Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers

Fertility preservation is a critical consideration in the care of reproductive-aged patients with gynecologic cancers, yet referral to reproductive specialists remains low, indicating a gap between guidance and practice. We compared 28 clinical guidelines that addressed fertility-sparing management of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers, and reviewed diagnostic workup, eligibility thresholds, surgical approaches, and surveillance protocols. Recommendations were synthesized into stage-specific pathways to delineate areas of consensus, highlight discrepancies, and map evidence gaps. There is broad agreement across multiple independent guidelines to support fertility-sparing treatment for carefully selected patients with: grade 1, stage IA endometrioid endometrial carcinoma; stage IA1-IB1 cervical tumors measuring less than 2 cm without high-risk features; and borderline ovarian tumors and most malignant germ cell tumors. Recommendations for higher stage disease and uncommon histologies, however, diverge and remain inconsistent. Overall guideline quality was moderate to high but frequently relied on limited evidence or expert opinion outside early-stage, low-risk conditions. Synthesizing current guidance clarifies areas where practice can be standardized and prospective data are needed. Embedding routine fertility counseling and referral into standardized pathways is an important step to improve uptake while maintaining oncologic safety and preserving fertility potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006141
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers

Sahar Rehman, Chien Oh, Murat Erden, Benjamin Schwartz et al.
2 citations
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
4.11
article

Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers

Sahar Rehman, Chien Oh, Murat Erden, Benjamin Schwartz, Rosanne M. Kho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fertility preservation is a critical consideration in the care of reproductive-aged patients with gynecologic cancers, yet referral to reproductive specialists remains low, indicating a gap between guidance and practice. We compared 28 clinical guidelines that addressed fertility-sparing management of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers, and reviewed diagnostic workup, eligibility thresholds, surgical approaches, and surveillance protocols. Recommendations were synthesized into stage-specific pathways to delineate areas of consensus, highlight discrepancies, and map evidence gaps. There is broad agreement across multiple independent guidelines to support fertility-sparing treatment for carefully selected patients with: grade 1, stage IA endometrioid endometrial carcinoma; stage IA1-IB1 cervical tumors measuring less than 2 cm without high-risk features; and borderline ovarian tumors and most malignant germ cell tumors. Recommendations for higher stage disease and uncommon histologies, however, diverge and remain inconsistent. Overall guideline quality was moderate to high but frequently relied on limited evidence or expert opinion outside early-stage, low-risk conditions. Synthesizing current guidance clarifies areas where practice can be standardized and prospective data are needed. Embedding routine fertility counseling and referral into standardized pathways is an important step to improve uptake while maintaining oncologic safety and preserving fertility potential.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(2)
Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
4.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.