Comparative immune profiling reveals T-cell exhaustion in EBV+ monomorphic PTLD vs. immunocompetent DLBCL

Abstract Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurs in up to 30% of high-risk solid organ transplant recipients and is strongly associated with the intensity and duration of immunosuppression. While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive monomorphic PTLD and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) share overlapping morphologic features and expression of canonical B-cell markers, they exhibit distinct EBV transcriptional programs. Immunosuppressive regimens, essential for preventing graft rejection, impair EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, thereby promoting EBV-driven lymphomagenesis. We hypothesized that these differences in viral transcription and immune evasion reflect fundamentally distinct immune microenvironments and host responses in EBV-positive PTLD compared to DLBCL. Methods This prospective, non-interventional study has been conducted at Moffitt Cancer Center since 2019. To characterize tumor-specific T-cell responses in EBV-positive PTLD versus DLBCL, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from enrolled patients were infected with EBV (ATCC VR-1492) to generate autologous, immortalized lymphoblastoid B-cell lines (LCLs). EBV antigen-specific immune responses were quantified using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay targeting EBNA1, LAMP1, LAMP2A, BARF1, and a CEF peptide pool as a control. To optimize cell viability and functional readout post-thaw, we implemented an overnight resting protocol for PBMCs, which demonstrated superior IFN-γ release compared to the conventional 1-hour rest. Results We present pilot data from 11 consecutive patients (55% male; median age 63.4 years), including 3 with PTLD (2 EBV-positive; 2 monomorphic) and 8 with EBV-negative DLBCL. A total of 12 evaluable PBMC samples were analyzed: 7 pre-treatment, 1 mid-treatment, and 4 post-treatment. Successful generation of autologous LCLs was predominantly achieved using pre-treatment samples, whereas samples collected after B-cell–targeted therapy (Rituximab ± CHOP) showed reduced transformation efficiency. Notably, early pre-treatment samples exhibited a relative enrichment of CD27⁺ memory B cells. Baseline flow cytometric profiling of B cells undergoing LCL transformation revealed low CD19 expression (range <1%–15%). Repeat immunophenotyping at 3 weeks identified residual T cells within cultures, suggesting ongoing B-cell clearance. In matched flow cytometry and ELISpot assays from 7 evaluable patients with pre-treatment samples, EBV-positive PTLD cases demonstrated pronounced overexpression of PD-1 and TIM-3, but not LAG-3, alongside markedly diminished T-cell responses to EBV antigens. This distinct immunophenotypic and functional signature suggests T-cell exhaustion or dysfunction, likely driven by prior immunosuppression, which may impair immune surveillance and facilitate EBV-driven lymphomagenesis. Conclusions Our findings reveal distinct immunologic profiles in EBV-positive monomorphic PTLD compared to EBV-negative DLBCL, characterized by immune exhaustion and impaired T-cell functionality. Specifically, overexpression of PD-1 and TIM-3—but not LAG-3—in EBV-positive PTLD correlated with diminished antigen-specific T-cell responses, as measured by ELISpot, underscoring the role of prior immunosuppression in shaping ineffective tumor-specific immunity. Successful generation of autologous LCLs was predominantly achieved from pre-treatment PBMCs, highlighting the impact of B-cell–depleting therapies (Rituximab ± CHOP) on downstream immune profiling feasibility. The persistence of residual T cells in long-term LCL cultures suggests ongoing B-cell clearance and may reflect previously unrecognized immune dynamics in PTLD. Collectively, these data provide novel insights into the immune landscape of EBV-driven PTLD and support the rationale for therapeutic strategies aimed at reversing T-cell exhaustion—such as immune checkpoint blockade or adoptive T-cell therapies—to restore anti-EBV immunity in transplant recipients.