Lower dose emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A: Real - world outcomes, hemostatic profiles and cost- effectiveness from a resource limited setting

Abstract Background: Although Emicizumab has transformed prophylaxis in Hemophilia A management, standard-dose therapy remains inaccessible for most in resource-limited settings. Evidence on lower dose Emicizumab in real-world pediatric cohorts is limited. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes, thromboelastography (TEG) profiles, and cost-effectiveness in children receiving lower dose Emicizumab compared to prior treatment regimens. Methods: This was a hybrid observational study comprising a retrospective clinical audit and a prospectively designed laboratory substudy, conducted at a single tertiary care center in India of children with severe Hemophilia A who initiated lower-dose Emicizumab prophylaxis between June 2019 and May 2024. Eighteen pediatric patients were included: 15 without inhibitors (on low- to intermediate-dose clotting factor concentrate [CFC] prophylaxis) and 3 with inhibitors (previously on FEIBA on demand). Clinical Outcomes: Annualized bleed rates (ABR) and school absenteeism (days/year) were recorded for one year pre- and post-Emicizumab. Data were verified using clinical documentation and parental recall. Laboratory Evaluation: All 18 children underwent TEG while on Emicizumab. Parameters—R time, K time, α-angle, and maximum amplitude (MA)—were compared with age-matched Hemophilia A controls not on Emicizumab. Correlations with clinical bleeding outcomes were explored. Plasma Emicizumab concentrations were measured in a subset (n=9) using a modified ELISA assay. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A detailed healthcare system cost analysis compared treatment expenditures before and after Emicizumab initiation. Costs included prophylactic and episodic factor use, hospitalization, emergency transport, and Emicizumab acquisition. Cost per bleed avoided and cost per school day gained were calculated. Statistical Analysis: Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for continuous variables; chi-square test for categorical data. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS v25.0 was used for all analyses. Results: Mean age was 8.1 years (range 2–17). Three children (16.6%) were inhibitor-positive, previously managed with FEIBA. The mean monthly Emicizumab dose was 2.8 mg/kg (Range: 1.3-5.8 mg/kg/month, SD 1.45), yielding a mean plasma level of 25.16 µg/mL (Range: 6.01-48.42, SD 16). Prior to switching, average FVIII usage was 30 IU/kg/week (7.4 - 77.7 IU/kg/week).ABR dropped significantly from 6 (Range: 0-28, SD 8) to 0.6 (Range 0-2, SD 0.7) post-Emicizumab (p < 0.01). All 10 post-treatment bleeds were minor and trauma-related. No major bleeds occurred. The proportion with zero bleeds increased from 16.6% on FVIII to 44.4% on Emicizumab (p = 0.03).School absenteeism declined from a median of ~30 days/year to <10 days/year (p = 0.03), indicating improved quality of life.Plasma Emicizumab levels correlated strongly with administered dose (p < 0.01), confirming predictable pharmacokinetics at lower doses.TEG demonstrated significant improvements in global hemostasis: median R-time (5 vs 22 min, p < 0.001), K-time (1.3 vs 4.3 min, p < 0.001), α-angle (70° vs 45°, p < 0.001), MA (79 vs 66 mm, p < 0.001), coagulation index (4 vs –11, p < 0.001), and thrombin generation (950 vs 812, p < 0.001). However, TEG parameters did not predict individual bleeding phenotypes.Mean annual treatment cost increased from USD 5,790 (Range: 401 - 39279, SD 8,791) to USD 20,115 (Range: 8047.4 - 40220, SD 12,039). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for avoiding one bleed per year was USD 7,308 (95% CI: 3,604–12,085), within accepted thresholds based on a willingness-to-pay of two times per capita GDP, per Health Technology Assessment (HTA) guidelines. Conclusion: Lower dose Emicizumab significantly reduces bleeding and school absenteeism in children with Hemophilia A, including those on prior low/intermediate-dose FVIII prophylaxis or bypassing agents. Despite higher costs, the clinical and functional benefits support its cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings. TEG parameters improved post-therapy but did not correlate with bleeding phenotype. These findings support adoption of tailored, lower-dose Emicizumab regimens as a viable and sustainable prophylaxis option in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6169
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower dose emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A: Real - world outcomes, hemostatic profiles and cost- effectiveness from a resource limited setting

Niranjan Vijayakumar, Bitty Kurian, Linny Paul, Neeraj Sidharthan et al.
Blood
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Lower dose emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A: Real - world outcomes, hemostatic profiles and cost- effectiveness from a resource limited setting

Niranjan Vijayakumar, Bitty Kurian, Linny Paul, Neeraj Sidharthan, Lincy Paul, Ullas Mony, G Rema, Reema Miria Abraham, Georg Gutjahr, Raveen Raj, R. Nathan, Anandakrishnan Nandakumar, Shainy Glady, C B Seethalmol
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although Emicizumab has transformed prophylaxis in Hemophilia A management, standard-dose therapy remains inaccessible for most in resource-limited settings. Evidence on lower dose Emicizumab in real-world pediatric cohorts is limited. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes, thromboelastography (TEG) profiles, and cost-effectiveness in children receiving lower dose Emicizumab compared to prior treatment regimens. Methods: This was a hybrid observational study comprising a retrospective clinical audit and a prospectively designed laboratory substudy, conducted at a single tertiary care center in India of children with severe Hemophilia A who initiated lower-dose Emicizumab prophylaxis between June 2019 and May 2024. Eighteen pediatric patients were included: 15 without inhibitors (on low- to intermediate-dose clotting factor concentrate [CFC] prophylaxis) and 3 with inhibitors (previously on FEIBA on demand). Clinical Outcomes: Annualized bleed rates (ABR) and school absenteeism (days/year) were recorded for one year pre- and post-Emicizumab. Data were verified using clinical documentation and parental recall. Laboratory Evaluation: All 18 children underwent TEG while on Emicizumab. Parameters—R time, K time, α-angle, and maximum amplitude (MA)—were compared with age-matched Hemophilia A controls not on Emicizumab. Correlations with clinical bleeding outcomes were explored. Plasma Emicizumab concentrations were measured in a subset (n=9) using a modified ELISA assay. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A detailed healthcare system cost analysis compared treatment expenditures before and after Emicizumab initiation. Costs included prophylactic and episodic factor use, hospitalization, emergency transport, and Emicizumab acquisition. Cost per bleed avoided and cost per school day gained were calculated. Statistical Analysis: Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for continuous variables; chi-square test for categorical data. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS v25.0 was used for all analyses. Results: Mean age was 8.1 years (range 2–17). Three children (16.6%) were inhibitor-positive, previously managed with FEIBA. The mean monthly Emicizumab dose was 2.8 mg/kg (Range: 1.3-5.8 mg/kg/month, SD 1.45), yielding a mean plasma level of 25.16 µg/mL (Range: 6.01-48.42, SD 16). Prior to switching, average FVIII usage was 30 IU/kg/week (7.4 - 77.7 IU/kg/week).ABR dropped significantly from 6 (Range: 0-28, SD 8) to 0.6 (Range 0-2, SD 0.7) post-Emicizumab (p < 0.01). All 10 post-treatment bleeds were minor and trauma-related. No major bleeds occurred. The proportion with zero bleeds increased from 16.6% on FVIII to 44.4% on Emicizumab (p = 0.03).School absenteeism declined from a median of ~30 days/year to <10 days/year (p = 0.03), indicating improved quality of life.Plasma Emicizumab levels correlated strongly with administered dose (p < 0.01), confirming predictable pharmacokinetics at lower doses.TEG demonstrated significant improvements in global hemostasis: median R-time (5 vs 22 min, p < 0.001), K-time (1.3 vs 4.3 min, p < 0.001), α-angle (70° vs 45°, p < 0.001), MA (79 vs 66 mm, p < 0.001), coagulation index (4 vs –11, p < 0.001), and thrombin generation (950 vs 812, p < 0.001). However, TEG parameters did not predict individual bleeding phenotypes.Mean annual treatment cost increased from USD 5,790 (Range: 401 - 39279, SD 8,791) to USD 20,115 (Range: 8047.4 - 40220, SD 12,039). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for avoiding one bleed per year was USD 7,308 (95% CI: 3,604–12,085), within accepted thresholds based on a willingness-to-pay of two times per capita GDP, per Health Technology Assessment (HTA) guidelines. Conclusion: Lower dose Emicizumab significantly reduces bleeding and school absenteeism in children with Hemophilia A, including those on prior low/intermediate-dose FVIII prophylaxis or bypassing agents. Despite higher costs, the clinical and functional benefits support its cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings. TEG parameters improved post-therapy but did not correlate with bleeding phenotype. These findings support adoption of tailored, lower-dose Emicizumab regimens as a viable and sustainable prophylaxis option in low- and middle-income countries.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Haemophilia Foundation Australia (AU), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India) (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.