Real-world outcomes of glofitamab therapy in CAR-T naive patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma

Abstract Background The bispecific antibody (BsAb) glofitamab (G) has demonstrated high efficacy and acceptable feasibility in patients with aggressive relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphoma in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence on its use remains limited, particularly in the context of evolving immunotherapy options and their sequencing. Here we report outcomes of glofitamab in CAR-T naive patients from a compassionate use program (CUP) and routine clinical practice. Materials and methods This multicenter retrospective study included CAR-T naive patients with r/r B-cell lymphoma who were treated with G within CUP or routine clinical practice in 22 Russian centers. Glofitamab was administered according to the approval study. The analysis included evaluation of overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). We assessed the impact of clinical factors on CR achievement and PFS, along with characterization of adverse events (AEs). Results As of July 2025, 152 patients were enrolled. Median age at G initiation was 51 (19-83), male/female ratio - 72/80 (47/53%). The study population included patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, both de novo and transformed (n=88, 58%), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (n=17, 11%), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (n=20, 13%), follicular large B-cell lymphoma (n=9, 6%) and other lymphomas (n=18, 12%). Median number of therapy lines before G was 3 (3-9). Overall, 122 patients (80%) had primary refractory/early relapsed disease, and 56 (37%) presented with Bulky disease (>7.5 cm) at G initiation. Twenty-four patients (16%) underwent auto-HCT, and 2 (1%) allo-HCT previously. The ORR, available for 150 of 152 patients, was 58% (n=87), comprising 45% CR and 13% partial remission (PR). Median follow up was 9.3 months (0.6-51.9). At the last follow-up, 143 (94%) pts discontinued therapy due to: end of treatment after 12 cycles (n=46, 32%), disease progression (n=69, 48%), infections (n=18, 12%, including COVID19 in 15 pts, 10%) or other reason (n=10, 7%). Median PFS was 5.8 months (CI 95%: 3.8-10.7), 1-year PFS 39.4% (CI 95%: 32.1-48.4); median OS was 17.9 months (CI 95%: 12.4-NA), 1-year OS was 59% (CI 95%: 51.2-67.9). Median OS and PFS in patients with CR were not reached; with median follow up 15.6 months (3.2-52), estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 72.8% (CI 95%: 61.3-86.5) and 81.3% (CI 95%: 70.9-93.1) respectively. In contrast, patients with PR demonstrated significantly worse outcomes, with median PFS of 5.5 months (CI 95%: 3.7-NA) and OS of 14.2 months (CI 95%: 8.4-NA). Recent bendamustine administration (≤3 months) prior to G initiation was associated with lower rate of CR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.66, p=0.003) and shorter PFS (3.6 vs 8.8 months, 95% CI 1.13-2.63, HR=1.72, p=0.01). Other risk factors for CR achievement and PFS duration included: ECOG PS >1 (CR: OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83, p=0.016; PFS: HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41–3.22, p=0.004), B symptoms (CR: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.84, p=0.021; PFS: HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.32–3.21, p=0.001), and Bulky disease >7.5 cm (CR: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p=0.010; PFS: HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.26–2.90, p=0.002). Any grade AEs were observed in 132 patients (87%) including grade ≥3 AEs in 57 patients (38%). Grade 5 AEs were reported in 10 patients (7%). Any grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 63 (41%) pts with only 3 patients (2%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. No cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were documented. Infectious AEs occurred in 68 patients (45%), including grade ≥3 AEs in 20 patients (13%; with COVID-19 grade 5 AEs in 10 pts, 7%). Conclusion Glofitamab demonstrates high efficacy in CAR-T naive r/r B-cell lymphoma patients with CR rates comparable to the approval study in a real-world scenario. Notably, ECOG PS, B symptoms, Bulky disease and bendamustine exposure within 3 months prior to G initiation were associated with reduced incidence of CR and worse PFS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-1961
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of glofitamab therapy in CAR-T naive patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma

Lev S. Butaev, Andrey Chekalov, I I Oleĭnik, Anna Zverkova et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Real-world outcomes of glofitamab therapy in CAR-T naive patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma

Lev S. Butaev, Andrey Chekalov, I I Oleĭnik, Anna Zverkova, AliyA r. iSkhAkovA, Anastasiya Kuzyaeva, Ekaterina Zubkova, Diana Ivanova, Svetlana Samarina, E. N. Misyurina, Maria Andrievskih, F. M. Abbasbeyli, E. A. Gitelzon, Е. А. Baryakh, Olga Arzhanukhina, Alexander Kulagin, Н. Г. Габеева, Anna Smolyaninova, Eugene Nikitin, Yu. E. Ryabukhina, Tatyana Tsyganok, Iurii Osipov, В. И. Бахтина, Daria Koroleva, Е. Е. Звонков, Olga Timofeeva, И С Зюзгин, Gulnara N. Khusainova, Valery Lapin, Tatiana Krinitsina, Aleksei Kuvshinov, Natalia Stepanova, Kirill V. Lepik, В. В. Птушкин, Aminat Magomedova, М. В. Ульянова, Olga Samoylova, Vasily Shuvaev, Liudmila Fedorova, Arman Arakelyan, Stanislav Volchenkov, I. Ishmatova, A. Yu. Terekhova, S.A. Vlasova, Anastasia Semenova, Gayane Tumyan, S. Elkhova, Н. А. Фалалеева, Polina Makarovskaya, Olga A. Smirnova, Yana Mangasarova, Vladislav Markelov, Olesya Smykova, P. A. Zeynalovа, Irina Vasileva, Nataliia Mikhailova, Galiya Isaeva, Victoria Basmanova, Leisan Mukharliamova, Iulia Podmankova, Valeria Kimaikina, Svetlana Ovanesian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The bispecific antibody (BsAb) glofitamab (G) has demonstrated high efficacy and acceptable feasibility in patients with aggressive relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphoma in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence on its use remains limited, particularly in the context of evolving immunotherapy options and their sequencing. Here we report outcomes of glofitamab in CAR-T naive patients from a compassionate use program (CUP) and routine clinical practice. Materials and methods This multicenter retrospective study included CAR-T naive patients with r/r B-cell lymphoma who were treated with G within CUP or routine clinical practice in 22 Russian centers. Glofitamab was administered according to the approval study. The analysis included evaluation of overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). We assessed the impact of clinical factors on CR achievement and PFS, along with characterization of adverse events (AEs). Results As of July 2025, 152 patients were enrolled. Median age at G initiation was 51 (19-83), male/female ratio - 72/80 (47/53%). The study population included patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, both de novo and transformed (n=88, 58%), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (n=17, 11%), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (n=20, 13%), follicular large B-cell lymphoma (n=9, 6%) and other lymphomas (n=18, 12%). Median number of therapy lines before G was 3 (3-9). Overall, 122 patients (80%) had primary refractory/early relapsed disease, and 56 (37%) presented with Bulky disease (>7.5 cm) at G initiation. Twenty-four patients (16%) underwent auto-HCT, and 2 (1%) allo-HCT previously. The ORR, available for 150 of 152 patients, was 58% (n=87), comprising 45% CR and 13% partial remission (PR). Median follow up was 9.3 months (0.6-51.9). At the last follow-up, 143 (94%) pts discontinued therapy due to: end of treatment after 12 cycles (n=46, 32%), disease progression (n=69, 48%), infections (n=18, 12%, including COVID19 in 15 pts, 10%) or other reason (n=10, 7%). Median PFS was 5.8 months (CI 95%: 3.8-10.7), 1-year PFS 39.4% (CI 95%: 32.1-48.4); median OS was 17.9 months (CI 95%: 12.4-NA), 1-year OS was 59% (CI 95%: 51.2-67.9). Median OS and PFS in patients with CR were not reached; with median follow up 15.6 months (3.2-52), estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 72.8% (CI 95%: 61.3-86.5) and 81.3% (CI 95%: 70.9-93.1) respectively. In contrast, patients with PR demonstrated significantly worse outcomes, with median PFS of 5.5 months (CI 95%: 3.7-NA) and OS of 14.2 months (CI 95%: 8.4-NA). Recent bendamustine administration (≤3 months) prior to G initiation was associated with lower rate of CR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.66, p=0.003) and shorter PFS (3.6 vs 8.8 months, 95% CI 1.13-2.63, HR=1.72, p=0.01). Other risk factors for CR achievement and PFS duration included: ECOG PS >1 (CR: OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83, p=0.016; PFS: HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41–3.22, p=0.004), B symptoms (CR: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.84, p=0.021; PFS: HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.32–3.21, p=0.001), and Bulky disease >7.5 cm (CR: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p=0.010; PFS: HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.26–2.90, p=0.002). Any grade AEs were observed in 132 patients (87%) including grade ≥3 AEs in 57 patients (38%). Grade 5 AEs were reported in 10 patients (7%). Any grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 63 (41%) pts with only 3 patients (2%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. No cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were documented. Infectious AEs occurred in 68 patients (45%), including grade ≥3 AEs in 20 patients (13%; with COVID-19 grade 5 AEs in 10 pts, 7%). Conclusion Glofitamab demonstrates high efficacy in CAR-T naive r/r B-cell lymphoma patients with CR rates comparable to the approval study in a real-world scenario. Notably, ECOG PS, B symptoms, Bulky disease and bendamustine exposure within 3 months prior to G initiation were associated with reduced incidence of CR and worse PFS.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Sechenov University (RU), Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU), Gorky Institute of World Literature (RU), Moscow Clinical Scientific Center (RU), Moscow City Hospital No 29 (RU), Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after Semashko (RU), Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU), Leningrad Regional Cancer Center (RU), Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital (RU), Clinical Hospital No. 8 (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Kirov Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion FMBA (RU), Institute of Oncology NN Petrov (RU), Medical Radiological Research Center (RU), Saratov State Medical University (RU), Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital (RU), Republican Oncological Clinical Dispensary (RU), Mother Hospital (IN), Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region Regional Clinical Hospital (RU), National Research Center for Hematology Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU), Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology (RU), Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology (RU), Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Center (RU), Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.