One-year outcomes of daratumumab-based vs. non-daratumumab regimens in AL amyloidosis: A propensity-matched real-world study

Abstract Background: Daratumumab is increasingly used in the treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis, yet real-world comparative data on its safety and effectiveness remain limited. This study evaluates one-year clinical outcomes between patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab-based regimens versus those who did not receive daratumumab. Methods: Using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified adults diagnosed with AL amyloidosis (ICD-10: E85.81) between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients with stage 3 disease or prior amyloidosis were excluded. Cohort 1 included 738 patients who received daratumumab within 3 months of diagnosis; Cohort 2 included 3,928 patients who did not receive daratumumab. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 692 patients remained in each group. Outcomes assessed over 12 months post-treatment initiation included mortality, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, chronic kidney disease (CKD), infections, hematologic adverse events, and neurologic complications. Results: Mortality at one year was significantly higher in the daratumumab group (21.0% vs. 12.5%; risk ratio [RR] 1.68, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival was also lower in the daratumumab group (78.4% vs. 86.6%, p<0.001). Daratumumab-treated patients had higher rates of heart failure (30.4% vs. 12.4%; RR 2.46), cardiomyopathy (32.0% vs. 12.1%; RR 2.64), and cardiac arrest or shock (6.7% vs. 2.4%; RR 2.75), all p<0.001. CKD was more frequent in the daratumumab cohort (30.5% vs. 16.6%, RR 1.83, p<0.001), as were infections (18.5% vs. 8.6%, RR 2.14, p<0.001) and hematologic adverse events (30.9% vs. 18.3%, RR 1.69, p<0.001). Neurologic events were also elevated (4.8% vs. 2.4%; RR 1.97, p=0.026). The daratumumab group also had significantly higher rates of stem cell transplants (9.4% vs. 5.3%; RR 1.77, p=0.005) Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, daratumumab-treated AL amyloidosis patients exhibited significantly higher rates of one-year mortality and major adverse events, including cardiac, renal, infectious, and hematologic complications, compared to matched patients receiving non-daratumumab therapy. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and close monitoring when initiating daratumumab in AL amyloidosis and emphasizes the importance of additional prospective safety studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6369
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-year outcomes of daratumumab-based vs. non-daratumumab regimens in AL amyloidosis: A propensity-matched real-world study

Angimar Uriepero, Tarfa Verinumbe, Alankrita Taneja, Muluken Megiso et al.
Blood
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

One-year outcomes of daratumumab-based vs. non-daratumumab regimens in AL amyloidosis: A propensity-matched real-world study

Angimar Uriepero, Tarfa Verinumbe, Alankrita Taneja, Muluken Megiso, Elvis Obomanu, Kelechi Onyenemezu, Nnamdi J Omenuko, Nneoma Ubah, Chidiebube Ugwu, Chidiebere Ezeh, Gàbor Varadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Daratumumab is increasingly used in the treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis, yet real-world comparative data on its safety and effectiveness remain limited. This study evaluates one-year clinical outcomes between patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab-based regimens versus those who did not receive daratumumab. Methods: Using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified adults diagnosed with AL amyloidosis (ICD-10: E85.81) between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients with stage 3 disease or prior amyloidosis were excluded. Cohort 1 included 738 patients who received daratumumab within 3 months of diagnosis; Cohort 2 included 3,928 patients who did not receive daratumumab. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 692 patients remained in each group. Outcomes assessed over 12 months post-treatment initiation included mortality, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, chronic kidney disease (CKD), infections, hematologic adverse events, and neurologic complications. Results: Mortality at one year was significantly higher in the daratumumab group (21.0% vs. 12.5%; risk ratio [RR] 1.68, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival was also lower in the daratumumab group (78.4% vs. 86.6%, p<0.001). Daratumumab-treated patients had higher rates of heart failure (30.4% vs. 12.4%; RR 2.46), cardiomyopathy (32.0% vs. 12.1%; RR 2.64), and cardiac arrest or shock (6.7% vs. 2.4%; RR 2.75), all p<0.001. CKD was more frequent in the daratumumab cohort (30.5% vs. 16.6%, RR 1.83, p<0.001), as were infections (18.5% vs. 8.6%, RR 2.14, p<0.001) and hematologic adverse events (30.9% vs. 18.3%, RR 1.69, p<0.001). Neurologic events were also elevated (4.8% vs. 2.4%; RR 1.97, p=0.026). The daratumumab group also had significantly higher rates of stem cell transplants (9.4% vs. 5.3%; RR 1.77, p=0.005) Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, daratumumab-treated AL amyloidosis patients exhibited significantly higher rates of one-year mortality and major adverse events, including cardiac, renal, infectious, and hematologic complications, compared to matched patients receiving non-daratumumab therapy. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and close monitoring when initiating daratumumab in AL amyloidosis and emphasizes the importance of additional prospective safety studies.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of Nigeria (NG), East Tennessee State University (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US), Nazareth Hospital (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Nazareth Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.