Immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed b-ALL patients: A propensity score-matched study

Abstract Introduction: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia(B-ALL) is a common malignant tumour of the blood system.With a high frequency of severe side effects and low tolerance to standard chemotherapy, some patients have a poor prognosis.Therefore,optimizing first-line treatment is critical to achieving deep remission and improving prognosis. In recent years, some data have indicated that integrating immunotherapy into first-line treatment improves remission rates, minimal residual disease(MRD) negativity rate and long-term prognosis. However, there is still a lack of relevant researches. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Methods: This retrospective study included 133 patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Among them, 25 patients received immunotherapy(blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin) without or with low-intensity chemotherapy (immunotherapy group) while 108 patients received standard chemotherapy(chemotherapy group). After propensity score matching (1:1), each group consisted of 8 Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) patients and 17 Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) patients. All Ph+ patients received concurrent treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Low-dose chemotherapy regimens included VP, CP or VDP, whereas standard chemotherapy regimens comprised VDLP, VDCP or VDCLP. Finally, remission rates and adverse event rates were compared between two groups. Results: The MRD negative rate was significantly greater in the immunotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (88% vs. 48%, p=0.002).Compared to the chemotherapy group, the immunotherapy group had higher minimum platelet counts (30 vs. 8×10⁹/L, p = 0.006), shorter duration of platelet counts < 50×10⁹/L (6 vs. 17 d, p = 0.015) and higher minimum neutrophil counts (0.14 vs. 0.01×10⁹/L, p = 0.000). They experienced fewer pulmonary infection(56% vs. 84%, p=0.031). In addition, red blood cell transfusions (4 vs. 8u, p=0.030) and platelet transfusions(0 vs. 80u, p=0.000)were lower in the immunotherapy group. Conclusion: Our present study demonstrates that immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy as first-line treatment improves clinical efficacy while reducing adverse events in newly diagnosed B-ALL patients compared to standard chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6870
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed b-ALL patients: A propensity score-matched study

Ming‐Feng Hou, Yan Shi, Yu Hou, Jiahui Mao et al.
Blood
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed b-ALL patients: A propensity score-matched study

Ming‐Feng Hou, Yan Shi, Yu Hou, Jiahui Mao, Bingqian Huang, Yawen Wang, Yubin Li, Chunyan Ji, Ruixue Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia(B-ALL) is a common malignant tumour of the blood system.With a high frequency of severe side effects and low tolerance to standard chemotherapy, some patients have a poor prognosis.Therefore,optimizing first-line treatment is critical to achieving deep remission and improving prognosis. In recent years, some data have indicated that integrating immunotherapy into first-line treatment improves remission rates, minimal residual disease(MRD) negativity rate and long-term prognosis. However, there is still a lack of relevant researches. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Methods: This retrospective study included 133 patients newly diagnosed with B-ALL. Among them, 25 patients received immunotherapy(blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin) without or with low-intensity chemotherapy (immunotherapy group) while 108 patients received standard chemotherapy(chemotherapy group). After propensity score matching (1:1), each group consisted of 8 Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) patients and 17 Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) patients. All Ph+ patients received concurrent treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Low-dose chemotherapy regimens included VP, CP or VDP, whereas standard chemotherapy regimens comprised VDLP, VDCP or VDCLP. Finally, remission rates and adverse event rates were compared between two groups. Results: The MRD negative rate was significantly greater in the immunotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (88% vs. 48%, p=0.002).Compared to the chemotherapy group, the immunotherapy group had higher minimum platelet counts (30 vs. 8×10⁹/L, p = 0.006), shorter duration of platelet counts < 50×10⁹/L (6 vs. 17 d, p = 0.015) and higher minimum neutrophil counts (0.14 vs. 0.01×10⁹/L, p = 0.000). They experienced fewer pulmonary infection(56% vs. 84%, p=0.031). In addition, red blood cell transfusions (4 vs. 8u, p=0.030) and platelet transfusions(0 vs. 80u, p=0.000)were lower in the immunotherapy group. Conclusion: Our present study demonstrates that immunotherapy without or with low-intensity chemotherapy as first-line treatment improves clinical efficacy while reducing adverse events in newly diagnosed B-ALL patients compared to standard chemotherapy.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.