Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a US healthcare claims database

Treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have expanded, but real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes remain limited. This study examined real-world outcomes in DLBCL patients treated between 10/1/2015 and 6/30/2024. Patients were stratified by lines of therapy (LOT) and treatments (1L rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP]; 2L stem cell transplant [SCT]; and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR T] therapy (any LOT). Variables were reported descriptively. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. LOT data from 9875 patients were included. R-CHOP-based regimens were the most common 1L treatment (61.7%-67.3% in 2016-2023; 49.4% in 2024). Conventional chemoimmunotherapy use decreased in 2L (81.6% in 2016 to 41.9% in 2024) and 3L (47.6% in 2016 to 22.1% in 2024), while novel therapies increased (43.0% in 2L and 55.9% in 3L in 2024). Median overall survival declined across LOT (1L: 58.1 months; 2L: 30.0 months), as did median time to next treatment (1L: 36.1 months; 2L: 10.6 months). Twelve-month treatment failure rates were 36.0% after 1L, 51.8% after 2L, and 42.2% after CAR T. Among CAR T recipients, 93 received one of 36 distinct subsequent regimens, indicating no standard of care. These findings highlight the unmet needs in DLBCL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01412-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a US healthcare claims database

Pei‐Chao Lin, Mazyar Shadman, Gloria HJ Graf, Chang Xu et al.
1 citations
Blood Cancer Journal
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.47
article

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a US healthcare claims database

Pei‐Chao Lin, Mazyar Shadman, Gloria HJ Graf, Chang Xu, Alex Bokun, Xiaoxiao Lu, Jennifer S. Harper
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have expanded, but real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes remain limited. This study examined real-world outcomes in DLBCL patients treated between 10/1/2015 and 6/30/2024. Patients were stratified by lines of therapy (LOT) and treatments (1L rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP]; 2L stem cell transplant [SCT]; and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR T] therapy (any LOT). Variables were reported descriptively. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. LOT data from 9875 patients were included. R-CHOP-based regimens were the most common 1L treatment (61.7%-67.3% in 2016-2023; 49.4% in 2024). Conventional chemoimmunotherapy use decreased in 2L (81.6% in 2016 to 41.9% in 2024) and 3L (47.6% in 2016 to 22.1% in 2024), while novel therapies increased (43.0% in 2L and 55.9% in 3L in 2024). Median overall survival declined across LOT (1L: 58.1 months; 2L: 30.0 months), as did median time to next treatment (1L: 36.1 months; 2L: 10.6 months). Twelve-month treatment failure rates were 36.0% after 1L, 51.8% after 2L, and 42.2% after CAR T. Among CAR T recipients, 93 received one of 36 distinct subsequent regimens, indicating no standard of care. These findings highlight the unmet needs in DLBCL.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 16(1)
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of Washington (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.