Development and initial validation of an academic entitlement scale in Egyptian college students

Academic entitlement represents students' expectations of academic success without personal responsibility. Despite growing research on academic entitlement in Western contexts, validated measurement tools for non-Western educational settings remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an academic entitlement Scale specifically designed for use within Egyptian higher education. A quantitative methodology was employed with 1,327 undergraduate students from Al-Azhar University's Faculty of Education. The study utilized a 43-item Academic Entitlement Scale, which underwent expert review and translation. Data analysis included exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with 728 students (370 males, 358 females), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 599 students (161 males, 438 females), reliability assessment through multiple methods (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, test–retest reliability), and validity examination through correlational analyses. EFA revealed a five-factor structure accounting for 42.8% of total variance, initially resulting in a 34-item scale. Following CFA model refinement, a final 28-item scale emerged. The factors identified were: Reward for Minimal Effort, Control Over Learning Environment, Consumer Mindset, Entitled Expectations, and Externalized Responsibility. CFA confirmed this structure with satisfactory fit indices (CFI = 0.918, RMSEA = 0.045, CMIN/DF = 2.207). The scale demonstrated good convergent validity (AVE = 0.574) and composite reliability (CR = 0.869). Inter-factor correlations ranged from 0.366 to 0.551, supporting discriminant validity while confirming their collective representation of the broader academic entitlement construct. Reliability coefficients were robust across multiple metrics (ω = 0.714–0.842; α = 0.710–0.841), with the total scale showing excellent reliability (ω = 0.902). Test–retest reliability over 17 days demonstrated acceptable to good temporal stability (r = 0.561–0.870). The Academic Entitlement Scale demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties within Egyptian higher education, capturing the multidimensional nature of academic entitlement in this cultural context. The emergence of Control Over Learning Environment and Consumer Mindset as distinct factors suggests unique cultural considerations in Egyptian students' academic expectations. This validated scale provides a valuable tool for researchers and educators to assess and address entitlement behaviors in Arab university settings, contributing to a more globally inclusive understanding of academic entitlement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03740-7
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and initial validation of an academic entitlement scale in Egyptian college students

Mohamed Ali Nemt-allah, Ashraf Ragab Ibrahim
BMC Psychology
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Development and initial validation of an academic entitlement scale in Egyptian college students

Mohamed Ali Nemt-allah, Ashraf Ragab Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

Academic entitlement represents students' expectations of academic success without personal responsibility. Despite growing research on academic entitlement in Western contexts, validated measurement tools for non-Western educational settings remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an academic entitlement Scale specifically designed for use within Egyptian higher education. A quantitative methodology was employed with 1,327 undergraduate students from Al-Azhar University's Faculty of Education. The study utilized a 43-item Academic Entitlement Scale, which underwent expert review and translation. Data analysis included exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with 728 students (370 males, 358 females), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 599 students (161 males, 438 females), reliability assessment through multiple methods (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, test–retest reliability), and validity examination through correlational analyses. EFA revealed a five-factor structure accounting for 42.8% of total variance, initially resulting in a 34-item scale. Following CFA model refinement, a final 28-item scale emerged. The factors identified were: Reward for Minimal Effort, Control Over Learning Environment, Consumer Mindset, Entitled Expectations, and Externalized Responsibility. CFA confirmed this structure with satisfactory fit indices (CFI = 0.918, RMSEA = 0.045, CMIN/DF = 2.207). The scale demonstrated good convergent validity (AVE = 0.574) and composite reliability (CR = 0.869). Inter-factor correlations ranged from 0.366 to 0.551, supporting discriminant validity while confirming their collective representation of the broader academic entitlement construct. Reliability coefficients were robust across multiple metrics (ω = 0.714–0.842; α = 0.710–0.841), with the total scale showing excellent reliability (ω = 0.902). Test–retest reliability over 17 days demonstrated acceptable to good temporal stability (r = 0.561–0.870). The Academic Entitlement Scale demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties within Egyptian higher education, capturing the multidimensional nature of academic entitlement in this cultural context. The emergence of Control Over Learning Environment and Consumer Mindset as distinct factors suggests unique cultural considerations in Egyptian students' academic expectations. This validated scale provides a valuable tool for researchers and educators to assess and address entitlement behaviors in Arab university settings, contributing to a more globally inclusive understanding of academic entitlement.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.