Integrated machine learning analysis for automatic recognition of b-ALL MRD level in flow cytometry list mode data

Abstract Introduction Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by flow cytometry is a powerful prognostic indicator in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but accurately differentiating normal precursor B cells from leukemic cells requires significant training and experience. This study presents an integrated machine learning pipeline that combines cell- and sample-level assessments to automatically classify B-ALL MRD samples. Materials and Methods List mode data from 772 bone marrow samples analyzed for residual B-ALL using a two-tube 6-color panel were collected from Johns Hopkins Hospital cases under an IRB approved protocol; 386 were classified as MRD positive and 386 negative by an expert (MJB). Manual cell-type annotations from a subset of cases were used to train a hierarchical cell-level classification model, which served as a preprocessing step to exclude non-lymphocytes and mature B cells from the full dataset. This facilitated the training of a sample-level classification model. The integrated model development comprises three main stages: First, data Curation and quality check: Raw flow cytometry data files (.fcs or .lmd), clinical interpretations (MRD-negative, MRD-positive <0.1%, 0.1–1%, and >1%), and expert cell-gating results were collected and reviewed to ensure eligibility for analysis. Second, model training: Approved datasets and annotations were used to train and validate machine learning models. The sample-level model utilized previously established frameworks [1,2], such as GMM-SVM, for classifying MRD status. The hierarchical cell-level model employed algorithms like XGBoost for binary classifications: first distinguishing lymphocytes from non-lymphocytes, then separating immature B cells within the lymphocyte population. The trained cell model was then applied to filter irrelevant cell populations prior to sample-level classification. Third, expert review and validation: Model predictions were reviewed by experts using custom visualization and annotation tools, facilitating an efficient feedback cycle for model improvement. Results The cell-level classification models demonstrated strong performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 99.96% and an accuracy of 99.19% for distinguishing lymphocytes from non-lymphocytes, and an AUC of 99.94% with an accuracy of 99.43% for differentiating immature B cells from mature lymphocytes. At the sample level, we evaluated MRD classification performance using different cell-filtering strategies. With initial cell filtering, the AUC increased from 76.5% to 82.45%, and accuracy improved from 68.79% to 74.74%. Further enhancement was achieved by removing the downsampling step from the previous framework and excluding mature lymphocytes based on cell-type classification, resulting in an AUC of 91.13% and an accuracy of 83.16%. The best performance was observed with the addition of a channel-wise transformation step and excluding mature lymphocytes for data preprocessing, reaching an AUC of 94.06% and an accuracy of 86.40%. Discussion These results demonstrate how integrated machine learning methods could deliver consistent automated analysis of B-ALL MRD. We next created an interactive review tool for evaluation of discordant cases that will enable iterative model performance improvements, particularly in challenging scenarios with low-level MRD or atypical immunophenotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5143
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated machine learning analysis for automatic recognition of b-ALL MRD level in flow cytometry list mode data

Jen-Wei Wang, Yu‐Fen Wang, Fong-Ci Lin, En-Ping Chu et al.
Blood
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Integrated machine learning analysis for automatic recognition of b-ALL MRD level in flow cytometry list mode data

Jen-Wei Wang, Yu‐Fen Wang, Fong-Ci Lin, En-Ping Chu, J. David Peske, Bor‐Sheng Ko, Michael J. Borowitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by flow cytometry is a powerful prognostic indicator in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but accurately differentiating normal precursor B cells from leukemic cells requires significant training and experience. This study presents an integrated machine learning pipeline that combines cell- and sample-level assessments to automatically classify B-ALL MRD samples. Materials and Methods List mode data from 772 bone marrow samples analyzed for residual B-ALL using a two-tube 6-color panel were collected from Johns Hopkins Hospital cases under an IRB approved protocol; 386 were classified as MRD positive and 386 negative by an expert (MJB). Manual cell-type annotations from a subset of cases were used to train a hierarchical cell-level classification model, which served as a preprocessing step to exclude non-lymphocytes and mature B cells from the full dataset. This facilitated the training of a sample-level classification model. The integrated model development comprises three main stages: First, data Curation and quality check: Raw flow cytometry data files (.fcs or .lmd), clinical interpretations (MRD-negative, MRD-positive <0.1%, 0.1–1%, and >1%), and expert cell-gating results were collected and reviewed to ensure eligibility for analysis. Second, model training: Approved datasets and annotations were used to train and validate machine learning models. The sample-level model utilized previously established frameworks [1,2], such as GMM-SVM, for classifying MRD status. The hierarchical cell-level model employed algorithms like XGBoost for binary classifications: first distinguishing lymphocytes from non-lymphocytes, then separating immature B cells within the lymphocyte population. The trained cell model was then applied to filter irrelevant cell populations prior to sample-level classification. Third, expert review and validation: Model predictions were reviewed by experts using custom visualization and annotation tools, facilitating an efficient feedback cycle for model improvement. Results The cell-level classification models demonstrated strong performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 99.96% and an accuracy of 99.19% for distinguishing lymphocytes from non-lymphocytes, and an AUC of 99.94% with an accuracy of 99.43% for differentiating immature B cells from mature lymphocytes. At the sample level, we evaluated MRD classification performance using different cell-filtering strategies. With initial cell filtering, the AUC increased from 76.5% to 82.45%, and accuracy improved from 68.79% to 74.74%. Further enhancement was achieved by removing the downsampling step from the previous framework and excluding mature lymphocytes based on cell-type classification, resulting in an AUC of 91.13% and an accuracy of 83.16%. The best performance was observed with the addition of a channel-wise transformation step and excluding mature lymphocytes for data preprocessing, reaching an AUC of 94.06% and an accuracy of 86.40%. Discussion These results demonstrate how integrated machine learning methods could deliver consistent automated analysis of B-ALL MRD. We next created an interactive review tool for evaluation of discordant cases that will enable iterative model performance improvements, particularly in challenging scenarios with low-level MRD or atypical immunophenotypes.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), National Taiwan University (TW), Yuanpei University (TW), TaiGen Biotechnology (Taiwan) (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), American Association for Higher Education and Accreditation (US), University of Baltimore (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.