A novel prognostic scoring system incorporating XPO1 for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Abstract Objective: To identify and validate prognostic protein biomarkers for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and develop a novel prognostic scoring system integrating protein biomarkers with clinical characteristics. Methods: This study employed a four-pronged methodological approach: 1. Retrospective high-throughput DIA proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from PCNSL patients with favorable vs unfavorable prognoses to identify differential proteins. 2. Prospective PRM-targeted proteomic validation using pretreatment CSF from newly diagnosed PCNSL patients. 3. ELISA validation of key biomarkers and IHC assessment of their expression in brain tissues. 4. Development of a prognostic scoring system through univariate/multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics and protein biomarkers, with subsequent risk stratification and survival analysis. Results: Firstly,we identified 395 differentially expressed proteins, with 9 (IGLV4-69, AGRN, XPO1, HPR, FGFR3, PRELP, LFNG, CGREF1, CRTAC1) validated by PRM. XPO1 showed the strongest prognostic discrimination (P<0.0001; ROC-AUC=0.824). Secondly,multivariate analysis revealed ECOG >2, elevated XPO1, and elevated IGLV4-69 as independent poor prognostic factors. Thirdly, ELISA and IHC assays consistently showed higher XPO1 expression in poor-prognosis patient. Fourthly,we developed a prognostic scoring system incorporating six parameters (1 point each): multiple lesions, bulky disease, ECOG>2, elevated CSF protein, CSF lymphoma cells, and high level of XPO1. Patients were stratified into low-intermediate risk (0-3 points) and high-risk (4-6 points) groups, with significantly different outcomes: median PFS 23 vs 2 months (HR=3.878, 95%CI:2.137-7.039, P<0.001) and median OS not reached vs 19 months (HR=4.606, 95%CI:2.187-9.701, P<0.001). Conclusion: Through integrated proteomic and clinical analysis, we identified XPO1 as a key PCNSL prognostic biomarker and developed a practical scoring system that effectively discriminates risk groups. The established scoring system may guide personalized treatment strategies and facilitate targeted therapeutic decisions of PCNSL patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5436
Primary Topic
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel prognostic scoring system incorporating XPO1 for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Yan Ma, Bobin Chen, Mengxue Zhang, Zhiguang Lin et al.
Blood
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A novel prognostic scoring system incorporating XPO1 for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Yan Ma, Bobin Chen, Mengxue Zhang, Zhiguang Lin, Qing Li, Jingjing Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To identify and validate prognostic protein biomarkers for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and develop a novel prognostic scoring system integrating protein biomarkers with clinical characteristics. Methods: This study employed a four-pronged methodological approach: 1. Retrospective high-throughput DIA proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from PCNSL patients with favorable vs unfavorable prognoses to identify differential proteins. 2. Prospective PRM-targeted proteomic validation using pretreatment CSF from newly diagnosed PCNSL patients. 3. ELISA validation of key biomarkers and IHC assessment of their expression in brain tissues. 4. Development of a prognostic scoring system through univariate/multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics and protein biomarkers, with subsequent risk stratification and survival analysis. Results: Firstly,we identified 395 differentially expressed proteins, with 9 (IGLV4-69, AGRN, XPO1, HPR, FGFR3, PRELP, LFNG, CGREF1, CRTAC1) validated by PRM. XPO1 showed the strongest prognostic discrimination (P<0.0001; ROC-AUC=0.824). Secondly,multivariate analysis revealed ECOG >2, elevated XPO1, and elevated IGLV4-69 as independent poor prognostic factors. Thirdly, ELISA and IHC assays consistently showed higher XPO1 expression in poor-prognosis patient. Fourthly,we developed a prognostic scoring system incorporating six parameters (1 point each): multiple lesions, bulky disease, ECOG>2, elevated CSF protein, CSF lymphoma cells, and high level of XPO1. Patients were stratified into low-intermediate risk (0-3 points) and high-risk (4-6 points) groups, with significantly different outcomes: median PFS 23 vs 2 months (HR=3.878, 95%CI:2.137-7.039, P<0.001) and median OS not reached vs 19 months (HR=4.606, 95%CI:2.187-9.701, P<0.001). Conclusion: Through integrated proteomic and clinical analysis, we identified XPO1 as a key PCNSL prognostic biomarker and developed a practical scoring system that effectively discriminates risk groups. The established scoring system may guide personalized treatment strategies and facilitate targeted therapeutic decisions of PCNSL patients.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Fudan University (CN), Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.