Prospective observational cohort study to collect granular social determinants of health data for hematopoietic cell transplant patients

Abstract Background: Although patient (pt) social/financial barriers impact transplant (BMT) outcomes, comprehensive, granular social determinants of health (SDOH) data are not routinely collected across our field. Methods: We launched a single center, prospective, observational cohort study to determine BMT pts' social/financial barriers to care (clinicaltrials.gov NCT06431347). Pts were eligible if ≥18 years & received BMT financial approval. The study opened 7/2024 to allograft & 11/2024 to autograft pts. A dedicated staff member recorded detailed SDOH data, after explaining why these data are needed. Pts reporting urgent financial needs were offered social work referral. We examined multiple social (low pt/caregiver educational attainment/ English language level or low pt confidence with written medical information) & financial [household income below median of our city ($60,000) or cost-of-living/ medical expense insecurity or high-risk of financial toxicity by COST-FACIT score ≤24] barriers by pt ancestry & graft source. Results: From 7/1/24-6/30/25, 424 pts were screened for the study & most (401/424, 95%) enrolled; 11 (3%) died prior to enrollment & only 9 (2%) declined to participate (6 due to lack of interest & 3 discomfort with survey questions). Of 401 enrolled pts [232 (58%) male; median age 62 yrs, range 19-82; 240 (60%) with acute leukemia/MDS/MPN], most (394, 98%) enrolled ±45 days from BMT. 122 received auto- & 276 allo-grafts [246 (89%) HLA-matched & 30 (11%) HLA-mismatched (4 cord blood, 25 haploidentical, 1 mismatched unrelated)]. 271 had European ancestry & 129 non-European ancestry (39 African, 57 non-Black Hispanic, 23 Asian, 10 mixed non-European). In a sub-analysis of 107 participants exploring data collection acceptability & reception, most felt the data collection process was comfortable (89, 83%; with only 1 pt reporting it was uncomfortable) & low-effort (90, 84%; with none reporting high-effort), with ~60% recognizing (& none disagreeing) that the data gathered will help our care teams understand their specific social situation & that of all our pts. Overall, 54 (13%) pts reported ≥1 social barrier: 27 (8%) pts &/or their caregiver had an education level less than high school & for 8 (2%) one of the pair did not speak English, & 32 (8%) pts needed help with written medical instructions. 173 (43%) pts reported ≥1 financial barrier: 84 (21%; median household size of 2, range 1-12) had a combined household income <$60,000 in the past year [36 (9%) had <$30,000]; 76 (19%) had cost-of-living &/or medical expense insecurity [41 (10%) housing, 36 (9%) food, 30 (7%) transportation, 26 (6%) utility, 40 (10%) medication/co-pays/insurance]; & 116 (29%) had high-risk of financial toxicity based on COST-FACIT score ≤24. Importantly, different SDOH measures classified different subsets of pts as vulnerable, with 54 (13%) pts having ≥1 social barrier but only 11 (3%) with ≥2 & only 2 (<1%) all 3; similarly, 173 pts had ≥1 financial barrier but only 74 (18%) had ≥2 & only 29 (7%) all 3. By ancestry, compared with Europeans, non-European pts had greater social & financial vulnerability, with >2x the proportion having ≥1 [9% vs 22%, P<.001] or ≥2 [1% vs 7%, P<.001] social barriers & over 60% more with ≥1 [36% vs 59%, P<.001] & >2x with ≥2 [13% vs 29%, P<.001] financial barriers [including 2x as many with cost-of-living &/or medical insecurity (15% vs 28%, P=.003) or with high risk of financial toxicity based on COST-FACIT score ≤24 (22% vs 44%, P<.001)]. Non-European HLA-mismatched allograft recipients (n=10), a population with high medical needs, had high proportions with ≥1 social (40%) & ≥1 financial (80%) barriers. Overall, 80 (20%) pts reported urgent financial needs with 53 (13%) referred to social work, most of whom (37/53, 70%) received grant support &/or financial/resource counselling.Conclusions: We describe detailed SDOH data for pts across a department at a large cancer center & show the data collection process to be feasible & acceptable to pts with a very high participation rate. We demonstrate the application of these data to health outcomes research (ie describing the social/financial barriers impacting specific at-risk populations) & to pt care (by supporting identification & addressing of urgent pt social/ financial needs). Our work will support standardized SDOH data collection processes in the BMT field & across oncology, & inform pilot interventions to address social & financial barriers to care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6163
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective observational cohort study to collect granular social determinants of health data for hematopoietic cell transplant patients

Ricky Garcia, Gabriela Rondón, Ligny Hunter, Warren Fingrut et al.
Blood
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Prospective observational cohort study to collect granular social determinants of health data for hematopoietic cell transplant patients

Ricky Garcia, Gabriela Rondón, Ligny Hunter, Warren Fingrut, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Christopher R. Flowers, Charles Martinez, Denái R. Milton, KaNoisha Codrington
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although patient (pt) social/financial barriers impact transplant (BMT) outcomes, comprehensive, granular social determinants of health (SDOH) data are not routinely collected across our field. Methods: We launched a single center, prospective, observational cohort study to determine BMT pts' social/financial barriers to care (clinicaltrials.gov NCT06431347). Pts were eligible if ≥18 years & received BMT financial approval. The study opened 7/2024 to allograft & 11/2024 to autograft pts. A dedicated staff member recorded detailed SDOH data, after explaining why these data are needed. Pts reporting urgent financial needs were offered social work referral. We examined multiple social (low pt/caregiver educational attainment/ English language level or low pt confidence with written medical information) & financial [household income below median of our city ($60,000) or cost-of-living/ medical expense insecurity or high-risk of financial toxicity by COST-FACIT score ≤24] barriers by pt ancestry & graft source. Results: From 7/1/24-6/30/25, 424 pts were screened for the study & most (401/424, 95%) enrolled; 11 (3%) died prior to enrollment & only 9 (2%) declined to participate (6 due to lack of interest & 3 discomfort with survey questions). Of 401 enrolled pts [232 (58%) male; median age 62 yrs, range 19-82; 240 (60%) with acute leukemia/MDS/MPN], most (394, 98%) enrolled ±45 days from BMT. 122 received auto- & 276 allo-grafts [246 (89%) HLA-matched & 30 (11%) HLA-mismatched (4 cord blood, 25 haploidentical, 1 mismatched unrelated)]. 271 had European ancestry & 129 non-European ancestry (39 African, 57 non-Black Hispanic, 23 Asian, 10 mixed non-European). In a sub-analysis of 107 participants exploring data collection acceptability & reception, most felt the data collection process was comfortable (89, 83%; with only 1 pt reporting it was uncomfortable) & low-effort (90, 84%; with none reporting high-effort), with ~60% recognizing (& none disagreeing) that the data gathered will help our care teams understand their specific social situation & that of all our pts. Overall, 54 (13%) pts reported ≥1 social barrier: 27 (8%) pts &/or their caregiver had an education level less than high school & for 8 (2%) one of the pair did not speak English, & 32 (8%) pts needed help with written medical instructions. 173 (43%) pts reported ≥1 financial barrier: 84 (21%; median household size of 2, range 1-12) had a combined household income <$60,000 in the past year [36 (9%) had <$30,000]; 76 (19%) had cost-of-living &/or medical expense insecurity [41 (10%) housing, 36 (9%) food, 30 (7%) transportation, 26 (6%) utility, 40 (10%) medication/co-pays/insurance]; & 116 (29%) had high-risk of financial toxicity based on COST-FACIT score ≤24. Importantly, different SDOH measures classified different subsets of pts as vulnerable, with 54 (13%) pts having ≥1 social barrier but only 11 (3%) with ≥2 & only 2 (<1%) all 3; similarly, 173 pts had ≥1 financial barrier but only 74 (18%) had ≥2 & only 29 (7%) all 3. By ancestry, compared with Europeans, non-European pts had greater social & financial vulnerability, with >2x the proportion having ≥1 [9% vs 22%, P<.001] or ≥2 [1% vs 7%, P<.001] social barriers & over 60% more with ≥1 [36% vs 59%, P<.001] & >2x with ≥2 [13% vs 29%, P<.001] financial barriers [including 2x as many with cost-of-living &/or medical insecurity (15% vs 28%, P=.003) or with high risk of financial toxicity based on COST-FACIT score ≤24 (22% vs 44%, P<.001)]. Non-European HLA-mismatched allograft recipients (n=10), a population with high medical needs, had high proportions with ≥1 social (40%) & ≥1 financial (80%) barriers. Overall, 80 (20%) pts reported urgent financial needs with 53 (13%) referred to social work, most of whom (37/53, 70%) received grant support &/or financial/resource counselling.Conclusions: We describe detailed SDOH data for pts across a department at a large cancer center & show the data collection process to be feasible & acceptable to pts with a very high participation rate. We demonstrate the application of these data to health outcomes research (ie describing the social/financial barriers impacting specific at-risk populations) & to pt care (by supporting identification & addressing of urgent pt social/ financial needs). Our work will support standardized SDOH data collection processes in the BMT field & across oncology, & inform pilot interventions to address social & financial barriers to care.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.