Long-term follow-up of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, especially those with FLT3-ITD mutations, have poor outcomes with azacitidine and venetoclax (VEN). The combination of azacitidine, VEN, and gilteritinib (GILT) has demonstrated promising results, with CR/CRi rate of 96%, flow measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate of 93%, and median overall survival (OS) not reached (NR) at a median follow-up of 19.3 months. Here we report long-term (>3-year) follow-up from a phase II trial of this triplet regimen in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3-mutated AML. Methods: Adult pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy received azacitidine 75mg/m2 on days 1-7, VEN 400mg on days 1-28, and GILT 80mg on days 1-28. On day 14, a bone marrow was performed and both VEN and GILT were held if bone marrow blasts <5% or if aplastic/insufficient. For cycle 2-24, pts received azacitidine on days 1-5, VEN 400mg on days 1-7, and continuous GILT. Starting in cycle 25, GILT 80mg daily was maintained as monotherapy. Astellas Pharma provided funding and GILT drug support for this study. Results: Between October 2020 and December 2022, 30 pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 18-86 years) with 8 pts (30%) aged ≥75 years. 15 pts (50%) had an ECOG of 2. 22 pts (73%) had FLT3-ITD mutations and 8 (27%) had FLT3-TKD mutations. Mutations in RAS pathway (KRAS, NRAS, PTPN11, CBL1, NF1 and/or BRAF) were detectable in 7 pts (23%). 14 pts (47%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission at a median time of 4.8 months from treatment initiation (11 with FLT3-ITD; 3 with FLT3-TKD). 6 pts (43%) received post-transplant FLT3i maintenance (5 with GILT). Among pts who underwent SCT, 6 (43%) are alive in continuous CR, 5 (36%) died in CR, and 3 (21%) relapsed at 9.1, 9.9, and 20.7 months after SCT. Of the 16 pts (53%) who did not undergo SCT, 5 (31%) remain in continuous CR, 3 (19%) died in CR, and 8 (50%) relapsed after a median remission duration of 21.1 months (range, 2.9-38.4 months). Among 11 pts who had relapsed, 8 had FLT3-ITD and 3 had FLT3-TKD mutations at study enrollment. At relapse, 6 of 9 pts (67%) tested by PCR no longer had detectable FLT3 mutations, and 6 of 8 pts (75%) who underwent cyto-molecular testing showed evidence of clonal evolution. With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 23.4 months, with a 3-year RFS of 43%. The median OS was 29.7 months, and the 3-year OS was 46%. Among pts with FLT3-ITD mutations, median RFS and OS were 17 and 21.8 months, and 3-year RFS and OS were 32% and 36%, respectively. For those with FLT3-TKD mutations, median RFS and OS were 38.5 months and NR, and the 3-year RFS and OS were both 75%. No survival difference was observed by age group. Pts <75 years had a 3-year RFS of 45% and OS of 50%, while those ≥75 years had 38% for both (RFS: p=0.54; OS: p=0.53). Pts with RAS pathway mutations trended toward worse outcomes compared with those without these mutations (3-year RFS: 29% vs. 48%, p=0.1; 3-year OS: 29% vs. 52%, p=0.2). In a landmark analysis, outcomes did not differ significantly based on SCT status. The 3-year RFS was 43% for pts who underwent SCT versus 54% for those who did not (p=0.75); the 3-year OS was 50% versus 54%, respectively (p=0.78). No unexpected adverse events (AEs) were observed with longer follow-up. The most common grade ≥3 nonhematological AEs were infection (19 pts, 63%), febrile neutropenia (12 pts, 40%), and sepsis (5 pts, 17%). The median number of cycles received was 3 (range, 1-36). 10 (33%) and 7 (23%) pts received ≥6 and ≥12 cycles, respectively. 4 pts (13%) completed 24 cycles. Among 25 pts who received ≥2 cycles, 17 (68%) required dose reductions of at least one drug, including VEN in 12 pts (48%), azacitidine in 11 pts (44%), and GILT in 7 pts (28%). Among pts who received at least 6 cycles of therapy, the median duration of azacitidine, VEN, and GILT were 5 (range, 3-5), 7 (range, 3-7), and 28 days (range, 7-28), respectively. Conclusion: Continued follow-up of pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML treated with azacitidine, VEN and GILT demonstrates durable responses and encouraging survival. Outcomes appear superior to standard azacitidine and venetoclax, and randomized studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-45
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term follow-up of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Farhad Ravandi, Courtney Denton Dinardo, Tapan Mahendra Kadia, Marina Konopleva et al.
2 citations
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
3.54
article

Long-term follow-up of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Farhad Ravandi, Courtney Denton Dinardo, Tapan Mahendra Kadia, Marina Konopleva, Regina Abramova, Musa E. Yilmaz, Gautam M. Borthakur, Xuelin Huang, Ghayas C. Issa, Naval Daver, Wei Qiao, Omer Karrar, Nicholas James Short, Roberta Santos Azevedo, Elias Jabbour, H. Kantarjian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, especially those with FLT3-ITD mutations, have poor outcomes with azacitidine and venetoclax (VEN). The combination of azacitidine, VEN, and gilteritinib (GILT) has demonstrated promising results, with CR/CRi rate of 96%, flow measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate of 93%, and median overall survival (OS) not reached (NR) at a median follow-up of 19.3 months. Here we report long-term (>3-year) follow-up from a phase II trial of this triplet regimen in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3-mutated AML. Methods: Adult pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy received azacitidine 75mg/m2 on days 1-7, VEN 400mg on days 1-28, and GILT 80mg on days 1-28. On day 14, a bone marrow was performed and both VEN and GILT were held if bone marrow blasts <5% or if aplastic/insufficient. For cycle 2-24, pts received azacitidine on days 1-5, VEN 400mg on days 1-7, and continuous GILT. Starting in cycle 25, GILT 80mg daily was maintained as monotherapy. Astellas Pharma provided funding and GILT drug support for this study. Results: Between October 2020 and December 2022, 30 pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 18-86 years) with 8 pts (30%) aged ≥75 years. 15 pts (50%) had an ECOG of 2. 22 pts (73%) had FLT3-ITD mutations and 8 (27%) had FLT3-TKD mutations. Mutations in RAS pathway (KRAS, NRAS, PTPN11, CBL1, NF1 and/or BRAF) were detectable in 7 pts (23%). 14 pts (47%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission at a median time of 4.8 months from treatment initiation (11 with FLT3-ITD; 3 with FLT3-TKD). 6 pts (43%) received post-transplant FLT3i maintenance (5 with GILT). Among pts who underwent SCT, 6 (43%) are alive in continuous CR, 5 (36%) died in CR, and 3 (21%) relapsed at 9.1, 9.9, and 20.7 months after SCT. Of the 16 pts (53%) who did not undergo SCT, 5 (31%) remain in continuous CR, 3 (19%) died in CR, and 8 (50%) relapsed after a median remission duration of 21.1 months (range, 2.9-38.4 months). Among 11 pts who had relapsed, 8 had FLT3-ITD and 3 had FLT3-TKD mutations at study enrollment. At relapse, 6 of 9 pts (67%) tested by PCR no longer had detectable FLT3 mutations, and 6 of 8 pts (75%) who underwent cyto-molecular testing showed evidence of clonal evolution. With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 23.4 months, with a 3-year RFS of 43%. The median OS was 29.7 months, and the 3-year OS was 46%. Among pts with FLT3-ITD mutations, median RFS and OS were 17 and 21.8 months, and 3-year RFS and OS were 32% and 36%, respectively. For those with FLT3-TKD mutations, median RFS and OS were 38.5 months and NR, and the 3-year RFS and OS were both 75%. No survival difference was observed by age group. Pts <75 years had a 3-year RFS of 45% and OS of 50%, while those ≥75 years had 38% for both (RFS: p=0.54; OS: p=0.53). Pts with RAS pathway mutations trended toward worse outcomes compared with those without these mutations (3-year RFS: 29% vs. 48%, p=0.1; 3-year OS: 29% vs. 52%, p=0.2). In a landmark analysis, outcomes did not differ significantly based on SCT status. The 3-year RFS was 43% for pts who underwent SCT versus 54% for those who did not (p=0.75); the 3-year OS was 50% versus 54%, respectively (p=0.78). No unexpected adverse events (AEs) were observed with longer follow-up. The most common grade ≥3 nonhematological AEs were infection (19 pts, 63%), febrile neutropenia (12 pts, 40%), and sepsis (5 pts, 17%). The median number of cycles received was 3 (range, 1-36). 10 (33%) and 7 (23%) pts received ≥6 and ≥12 cycles, respectively. 4 pts (13%) completed 24 cycles. Among 25 pts who received ≥2 cycles, 17 (68%) required dose reductions of at least one drug, including VEN in 12 pts (48%), azacitidine in 11 pts (44%), and GILT in 7 pts (28%). Among pts who received at least 6 cycles of therapy, the median duration of azacitidine, VEN, and GILT were 5 (range, 3-5), 7 (range, 3-7), and 28 days (range, 7-28), respectively. Conclusion: Continued follow-up of pts with ND FLT3-mutated AML treated with azacitidine, VEN and GILT demonstrates durable responses and encouraging survival. Outcomes appear superior to standard azacitidine and venetoclax, and randomized studies are warranted.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Montefiore Medical Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.