The impact of genetic and environmental risk factors on adverse liver outcomes

To what extent environmental factors are associated with liver diseases and liver cancer among individuals with varying levels of genetic predisposition remains unknown. In 353,703 UK Biobank participants, a validated polygenic risk score (PRS) for liver steatosis (PNPLA3, TM6SF2, MBOAT7, GCKR, and HSD17B13 variants) and an environmental risk score (ERS) from six known risk factors (obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, smoking, frequent alcohol intake, physical inactivity, and infrequent coffee intake) were calculated. Incident outcomes were identified from hospital records and cancer registries. The genetics by environment (G × E) interactions and population attributable risks (PARs) for each ERS tertile were calculated, stratified by PRS tertile. We identified 3801 MASLD, 3458 liver cirrhosis, and 674 liver cancer in a median 13.6-year follow-up. PRS contributes 13.3% (95%CI: 10.8-15.9%) for MASLD, 8.2% (5.5-10.9%) for cirrhosis, and 14.7% (8.6-20.7%) for liver cancer. ERS contributes 34.1% (32.1-36.1%) for MASLD, 25.6% (23.1-28.1%) for cirrhosis, and 25.4% (19.2-31.5%) for liver cancer. Significant G × E interactions (p-interaction <.05) were found for liver cirrhosis and liver cancer where risk attributed to ERS was greater in the high versus the low PRS tertile. For liver cancer, PAR of the high versus low ERS was 36.5% (27.3-45.0%) in the high PRS tertile, compared to 16.5% (4.7-27.9%) in the low PRS tertile. High environmental risk showed greater contributions among participants with high genetic risk for liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. These stronger G × E interactions in clinically severe liver diseases underscore the importance of risk stratification and precision medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70259
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of genetic and environmental risk factors on adverse liver outcomes

Xue Li, Longgang Zhao, Jessica L. Petrick, Katherine A. McGlynn et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The impact of genetic and environmental risk factors on adverse liver outcomes

Xue Li, Longgang Zhao, Jessica L. Petrick, Katherine A. McGlynn, Michelle Lai, Wanshui Yang, Peter T. Campbell, Aiping Fang, Zhenqiu Liu, Xinyuan Zhang, Xuehong Zhang, Yun Chen, Jian‐Gao Fan
article en

Abstract

To what extent environmental factors are associated with liver diseases and liver cancer among individuals with varying levels of genetic predisposition remains unknown. In 353,703 UK Biobank participants, a validated polygenic risk score (PRS) for liver steatosis (PNPLA3, TM6SF2, MBOAT7, GCKR, and HSD17B13 variants) and an environmental risk score (ERS) from six known risk factors (obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, smoking, frequent alcohol intake, physical inactivity, and infrequent coffee intake) were calculated. Incident outcomes were identified from hospital records and cancer registries. The genetics by environment (G × E) interactions and population attributable risks (PARs) for each ERS tertile were calculated, stratified by PRS tertile. We identified 3801 MASLD, 3458 liver cirrhosis, and 674 liver cancer in a median 13.6-year follow-up. PRS contributes 13.3% (95%CI: 10.8-15.9%) for MASLD, 8.2% (5.5-10.9%) for cirrhosis, and 14.7% (8.6-20.7%) for liver cancer. ERS contributes 34.1% (32.1-36.1%) for MASLD, 25.6% (23.1-28.1%) for cirrhosis, and 25.4% (19.2-31.5%) for liver cancer. Significant G × E interactions (p-interaction <.05) were found for liver cirrhosis and liver cancer where risk attributed to ERS was greater in the high versus the low PRS tertile. For liver cancer, PAR of the high versus low ERS was 36.5% (27.3-45.0%) in the high PRS tertile, compared to 16.5% (4.7-27.9%) in the low PRS tertile. High environmental risk showed greater contributions among participants with high genetic risk for liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. These stronger G × E interactions in clinically severe liver diseases underscore the importance of risk stratification and precision medicine.

International Journal of CancerVol. 158(9)
Boston University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), Fudan University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.