Real-world outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors in the frontline setting

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations occur in 3-5% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Selective IDH1/2 inhibitors including ivosidenib (IDH1), olutasidenib (IDH1), and enasidenib (IDH2) are currently approved for IDH1/2-mutated (mIDH1/2) relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia; ivosidenib is also approved for mIDH1 r/r MDS based on clinical benefit observed in 18 patients on trial AG120-C-001. However, there are limited prospective clinical trial or real-world data for IDH inhibitors in treatment-naïve MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Methods: This was a retrospective, single-institution analysis of mIDH1/2 MDS and CMML patients treated with an IDH inhibitor in the frontline setting between 05/2018-09/2024. Patients previously treated with venetoclax (VEN) or a hypomethylating agent (HMA) were excluded. The primary outcomes of interest were treatment response based on the 2023 modified International Working Group criteria for MDS and rates of peripheral blood (PB)-complete remission (CR) (Stampfl-Mattesberger, Blood, 2021). Secondary objectives included time to best response, evaluation of transfusion independence (TI) pre/post-IDH1/2 therapy, rates of IDH1/2 variant allele frequency (VAF) reduction, rates of differentiation syndrome (DS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Our cohort (n=16) included 7 mIDH1, and 9 mIDH2 patients (13 MDS, 3 CMML) of which 14 (87.5%) were male, and 13 (81.3%) were White. The median age at diagnosis was 78 years (range [r], 55-91), with 7 (43.8%) patients >80 and 3 were ≥90 years old. Eleven (68.8%) had high-risk disease by IPSS-R (>3.5) and IPSS-M (>0). The most common IDH1 and IDH2 variants were R132H (28.6%) and R140Q (44.4%), respectively. The median VAF of IDH1 was 29.3% (r, 9.4-46.6) and 35.8% (r, 18.1-42) for IDH2. Most (75%) of our cohort received an IDH1/2 inhibitor as monotherapy while 3 (18.8%) received it in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Among patients with lower risk disease, the most common reason for treatment initiation was neutropenia. The median follow-up was 16.5 months, and the median treatment duration was 10 months for both mIDH1 and mIDH2 patients. Of those who received at least one cycle, 9 (56.3%) had BM evaluations (BME), of which 44.4% achieved CR, 22.2% achieved CR with limited count recovery (CRl), 11.1% achieved CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), and 22.2% did not respond. Eight (50%) patients achieved PB-CR. Median times to best response (PB or BM) among mIDH1/2 patients were 100 days (r, 56-527) and 85 days (r, 27-240), respectively. Of the 9 patients who were TD prior to IDH1/2 therapy, 6 (66.7%) achieved TI. Nine mIDH1/2 patients had sequential next-generation sequencing (NGS) by BM, and 5 (55.5%) had VAF reduction, though none achieved mutation clearance. DS was suspected in 18.8%, most (66.7%) within the first 90 days of treatment. Only one patient discontinued treatment permanently despite resolution of symptoms without glucocorticoids due to a comorbid substance use disorder. Four (25%) patients underwent stem cell transplantation (HCT), in 1 of whom received IDH1 inhibitor as monotherapy. The median OS was 26 months for the entire cohort and the median OS for patients >80 years was also 26 months. There was a trend toward higher hazard of death for patients receiving IDH inhibitor monotherapy versus in combination with HMA (HR 1.87; 95% CI, 0.47–7.38), and a trend for improved OS when stratified by HCT (HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.09-2.29). Conclusion: This study highlights safety and efficacy of IDH inhibitors, particularly among older adults with treatment-naïve MDS or CMML. Nearly half of our cohort were adults >80 years, a group often underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. The overall response rate (CR + CRl + CRh) was 88.9% among 9 patients with BME; 50% of the entire cohort achieved PB-CR and median OS was 26 months. Of those who were previously transfusion dependent, 66.7% achieved TI and rate of DS (18.8%) was comparable to historical prospective data. We are continuing to examine days alive out of hospital as a patient-centered outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-8171
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors in the frontline setting

Cilomar Martins de Oliveira Filho, Philip C. Amrein, Andrew Mark Brunner, Rupa Narayan et al.
1 citations
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
article

Real-world outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors in the frontline setting

Cilomar Martins de Oliveira Filho, Philip C. Amrein, Andrew Mark Brunner, Rupa Narayan, Gabriela Hobbs, Amir Fathi, Hanno Hock, Michelle Lee, Alifya Lokhandwala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations occur in 3-5% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Selective IDH1/2 inhibitors including ivosidenib (IDH1), olutasidenib (IDH1), and enasidenib (IDH2) are currently approved for IDH1/2-mutated (mIDH1/2) relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia; ivosidenib is also approved for mIDH1 r/r MDS based on clinical benefit observed in 18 patients on trial AG120-C-001. However, there are limited prospective clinical trial or real-world data for IDH inhibitors in treatment-naïve MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Methods: This was a retrospective, single-institution analysis of mIDH1/2 MDS and CMML patients treated with an IDH inhibitor in the frontline setting between 05/2018-09/2024. Patients previously treated with venetoclax (VEN) or a hypomethylating agent (HMA) were excluded. The primary outcomes of interest were treatment response based on the 2023 modified International Working Group criteria for MDS and rates of peripheral blood (PB)-complete remission (CR) (Stampfl-Mattesberger, Blood, 2021). Secondary objectives included time to best response, evaluation of transfusion independence (TI) pre/post-IDH1/2 therapy, rates of IDH1/2 variant allele frequency (VAF) reduction, rates of differentiation syndrome (DS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Our cohort (n=16) included 7 mIDH1, and 9 mIDH2 patients (13 MDS, 3 CMML) of which 14 (87.5%) were male, and 13 (81.3%) were White. The median age at diagnosis was 78 years (range [r], 55-91), with 7 (43.8%) patients >80 and 3 were ≥90 years old. Eleven (68.8%) had high-risk disease by IPSS-R (>3.5) and IPSS-M (>0). The most common IDH1 and IDH2 variants were R132H (28.6%) and R140Q (44.4%), respectively. The median VAF of IDH1 was 29.3% (r, 9.4-46.6) and 35.8% (r, 18.1-42) for IDH2. Most (75%) of our cohort received an IDH1/2 inhibitor as monotherapy while 3 (18.8%) received it in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Among patients with lower risk disease, the most common reason for treatment initiation was neutropenia. The median follow-up was 16.5 months, and the median treatment duration was 10 months for both mIDH1 and mIDH2 patients. Of those who received at least one cycle, 9 (56.3%) had BM evaluations (BME), of which 44.4% achieved CR, 22.2% achieved CR with limited count recovery (CRl), 11.1% achieved CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), and 22.2% did not respond. Eight (50%) patients achieved PB-CR. Median times to best response (PB or BM) among mIDH1/2 patients were 100 days (r, 56-527) and 85 days (r, 27-240), respectively. Of the 9 patients who were TD prior to IDH1/2 therapy, 6 (66.7%) achieved TI. Nine mIDH1/2 patients had sequential next-generation sequencing (NGS) by BM, and 5 (55.5%) had VAF reduction, though none achieved mutation clearance. DS was suspected in 18.8%, most (66.7%) within the first 90 days of treatment. Only one patient discontinued treatment permanently despite resolution of symptoms without glucocorticoids due to a comorbid substance use disorder. Four (25%) patients underwent stem cell transplantation (HCT), in 1 of whom received IDH1 inhibitor as monotherapy. The median OS was 26 months for the entire cohort and the median OS for patients >80 years was also 26 months. There was a trend toward higher hazard of death for patients receiving IDH inhibitor monotherapy versus in combination with HMA (HR 1.87; 95% CI, 0.47–7.38), and a trend for improved OS when stratified by HCT (HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.09-2.29). Conclusion: This study highlights safety and efficacy of IDH inhibitors, particularly among older adults with treatment-naïve MDS or CMML. Nearly half of our cohort were adults >80 years, a group often underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. The overall response rate (CR + CRl + CRh) was 88.9% among 9 patients with BME; 50% of the entire cohort achieved PB-CR and median OS was 26 months. Of those who were previously transfusion dependent, 66.7% achieved TI and rate of DS (18.8%) was comparable to historical prospective data. We are continuing to examine days alive out of hospital as a patient-centered outcome.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.