Phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy:  preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data from the “STEM” (Sequential T Cell-Engagement for Myeloma) trial

Abstract Background: BCMA-targeted CAR T cells have unprecedented activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but the majority of patients (pts) relapse. Mechanisms of resistance include lack of persistence or poor function of CAR T cells, as well as BCMA-low or -negative residual tumor cells. FcRH5 is a MM antigen with expression independent of BCMA. Cevostamab (cevo) is an FcRH5-targeted, T cell-engaging bispecific antibody with demonstrated activity in RRMM, including in patients with prior BCMA-directed therapies (Richter et al, ASH 2024, #1021). We hypothesized that fixed-duration cevo following BCMA-targeted CAR T cells would be feasible, tolerable and improve sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) rates, potentially leading to more durable responses. Methods: This is an ongoing single-institution, investigator-initiated study (NCT05801939), with funding from Genentech/Roche. RRMM pts who received standard of care CAR T cells (ide-cel or cilta-cel) 8-10 weeks prior to enrollment, with stable disease or better, receive cevo at a step-up dose of 3.6 mg intravenously (IV) on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), followed by full target dose starting on C1D8, then every 3 weeks for total of 8 cycles. If pts are in MRD-negative CR after 8 cycles (Adaptive Clonoseq assay, at 10-5 sensitivity), they stop therapy and are observed. If not, they get another 8 cycles of cevo, and then are observed. Primary endpoint is frequency of MRD-negative CR at 12 months post-CAR T cell therapy. All pts receive IVIG. Results: Twenty-seven pts (20M and 7F; median age 64 (33-80); 21 White, 6 Black) have enrolled. Twenty (74%) had high risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), -17p, -1p, or +1q), with 11 (41%) having ≥2 high risk features; 5 (19%) had extramedullary disease. Median number of prior lines was 4 (2-10), with 74% triple-class refractory, 11% prior BCMA therapy, and 11% prior talquetamab. Twenty-five (93%) received cilta-cel and 2 (7%) ide-cel. Reponses at enrollment (post-CAR T cells) were 63% CR/sCR, 15% VGPR, 18% PR, 4% SD; 25 of 27 pts were evaluable for MRD, with 100% MRD-negative at 10-5. During a safety run-in, 3 pts started cevo 8-10 weeks post-CAR T cells, at a target dose of 160 mg, and during C1 all had grade (G) 1 or 2 allergic-type symptoms (rash, arthralgias, cough and/or bronchospasm) which resolved with anti-histamines and topical or systemic steroids. For this reason, the study was modified to start cevo 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cells and change target dose to 132 mg. As of 6/27/25 data cut-off, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) have occurred. CRS occurred in 4 (15%) pts (3 G1, 1 G2) and infusion reactions in 19% (all G1/2); no ICANS or HLH was seen. Median number of cycles is 8, and 6 (22%) pts have had dose reductions from 132 to 90mg. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE's), regardless of attribution, include lymphopenia (74%, G3/4 67%), neutropenia (74%, G3/4 44%), cough (59%, G3/4 0%), rash 44% (G3/4 0%), thrombocytopenia 41% (G3/4 22%), upper respiratory infection 37% (G3/4 0%), nasal congestion 33% (G3/4 0%), and AST increase 33% (G3/4 7%). Infections were seen in 52% (G3/4 in 15%). Notable immune-related AE's include colitis G1, neuropathy with ataxia G3, ITP G4 (n=2, 1 with prior history), autoimmune hepatitis G1) – all resolved. So far, 22 pts are response-evaluable after 8 cycles, with 81% in stringent CR, 9% in VGPR, 5% in SD; 21/22 (95%) were MRD-negative at 10-5, and 20/22 (91%) at 10-6 (1 pt had PD after C4, counted as MRD+). Only 3 pts to date have required the 2nd 8 cycles of cevo. Fourteen pts are evaluable at 1 year post-CAR T cells, with 93% in MRD-negative (at 10-5) sCR, 79% at 10-6. With median follow-up of 12 months (range 3-25) post-CAR T cells, estimated 12-month PFS and OS are both 95%. Preliminary correlative analyses demonstrate detectable CAR+ T cells (by both qPCR and flow) at enrollment in 2 of 5 pts tested to date; both had modest re-expansion of CAR T cells during C1 of cevo, with persistence out to 1 year.Conclusions: To date, cevostamab consolidation starting 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cell infusion at 3.6mg single step-up and 132mg q3wk target dose appears feasible and well-tolerated in heavily-pretreated RRMM, with low rates of non-hematologic G3/4 TEAE's, including infections. Preliminary efficacy appears promising, with over 90% showing sustained MRD-negative CR at 1 year. Analyses and follow-up are ongoing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-699
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy:  preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data from the “STEM” (Sequential T Cell-Engagement for Myeloma) trial

Matthew Ho, Sandra P. Susanibar-Adaniya, Wei‐Ting Hwang, Julia Han Noll et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy:  preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data from the “STEM” (Sequential T Cell-Engagement for Myeloma) trial

Matthew Ho, Sandra P. Susanibar-Adaniya, Wei‐Ting Hwang, Julia Han Noll, Adam Justin Waxman, Edward Allen Stadtmauer, Vanessa Gonzalez, Alfred L. Garfall, Joseph A. Fraietta, Dan T. Vogl, Luca Paruzzo, Shivani Kapur, Cynthia Diaczynsky, Bin Yi, Marco Ruella, Danielle Zubka, Rong Xu, Adam Cohen, Peter Michener, Elina Thai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: BCMA-targeted CAR T cells have unprecedented activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but the majority of patients (pts) relapse. Mechanisms of resistance include lack of persistence or poor function of CAR T cells, as well as BCMA-low or -negative residual tumor cells. FcRH5 is a MM antigen with expression independent of BCMA. Cevostamab (cevo) is an FcRH5-targeted, T cell-engaging bispecific antibody with demonstrated activity in RRMM, including in patients with prior BCMA-directed therapies (Richter et al, ASH 2024, #1021). We hypothesized that fixed-duration cevo following BCMA-targeted CAR T cells would be feasible, tolerable and improve sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) rates, potentially leading to more durable responses. Methods: This is an ongoing single-institution, investigator-initiated study (NCT05801939), with funding from Genentech/Roche. RRMM pts who received standard of care CAR T cells (ide-cel or cilta-cel) 8-10 weeks prior to enrollment, with stable disease or better, receive cevo at a step-up dose of 3.6 mg intravenously (IV) on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), followed by full target dose starting on C1D8, then every 3 weeks for total of 8 cycles. If pts are in MRD-negative CR after 8 cycles (Adaptive Clonoseq assay, at 10-5 sensitivity), they stop therapy and are observed. If not, they get another 8 cycles of cevo, and then are observed. Primary endpoint is frequency of MRD-negative CR at 12 months post-CAR T cell therapy. All pts receive IVIG. Results: Twenty-seven pts (20M and 7F; median age 64 (33-80); 21 White, 6 Black) have enrolled. Twenty (74%) had high risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), -17p, -1p, or +1q), with 11 (41%) having ≥2 high risk features; 5 (19%) had extramedullary disease. Median number of prior lines was 4 (2-10), with 74% triple-class refractory, 11% prior BCMA therapy, and 11% prior talquetamab. Twenty-five (93%) received cilta-cel and 2 (7%) ide-cel. Reponses at enrollment (post-CAR T cells) were 63% CR/sCR, 15% VGPR, 18% PR, 4% SD; 25 of 27 pts were evaluable for MRD, with 100% MRD-negative at 10-5. During a safety run-in, 3 pts started cevo 8-10 weeks post-CAR T cells, at a target dose of 160 mg, and during C1 all had grade (G) 1 or 2 allergic-type symptoms (rash, arthralgias, cough and/or bronchospasm) which resolved with anti-histamines and topical or systemic steroids. For this reason, the study was modified to start cevo 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cells and change target dose to 132 mg. As of 6/27/25 data cut-off, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) have occurred. CRS occurred in 4 (15%) pts (3 G1, 1 G2) and infusion reactions in 19% (all G1/2); no ICANS or HLH was seen. Median number of cycles is 8, and 6 (22%) pts have had dose reductions from 132 to 90mg. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE's), regardless of attribution, include lymphopenia (74%, G3/4 67%), neutropenia (74%, G3/4 44%), cough (59%, G3/4 0%), rash 44% (G3/4 0%), thrombocytopenia 41% (G3/4 22%), upper respiratory infection 37% (G3/4 0%), nasal congestion 33% (G3/4 0%), and AST increase 33% (G3/4 7%). Infections were seen in 52% (G3/4 in 15%). Notable immune-related AE's include colitis G1, neuropathy with ataxia G3, ITP G4 (n=2, 1 with prior history), autoimmune hepatitis G1) – all resolved. So far, 22 pts are response-evaluable after 8 cycles, with 81% in stringent CR, 9% in VGPR, 5% in SD; 21/22 (95%) were MRD-negative at 10-5, and 20/22 (91%) at 10-6 (1 pt had PD after C4, counted as MRD+). Only 3 pts to date have required the 2nd 8 cycles of cevo. Fourteen pts are evaluable at 1 year post-CAR T cells, with 93% in MRD-negative (at 10-5) sCR, 79% at 10-6. With median follow-up of 12 months (range 3-25) post-CAR T cells, estimated 12-month PFS and OS are both 95%. Preliminary correlative analyses demonstrate detectable CAR+ T cells (by both qPCR and flow) at enrollment in 2 of 5 pts tested to date; both had modest re-expansion of CAR T cells during C1 of cevo, with persistence out to 1 year.Conclusions: To date, cevostamab consolidation starting 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cell infusion at 3.6mg single step-up and 132mg q3wk target dose appears feasible and well-tolerated in heavily-pretreated RRMM, with low rates of non-hematologic G3/4 TEAE's, including infections. Preliminary efficacy appears promising, with over 90% showing sustained MRD-negative CR at 1 year. Analyses and follow-up are ongoing.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.