Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the perceived stress scale-10 among pregnant women

Stress during pregnancy can significantly impact maternal and fetal health. Accurately assessing perceived stress is crucial for early intervention and improved health outcomes. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a widely used tool for measuring perceived stress. However, the Chinese version (CPSS-10) has not yet been validated among pregnant women in mainland China. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSS-10 in this population. The study was conducted in a Chinese hospital between February and August 2024, using a convenience sample of pregnant women. The CPSS-10 was evaluated using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses. EFA employed principal component analysis and varimax rotation, identifying factors with eigenvalues > 1 and factor loadings > 0.50. CFA assessed model fit using χ2/df, Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Convergent and discriminant validity were examined, and concurrent validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. The analyses were conducted using Amos 23.0 and IBM SPSS Statistics 29. A total of 428 pregnant Chinese women participated in the study. EFA revealed two factors, which together accounted for 59.869% of the variance. Item loadings ranged from 0.658 to 0.833. CFA results confirmed an acceptable fit for the two-factor model, with χ2/df = 3.789 (less than 5), p < 0.001, IFI = 0.892, TLI = 0.855, CFI = 0.890, and RMSEA = 0.116. Convergent validity was supported by average variance extracted (0.434–0.558) and composite reliability (0.754–0.883). Discriminant validity was established, and internal consistency was acceptable, with values ranging from 0.749 to 0.881. A significant negative correlation with perceived social support also supported concurrent validity. 52.4% of women reported moderate to high perceived stress levels (score ≥ 14). The CPSS-10 demonstrates strong psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing perceived stress among pregnant women in mainland China. Its use may aid in identifying stress-related risk during pregnancy and guide timely psychological support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03730-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the perceived stress scale-10 among pregnant women

Chaojie Liu, Jiasi Yao, Zhifen Yang, Chunning Chen et al.
1 citations
BMC Psychology
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
1.88
article

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the perceived stress scale-10 among pregnant women

Chaojie Liu, Jiasi Yao, Zhifen Yang, Chunning Chen, Yan Liang, Yu Zang, Zaleha Md Isa, Jingya Zhang, Siti Zuhaida Hussein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Stress during pregnancy can significantly impact maternal and fetal health. Accurately assessing perceived stress is crucial for early intervention and improved health outcomes. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a widely used tool for measuring perceived stress. However, the Chinese version (CPSS-10) has not yet been validated among pregnant women in mainland China. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSS-10 in this population. The study was conducted in a Chinese hospital between February and August 2024, using a convenience sample of pregnant women. The CPSS-10 was evaluated using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses. EFA employed principal component analysis and varimax rotation, identifying factors with eigenvalues > 1 and factor loadings > 0.50. CFA assessed model fit using χ2/df, Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Convergent and discriminant validity were examined, and concurrent validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. The analyses were conducted using Amos 23.0 and IBM SPSS Statistics 29. A total of 428 pregnant Chinese women participated in the study. EFA revealed two factors, which together accounted for 59.869% of the variance. Item loadings ranged from 0.658 to 0.833. CFA results confirmed an acceptable fit for the two-factor model, with χ2/df = 3.789 (less than 5), p < 0.001, IFI = 0.892, TLI = 0.855, CFI = 0.890, and RMSEA = 0.116. Convergent validity was supported by average variance extracted (0.434–0.558) and composite reliability (0.754–0.883). Discriminant validity was established, and internal consistency was acceptable, with values ranging from 0.749 to 0.881. A significant negative correlation with perceived social support also supported concurrent validity. 52.4% of women reported moderate to high perceived stress levels (score ≥ 14). The CPSS-10 demonstrates strong psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing perceived stress among pregnant women in mainland China. Its use may aid in identifying stress-related risk during pregnancy and guide timely psychological support.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.