, IDR, MPV, white blood cells count, monocyte percentage, age and MCH. For cellularity prediction, the multiclass XGboost model demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance, with AUROC [95%CI] for decreased / normal / increased cellularity of 0.90 [0.89-0.92] / 0.86 [0.84-0.89] / 0.89 [0.87-0.91] in the training set and 0.72 [0.63-0.8] / 0.76 [0.7-0.80] / 0.81 [0.76-0.86] in testing set, respectively. Conclusion These findings indicate that grade 2–3 bone marrow fibrosis can be accurately predicted using routine CBC parameters and an XGBoost model in patients with suspected or confirmed MPNs. Predictive modeling of bone marrow cellularity yielded lower yet interesting accuracy. A web-based tool designed for routine clinical use is currently under development under evaluation in a prospective setting across 4 independent centers.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Sciences Po Bordeaux (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR), Hôpital Lyon Sud (FR), Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (FR), Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.