QHRD107 (CDK9 Inhibitor), venetoclax, and azacitidine combination therapy (107VA regimen) in relapsed/refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Data updates and subgroup analysis
Abstract Background: QHRD107, a potent CDK9 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising activity in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). The 107VA regimen, a triple combination of QHRD107, venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (AZA), has showed favorable safety profile. With enrollment now completed, we report updated efficacy and long-term survival data. Methods: This phase 2a, open-label, multicenter study (NCT06532058) consisted of a dose escalation phase and expansion phase. Patients with R/R AML were enrolled and received QHRD107 at one of three dose levels (40 mg, 60 mg, or 80 mg, PO, Q12 hours, days 1-28 in combination with AZA (75 mg/m2, days 1-7) and VEN (400 mg with dose ramp-up, days 1-28). The primary objective of the dose escalation phase was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), while the expansion phase focused on assessing composite complete remission rate (cCR) and duration of response (DOR). Results: Between August 2023 and February 2025, a total of 61 patients underwent screening, with 53 included in the intention-to-treat population. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during the dose escalation phase, establishing 80mg of QHRD107 twice daily as the MTD. Due to gastrointestinal toxicity, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive QHRD107 at 60mg or 80mg during the expansion phase. The median age of the cohort was 60 years (range: 19-80), with 24 (45.3%) patients being male. Cytogenetic information was available in 49 (92.5%) patients, and next-generation sequencing results were available in all patients. At baseline, 7 (13.2%) patients had a RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene, 8 (15.1%) had an NPM1 mutation, 10 (18.9%) had a CEBPA bZIP mutation, 5 (9.4%) had a FLT3-ITD mutation and 6 (11.3%) had a TP53 mutation. Seven patients (13.2%) were classified as AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations/cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MR) according to 2022 ELN recommendation. A total of 39 (73.6%) patients had been previously exposed to BCL-2 inhibitors (venetoclax or sonrotoclax), with 35 (66.0%) being refractory or relapsed from VEN-AZA regimen. Three patients in the expansion phase terminated treatment before cycle 1 day 28. Response rates were similar between the 60 and 80mg groups, with no obvious dose-dependent trend. Among 50 efficacy-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 54.0% (CR: 4, CRh: 7, CRi: 9, MLFS: 4, PR: 3), with a cCR rate of 40.0%. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry was achieved in 9 responding patients. Subgroup analysis revealed response differences among patients with different genotypes. Patients with TP53 mutation and AML-MR showed higher response rates, with ORR of 66.7% and 100%, respectively. In contrast, patients with solo NPM1 mutation or NPM1 and FLT3-ITD co-mutations showed lower response rates. Notably, patients who were refractory or relapsed from VEN-AZA treatment achieved high response rates, with cCR rate of 34.3% (12 of 35) and ORR of 54.3% (19 of 35). Among these patients, all 5 AML-MR patients and 4 TP53-mutated patients achieved treatment responses. Three (6%) patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant and 2 patients received autologous stem cell transplant. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months (95% CI: 5.4 to not reached) vs 13.5 months (95% CI: 3.5 to not reached) in the QHRD107 60mg and 80mg groups, respectively. Conclusions: The 107VA regimen demonstrated high response rates in VEN-AZA relapse or refractory AML, particularly in patients with TP53 mutations and myelodysplasia-related features. Based on these data, a phase 2b randomized controlled study comparing 107VA with other salvage regimens is currently being conducted for patients who relapse after VEN-AZA treatment.
Authors
- Fuling Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-0382)
- Zhengping Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5873-3560)
- Ligen Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-783X)
- Lijun Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-4940)
- Zheng Ge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-1612)
- Hengwen Song
- Chunyan Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4438-1768)
- Wei Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-7025)
- Min Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5462-6920)
- Xiang Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-6198)
- Zhichao Shao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-1016)
- Junmin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-1122)
- Bing Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-9504)
- Yunxiang Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3584-5962)
- Shudong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-5525)
- Min Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8468-7772)
- Yanli Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-8006)
- Weiying Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4913-1610)
- Wen Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-4687)
- Junjie Lu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-1351)
- Qi Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-572X)
- Mengdan Sun
- Banghe Ding
- Chunling Wang
- Yan Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4564-4014)
Institutions
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Soochow University (CN)
- PYC Therapeutics (Australia) (AU)
- Huaian First People’s Hospital (CN)
- Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (CN)
- Tongren Hospital (CN)
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
- Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
- Changhong (China) (CN)
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Southeast University (CN)
- China Medical University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5205
- Primary Topic
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00