Pre-transplant CAR T-cell therapy is associated with inferior survival and increased non-relapse mortality in pediatric B-ALL: A single-center retrospective analysis

Abstract Introduction The curative potential of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is greatest when minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission is achieved prior to transplant. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy offers a novel path to remission for chemotherapy-refractory patients, many of whom proceed to consolidative HSCT. While toxicities of HSCT and CAR T-cell therapy are increasingly well-described, data on outcomes when both modalities are used sequentially remain limited. We compared survival and transplant-related toxicity in pediatric patients with B-ALL who received CAR T therapy prior to HSCT versus those who did not. Methods This retrospective study included patients age 0-25 years who underwent first allogeneic HSCT for B-ALL at Stanford Medicine Children's Health from October 1, 2017 to May 31, 2024. Outcomes were compared between patients who received CAR T therapy pre-HSCT (CAR T group) and those who did not (HSCT-only group). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models; graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were analyzed using Fine & Gray subdistribution hazard models. Results Among 74 patients, 38 (51%) received CAR T therapy prior to HSCT. Both groups had similar age at diagnosis (median 12.3y), age at transplant (14.9y), and male predominance (58%). The CAR T group had higher proportion of patients with Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (74% vs 43%, p=0.06) and trisomy 21 (8% vs 0%, p=0.08). Risk profiles were similar: 77% were NCI high risk and 22% had unfavorable cytogenetics. CAR T patients had more prior therapy (3.4 vs 2.9 lines, p=0.04), were more often transplanted in ≥CR3 (34% vs 6%, p=0.009), and had higher frequency of primary refractory disease (39.5% vs 25%) and CNS relapse (63% vs 43%). All patients were MRD-negative by flow cytometry pre-HSCT; 78% had undetectable clones by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Donor characteristics, graft source, and GvHD prophylaxis were similar between groups. Sixty percent of patients received T-cell depleted haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Median Lansky/Karnofsky score was 90 and comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was 0 in both groups. Survival Two- and five-year OS for the full cohort were 81.5% and 76.6%, respectively; GRFS at 2 years was 73.6%. The CAR T group had significantly worse OS (p=0.0051), DFS (p=0.0047), and GRFS (p=0.01) compared to the HSCT-only group (2y OS 66.9% vs 94.4%; 5y OS 60.2% vs 90.3%; 2y DFS 66.2% vs 91.6%; 5y DFS 58.9% vs 91.6%; 2y GRFS 64.1% vs 83.2%). One-year NRM was higher in the CAR T group (16.8% vs 2.9%, p=0.01). In univariate analysis, CAR T was associated with inferior OS (HR 4.82, 95% CI 1.46-15.92), DFS (HR 4.73, 1.46-15.32), and increased NRM (SHR 5.41, 1.25-23.35). Primary refractory disease also predicted worse OS (HR 4, 1.39-11.48) and DFS (HR 4.62, 1.65-12.95). Fungal infection significantly impacted all survival outcomes. Unexpectedly, outcomes stratified by remission status showed the poorest OS and DFS in CR1 patients (p=0.019 and p=0.038), driven by CAR T recipients in CR1 (2y OS 27.7%, p<0.001). Toxicity Grade 2-4 aGvHD occurred in 27% of patients; grade 3-4 in 11%. Moderate-to-severe cGvHD occurred in 10% overall. Severe aGvHD (15.8% vs 5.6%) and immune-mediated complications (36.8% vs 19.4%) were more frequent in CAR T patients, but differences were not significant. Grade 3 viral infections were significantly more common in CAR T patients (26% vs 6%, p=0.025), and this association persisted even after adjusting for donor type (HR 6.4, 1.25-32.83, p=0.026). Immune Reconstitution Median time to CD4 >200/µL was 182 days, similar between groups. CAR T patients had earlier mitogen recovery (232d vs 362d, p=0.001), but delayed B-cell recovery (time to final IVIG 212d vs 82d, p=0.02). ConclusionPre-HSCT CAR T therapy is increasingly used in pediatric r/r B-ALL; yet, in this cohort, it was associated with significantly worse survival due to higher rates of relapse and NRM. Outcomes were especially poor in those requiring CAR T to achieve first remission. CAR T recipients were more prone to serious viral infections and immune complications post HSCT. These findings highlight the need to better risk-stratify pre-HSCT CAR T recipients and enhance supportive care during HSCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6077
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-transplant CAR T-cell therapy is associated with inferior survival and increased non-relapse mortality in pediatric B-ALL: A single-center retrospective analysis

Kara L. Davis, David C. Shyr, Tanja A. Grüber, Norman J. Lacayo et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Pre-transplant CAR T-cell therapy is associated with inferior survival and increased non-relapse mortality in pediatric B-ALL: A single-center retrospective analysis

Kara L. Davis, David C. Shyr, Tanja A. Grüber, Norman J. Lacayo, Rozalyn Chok, Orly R. Klein, Crystal L. Mackall, Liora M. Schultz, Ami J. Shah, Alice Bertaina, Minxuan Huang, Raya Saab, Catherine C. Aftandilian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The curative potential of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is greatest when minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission is achieved prior to transplant. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy offers a novel path to remission for chemotherapy-refractory patients, many of whom proceed to consolidative HSCT. While toxicities of HSCT and CAR T-cell therapy are increasingly well-described, data on outcomes when both modalities are used sequentially remain limited. We compared survival and transplant-related toxicity in pediatric patients with B-ALL who received CAR T therapy prior to HSCT versus those who did not. Methods This retrospective study included patients age 0-25 years who underwent first allogeneic HSCT for B-ALL at Stanford Medicine Children's Health from October 1, 2017 to May 31, 2024. Outcomes were compared between patients who received CAR T therapy pre-HSCT (CAR T group) and those who did not (HSCT-only group). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models; graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were analyzed using Fine & Gray subdistribution hazard models. Results Among 74 patients, 38 (51%) received CAR T therapy prior to HSCT. Both groups had similar age at diagnosis (median 12.3y), age at transplant (14.9y), and male predominance (58%). The CAR T group had higher proportion of patients with Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (74% vs 43%, p=0.06) and trisomy 21 (8% vs 0%, p=0.08). Risk profiles were similar: 77% were NCI high risk and 22% had unfavorable cytogenetics. CAR T patients had more prior therapy (3.4 vs 2.9 lines, p=0.04), were more often transplanted in ≥CR3 (34% vs 6%, p=0.009), and had higher frequency of primary refractory disease (39.5% vs 25%) and CNS relapse (63% vs 43%). All patients were MRD-negative by flow cytometry pre-HSCT; 78% had undetectable clones by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Donor characteristics, graft source, and GvHD prophylaxis were similar between groups. Sixty percent of patients received T-cell depleted haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Median Lansky/Karnofsky score was 90 and comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was 0 in both groups. Survival Two- and five-year OS for the full cohort were 81.5% and 76.6%, respectively; GRFS at 2 years was 73.6%. The CAR T group had significantly worse OS (p=0.0051), DFS (p=0.0047), and GRFS (p=0.01) compared to the HSCT-only group (2y OS 66.9% vs 94.4%; 5y OS 60.2% vs 90.3%; 2y DFS 66.2% vs 91.6%; 5y DFS 58.9% vs 91.6%; 2y GRFS 64.1% vs 83.2%). One-year NRM was higher in the CAR T group (16.8% vs 2.9%, p=0.01). In univariate analysis, CAR T was associated with inferior OS (HR 4.82, 95% CI 1.46-15.92), DFS (HR 4.73, 1.46-15.32), and increased NRM (SHR 5.41, 1.25-23.35). Primary refractory disease also predicted worse OS (HR 4, 1.39-11.48) and DFS (HR 4.62, 1.65-12.95). Fungal infection significantly impacted all survival outcomes. Unexpectedly, outcomes stratified by remission status showed the poorest OS and DFS in CR1 patients (p=0.019 and p=0.038), driven by CAR T recipients in CR1 (2y OS 27.7%, p<0.001). Toxicity Grade 2-4 aGvHD occurred in 27% of patients; grade 3-4 in 11%. Moderate-to-severe cGvHD occurred in 10% overall. Severe aGvHD (15.8% vs 5.6%) and immune-mediated complications (36.8% vs 19.4%) were more frequent in CAR T patients, but differences were not significant. Grade 3 viral infections were significantly more common in CAR T patients (26% vs 6%, p=0.025), and this association persisted even after adjusting for donor type (HR 6.4, 1.25-32.83, p=0.026). Immune Reconstitution Median time to CD4 >200/µL was 182 days, similar between groups. CAR T patients had earlier mitogen recovery (232d vs 362d, p=0.001), but delayed B-cell recovery (time to final IVIG 212d vs 82d, p=0.02). ConclusionPre-HSCT CAR T therapy is increasingly used in pediatric r/r B-ALL; yet, in this cohort, it was associated with significantly worse survival due to higher rates of relapse and NRM. Outcomes were especially poor in those requiring CAR T to achieve first remission. CAR T recipients were more prone to serious viral infections and immune complications post HSCT. These findings highlight the need to better risk-stratify pre-HSCT CAR T recipients and enhance supportive care during HSCT.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (IN), Palo Alto Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.