Adults with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background: Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of ALL that arises secondary to cytotoxic therapies for prior malignancies. While t-ALL exhibits distinct adverse cytogenetic features and a worse clinical profile compared to de novo ALL, its comparative survival outcomes remain unclear. Objective: To systematically evaluate and compare survival outcomes between adults with t-ALL and those with de novo ALL. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched up to December 31, 2024. Eligible studies included adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with t-ALL or de novo ALL with reported survival outcomes. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was estimated using Doi's Quality Effects model, incorporating study quality via the MASTER scale. Results: A total of 169,237 patients across 27 studies were included in the systematic review, including 1,827 patients with t-ALL. Of these, 9 studies (30,527 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled HR for overall mortality in t-ALL compared to de novo ALL was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94–1.23; p = 0.29), indicating no statistically significant difference. Descriptive analysis showed that B-cell lineage was predominant in t-ALL cases (80–100%), while T-cell lineage accounted for 0–20%. t-ALL patients also had higher frequencies of poor-risk cytogenetics, TP53 mutations (38% vs. 10%), and complex karyotypes (5.8–11.1%). Complete remission rates and median overall survival were lower in t-ALL, with a trend toward inferior outcomes that was not statistically significant. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I² = 50.5%), and publication bias was detected. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimate. Conclusion: Despite its distinct adverse genetic profile, t-ALL demonstrates comparable overall survival to de novo ALL, particularly in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of early molecular profiling and aggressive treatment strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk group. Keywords: therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia, de novo ALL, systematic review, meta-analysis,

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6850
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adults with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Razan Hourani, Hafsa Khalid, Muhammad Salman Khan, Dina A. Soliman et al.
Blood
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Adults with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Razan Hourani, Hafsa Khalid, Muhammad Salman Khan, Dina A. Soliman, Shehab Mohamed, Suhail A.R. Doi, Deena Mudawi, H. Charif, Abdulrahman Fadhl Al-Mashdali, Rowan Mesilhy, Asma Syed, Yasmin Elsalkawi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of ALL that arises secondary to cytotoxic therapies for prior malignancies. While t-ALL exhibits distinct adverse cytogenetic features and a worse clinical profile compared to de novo ALL, its comparative survival outcomes remain unclear. Objective: To systematically evaluate and compare survival outcomes between adults with t-ALL and those with de novo ALL. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched up to December 31, 2024. Eligible studies included adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with t-ALL or de novo ALL with reported survival outcomes. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was estimated using Doi's Quality Effects model, incorporating study quality via the MASTER scale. Results: A total of 169,237 patients across 27 studies were included in the systematic review, including 1,827 patients with t-ALL. Of these, 9 studies (30,527 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled HR for overall mortality in t-ALL compared to de novo ALL was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94–1.23; p = 0.29), indicating no statistically significant difference. Descriptive analysis showed that B-cell lineage was predominant in t-ALL cases (80–100%), while T-cell lineage accounted for 0–20%. t-ALL patients also had higher frequencies of poor-risk cytogenetics, TP53 mutations (38% vs. 10%), and complex karyotypes (5.8–11.1%). Complete remission rates and median overall survival were lower in t-ALL, with a trend toward inferior outcomes that was not statistically significant. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I² = 50.5%), and publication bias was detected. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimate. Conclusion: Despite its distinct adverse genetic profile, t-ALL demonstrates comparable overall survival to de novo ALL, particularly in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of early molecular profiling and aggressive treatment strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk group. Keywords: therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia, de novo ALL, systematic review, meta-analysis,

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Qatar Airways (Qatar) (QA), Cairo University (EG), National Center for Cancer Care and Research (QA), Children Cancer Hospital (EG), Qatar University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.