A Positive Theory of Information for Debt Contracting: Implications for Financial Reporting

ABSTRACT Debt contracting creates demand for information from lenders to facilitate three distinct but related decisions: Lenders gather information prior to contract initiation for screening borrowers; later, once the contract is in force, lenders use information to assess changes in borrower default risk to determine the suitability of the initial contract terms; and finally, lenders collect information to ensure borrower compliance with information‐contingent contract terms. I examine what features of information are useful for these decisions, including whether the information is hard or soft ; whether it is predictive or reflective ; and whether the information includes just recurring components or whether it also admits non‐recurring information. Extensions of the base model are discussed to accommodate different institutional features of debt markets. I continue by considering how publicly reported financial information is potentially useful to lenders, and conclude by discussing avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70038
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Positive Theory of Information for Debt Contracting: Implications for Financial Reporting

Peter R. Demerjian
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

A Positive Theory of Information for Debt Contracting: Implications for Financial Reporting

Peter R. Demerjian
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Debt contracting creates demand for information from lenders to facilitate three distinct but related decisions: Lenders gather information prior to contract initiation for screening borrowers; later, once the contract is in force, lenders use information to assess changes in borrower default risk to determine the suitability of the initial contract terms; and finally, lenders collect information to ensure borrower compliance with information‐contingent contract terms. I examine what features of information are useful for these decisions, including whether the information is hard or soft ; whether it is predictive or reflective ; and whether the information includes just recurring components or whether it also admits non‐recurring information. Extensions of the base model are discussed to accommodate different institutional features of debt markets. I continue by considering how publicly reported financial information is potentially useful to lenders, and conclude by discussing avenues for future research.

Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Positive Theory of Information for Debt Contracting: Implications for Financial Reporting — Peter R. Demerjian · Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS